Four experiments were conducted to develop and test a method of determining the frequency‐response characteristic of the observer when he listens for single‐frequency signals presented against a continuous background of wide‐band noise. After observers were trained to detect primary signals of a single frequency, probe signals of various other frequencies were presented infrequently, in lieu of the primary signal. Primary signals and all probe signals were presented with very similar amplitudes that would be expected to render them all equally detectable if presented alone in single‐frequency experiments. Estimates of the detectability of the signals of the various frequencies were obtained concurrently in a two‐alternative forced‐choice procedure. The results from 14 observers were quite similar and show differences in detection as a function of signal frequency when the primary signal was of 1000 or of 1100 Hz. In general, the primary signal was correctly detected 75%–90% of the time while signals with frequencies at approximately 150 to 200 Hz on either side of the primary‐signal frequency were detected at the chance level, 50% correct. In as few as three experimental sessions, the observer's frequency‐response characteristic was obtained using the probe‐signal method.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 1968
December 01 1968
Frequency‐Response Characteristic of Auditory Observers Detecting Signals of a Single Frequency in Noise: The Probe‐Signal Method
Gordon Z. Greenberg;
Gordon Z. Greenberg
Hearing Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801
Search for other works by this author on:
Willard D. Larkin
Willard D. Larkin
Hearing Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 44, 1513–1523 (1968)
Article history
Received:
July 05 1968
Citation
Gordon Z. Greenberg, Willard D. Larkin; Frequency‐Response Characteristic of Auditory Observers Detecting Signals of a Single Frequency in Noise: The Probe‐Signal Method. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 December 1968; 44 (6): 1513–1523. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1911290
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Vowel signatures in emotional interjections and nonlinguistic vocalizations expressing pain, disgust, and joy across languages
Maïa Ponsonnet, Christophe Coupé, et al.
The alveolar trill is perceived as jagged/rough by speakers of different languages
Aleksandra Ćwiek, Rémi Anselme, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Frequency Selectivity During Amplitude Discrimination of Signals in Noise
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (June 1969)
Effects of Intensity on “Critical Bands” for Tonal Stimuli as Determined by Band Limiting
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (January 1968)
Distortion and high‐frequency generation due to nonlinear propagation of short ultrasonic pulses from a plane circular piston
J Acoust Soc Am (September 1992)
Discrimination of envelope frequency in one spectral region in the presence of modulation in another
J Acoust Soc Am (September 1994)