Fatigue and other effects of 3 minutes of strong (105 db) acoustic stimulation were studied. Four combinations of fatiguing sound (white noise or 2‐kc tone) and test frequency (3 or 4 kc) were each used twice for each of 24 Ss. Mean threshold recovery, functions closely resembled many of the individual functions reported by Hirsh and Ward and confirmed the phenomenon they called “bounce” however, many individual functions, like Hood's, were monotonic. Largest inter‐subject and smallest intra‐subject variability were associated with the noise/4000 combination. Ss differed considerably with respect to general fatiguability and recovery rate, and they tended to remain in the same rank order throughout the post‐stimulatory period. There was a positive but low relationship between the fatigue a S displayed under one condition and what he displayed after the same recovery time under another condition; the relationship was generally highest after the first 3 minutes following stimulation. Many individual recovery charts displayed roughness indicative of a recurring disturbance of considerably shorter duration than the bounce effect. There was no obvious relationship between threshold shift and display of either roughness or bounce; nor could these latter two phenomena be entirely accounted for by tinnitus.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 1955
March 01 1955
Contribution to the Study of Auditory Fatigue
Charles Lightfoot
Charles Lightfoot
Audiology Laboratory, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 27, 356–364 (1955)
Article history
Received:
August 16 1954
Citation
Charles Lightfoot; Contribution to the Study of Auditory Fatigue. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 March 1955; 27 (2): 356–364. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1907528
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
Day-to-day loudness assessments of indoor soundscapes: Exploring the impact of loudness indicators, person, and situation
Siegbert Versümer, Jochen Steffens, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Near Field of a Dipole for Measurements in Shallow Lakes
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (December 1966)
Angular Distribution of Lower Room Modes
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (June 1967)
Ratio Scales, Category Scales, and Variability in the Production of Loudness and Softness
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (December 1963)
Perceived roughness of amplitude‐modulated tones and noise
J Acoust Soc Am (December 1976)
Auditory Unmasking
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 1963)