Sixteen English consonants were spoken over voice communication systems with frequency distortion and with random masking noise. The listeners were forced to guess at every sound and a count was made of all the different errors that resulted when one sound was confused with another. With noise or low‐pass filtering the confusions fall into consistent patterns, but with high‐pass filtering the errors are scattered quite randomly. An articulatory analysis of these 16 consonants provides a system of five articulatory features or “dimensions” that serve to characterize and distinguish the different phonemes: voicing, nasality, affrication, duration, and place of articulation. The data indicate that voicing and nasality are little affected and that place is severely affected by low‐pass and noisy systems. The indications are that the perception of any one of these five features is relatively independent of the perception of the others, so that it is as if five separate, simple channels were involved rather than a single complex channel.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 1955
March 01 1955
An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants
George A. Miller;
George A. Miller
Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Search for other works by this author on:
Patricia E. Nicely
Patricia E. Nicely
Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 27, 338–352 (1955)
Article history
Received:
December 01 1954
Connected Content
A correction has been published:
Erratum: An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 27, 339 (1955)]
A companion article has been published:
Speech perception as information processing
Citation
George A. Miller, Patricia E. Nicely; An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 March 1955; 27 (2): 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1907526
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Vowel signatures in emotional interjections and nonlinguistic vocalizations expressing pain, disgust, and joy across languages
Maïa Ponsonnet, Christophe Coupé, et al.
The alveolar trill is perceived as jagged/rough by speakers of different languages
Aleksandra Ćwiek, Rémi Anselme, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Calculations on a Model of the Vocal Tract for Vowel /i/ (Meat) and on the Larynx
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (March 1955)
Log‐linear modeling of consonant confusion data
J Acoust Soc Am (February 1986)
Effects of Stimulus Content and Duration on Talker Identification
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (December 1966)
A thermophysical study of the melting process in alkyl chain metal n-alkanoates: The thallium (I) series
J. Chem. Phys. (August 1999)
Confusion effects with sinusoidal and narrow‐band noise forward maskers
J Acoust Soc Am (May 1986)