If a communication engineer, confronted with a sound wave consisting of speech mixed with audible random noise, were requested to build a device to separate the speech from the noise, he would be hard pressed to produce a mechanism as effective as the human auditory system. But if he were given two waves, one a sample of speech plus a sample of random noise, the other the same speech minus the noise, he would invoke the elementary mathematical (or electronic) processes of addition and subtraction and oblige in short order with noise‐free speech and with speech‐free noise.
This paper examines the performance of the (binaural) human auditory system in handling the two‐wave problem. The effectiveness of the solution is judged in terms of the intelligibility of speech heard against a background of white noise. If monaural intelligibility is taken as a standard of comparison, it is found that the advantage of binaural presentation of the speech and the noise depends upon the interaural phase relations. The auditory system handles best the problems that are easiest for the engineer, though not as effectively as the engineer would handle them. Intelligibility is highest with noise plus speech in one ear, noise minus speech (i.e., the noise wave plus the inverted speech wave) in the other. Words are understood almost, but not exactly, as well with speech plus noise in one ear, speech minus noise (i.e., the speech wave plus the inverted noise wave) in the other.
These modes of presentation, in which either the speech waves or the noise waves in the two ears are 180 degrees out of phase, yield word articulation scores as much as 25 percentage units higher than the more conventional mode of presentation in which both the speech waves and the noise waves in the two ears are in phase. Observations with other interaural phase relations and with monaural‐binaural presentation of speech and noise are also described.
The results suggest a means of providing a small but probably significant improvement in reception whenever speech is heard through earphones in the presence of ambient noise. The scheme is simply to reverse the connections of one of the earphones.
The significance of the results for the theory of masking is discussed.
