Most, if not all, models of binaural hearing predict a dependence of the magnitude of the masking‐level difference (MLD) on signal frequency. Specifically, the size of the MLD is expected to increase as the signal frequency is decreased. The results of many experiments in which signal frequency was varied, however, do not support the above prediction. The magnitude of the MLD appears to decrease at frequencies below 300 cps. The present experiment was designed to re‐examine the decrease in the size of the MLD at low frequencies and to test a qualitative explanation of this phenomenon based on the concept of internal noise. To do so, the size of the MLD in the N0Sπ masking condition and the N0S0 masking condition was estimated relative to the NMSM masking condition at signal frequencies of 150 and 300 cps at several masker spectrum levels. The results indicated that the magnitude of the MLD at both frequencies is dependent upon spectrum level of the masker. The results further indicate that the dependence of the size of the MLD on spectrum level varies as a function of the signal frequency. The size of the MLD at 150 cps is much more sensitive to changes in masker spectrum level than is the MLD at 300 cps. Both results agree with predictions based on the internal noise hypothesis.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 1968
December 01 1968
Effect of Masker Spectrum Level on Masking‐Level Differences at Low Signal Frequencies
Terrence R. Dolan
Terrence R. Dolan
Center for Neural Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47401
Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47401
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 44, 1507–1512 (1968)
Article history
Received:
August 15 1968
Citation
Terrence R. Dolan; Effect of Masker Spectrum Level on Masking‐Level Differences at Low Signal Frequencies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 December 1968; 44 (6): 1507–1512. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1911289
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Day-to-day loudness assessments of indoor soundscapes: Exploring the impact of loudness indicators, person, and situation
Siegbert Versümer, Jochen Steffens, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
Related Content
The Averaged Evoked Response Threshold for Monaural And Binaural Masked Signals
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (January 1971)
Differences in auditory performance between monaural and diotic conditions. I: Masked thresholds in frozen noise
J Acoust Soc Am (June 1992)
Binaural critical masking bands
J Acoust Soc Am (November 1979)
Frequency dependence of the MLD in forward masking
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)
Monaural and diotic detection of tones in wideband and narrow‐band reproducible noise maskers
J Acoust Soc Am (April 2003)