Sensitivity to changes in the intensity of a random noise was determined over a wide range of intensities. The just detectable increment in the intensity of the noise is of the same order of magnitude as the just detectable increment in the intensity of pure tones. For intensities more than 30 db above the threshold of hearing for noise the size in decibels of the increment which can be heard 50 percent of the time is approximately constant (0.41 db). When the results of the experiment are regarded as measures of the masking of a noise by the noise itself, it can be shown that functions which describe intensity discrimination also describe the masking by white noise of pure tones and of speech. It is argued, therefore, that the determination of differential sensitivity to intensity is a special case of the more general masking experiment. The loudness of the noise was also determined, and just noticeable differences are shown to be unequal in subjective magnitude. A just noticeable difference at a low intensity produces a much smaller change in the apparent loudness than does a just noticeable difference at a high intensity.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
July 1947
July 01 1947
Sensitivity to Changes in the Intensity of White Noise and Its Relation to Masking and Loudness
George A. Miller
George A. Miller
Psycho‐Acoustic Laboratory, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 19, 609–619 (1947)
Article history
Received:
March 17 1947
Citation
George A. Miller; Sensitivity to Changes in the Intensity of White Noise and Its Relation to Masking and Loudness. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 July 1947; 19 (4): 609–619. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1916528
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Vowel signatures in emotional interjections and nonlinguistic vocalizations expressing pain, disgust, and joy across languages
Maïa Ponsonnet, Christophe Coupé, et al.
The alveolar trill is perceived as jagged/rough by speakers of different languages
Aleksandra Ćwiek, Rémi Anselme, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Operating Characteristics from Yes‐No and Forced‐Choice Procedures
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 1966)
Low‐frequency acoustic backscattering by volumetric inhomogeneities in deep‐ocean sediments
J Acoust Soc Am (July 1995)
Wavefront amplitude distribution in the female breast
J Acoust Soc Am (July 1994)
A quantitative study of cochlear potentials along the scala media of the guinea pig
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (September 1973)
The Ear as a Frequency Analyzer
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (September 1964)