Listener-oriented accounts of phonetic enhancement propose that talkers produce enhanced vowels to increase clarity when their interlocutor might experience communicative difficulty, e.g., for non-native interlocutors or for an unpredictable word given the semantic context. While style-driven enhancement has been shown to be a listener-oriented modification, it is less clear if semantic predictability effects are implemented by the same mechanism. Using three listener conditions, in which listeners varied in language proficiency, and two predictability contexts, the current study investigated how talkers tailor their speech to accommodate the varying proficiencies of their listeners and to what extent semantic predictability effects can interact with listener-oriented processes. Talkers produced longer and more dispersed vowels when talking to the low-proficiency non-native listener relative to the native and high-proficiency non-native listeners. Further, vowels were longer in low predictability contexts relative to high predictability contexts. Finally, talkers increased vowel F2 in low predictability contexts relative to high predictability contexts only for the low-proficiency non-native listener. No differences were found for the native and high-proficiency non-native listeners. The findings suggest that assessment of listeners' needs affects phonetic enhancement, and listener-oriented processes may influence predictability effects for at least some acoustic measures in some conditioning contexts.

1.
Aoki
,
N. B.
, and
Zellou
,
G.
(
2024
). “
Being clear about clear speech: Intelligibility of hard-of-hearing-directed, non-native-directed, and casual speech for L1-and L2-English listeners
,”
J. Phon.
104
,
101328
.
2.
Aylett
,
M.
, and
Turk
,
A.
(
2004
). “
The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: A functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech
,”
Lang. Speech
47
(
1
),
31
56
.
3.
Aylett
,
M.
, and
Turk
,
A.
(
2006
). “
Language redundancy predicts syllabic duration and the spectral characteristics of vocalic syllable nuclei
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
119
,
3048
3058
.
4.
Baese-Berk
,
M.
, and
Goldrick
,
M.
(
2009
). “
Mechanisms of interaction in speech production
,”
Lang. Cognit. Process.
24
,
527
554
.
5.
Baker
,
R. E.
, and
Bradlow
,
A. R.
(
2009
). “
Variability in word duration as a function of probability, speech style, and prosody
,”
Lang. Speech
52
,
391
413
.
6.
Bard
,
E. G.
,
Anderson
,
A. H.
,
Sotillo
,
C.
,
Aylett
,
M.
,
Doherty-Sneddon
,
G.
, and
Newlands
,
A.
(
2000
). “
Controlling the intelligibility of referring expressions in dialogue
,”
J. Mem. Lang.
42
,
1
22
.
7.
Barr
,
D. J.
,
Levy
,
R.
,
Scheepers
,
C.
, and
Tily
,
H. J.
(
2013
). “
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal
,”
J. Mem. Lang.
68
(
3
),
255
278
.
8.
Bates
,
D.
,
Mächler
,
M.
,
Bolker
,
B.
, and
Walker
,
S.
(
2015
). “
Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4
,”
J. Stat. Softw.
67
(
1
),
1
48
.
9.
Beattie
,
G. W.
, and
Butterworth
,
B. L.
(
1979
). “
Contextual probability and word frequency as determinants of pauses and errors in spontaneous speech
,”
Lang. Speech
22
(
3
),
201
211
.
10.
Beilock
,
S. L.
, and
Carr
,
T. H.
(
2001
). “
On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure?
,”
J. Exp. Psychol.: General
130
(
4
),
701
725
.
11.
Bell
,
A.
,
Brenier
,
J. M.
,
Gregory
,
M.
,
Girand
,
C.
, and
Jurafsky
,
D.
(
2009
). “
Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English
,”
J. Mem. Lang.
60
,
92
111
.
12.
Boersma
,
P.
, and
Weenik
,
D.
(
2023
). “
Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 6.3.20)
,” [computer program], https://www.praat.org/.
13.
Burdin
,
R. S.
,
Turnbull
,
R.
, and
Clopper
,
C. G.
(
2015
). “
Interactions among lexical and discourse characteristics in vowel production
,”
Proc. Mtgs. Acoust.
22
,
060005
.
14.
Burnham
,
D.
,
Kitamura
,
C.
, and
Vollmer-Conna
,
U.
(
2002
). “
What's new, pussycat? On talking to babies and animals
,”
Science
296
,
1435
.
15.
Clopper
,
C. G.
,
Mitsch
,
J. F.
, and
Tamati
,
T. N.
(
2017
). “
Effects of phonetic reduction and regional dialect on vowel production
,”
J. Phon.
60
,
38
59
.
16.
Clopper
,
C. G.
, and
Pierrehumbert
,
J. B.
(
2008
). “
Effects of semantic predictability and regional dialect on vowel space reduction
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
124
,
1682
1688
.
17.
Clopper
,
C. G.
, and
Turnbull
,
R.
(
2018
). “
Exploring variation in phonetic reduction: Linguistic, social, and cognitive factors
,” in
Rethinking Reduction: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Conditions, Mechanisms, and Domains for Phonetic Variation
, edited by
F.
Cangemi
,
M.
Clayards
,
O.
Niebuhr
,
B.
Schuppler
, and
M.
Zellers
(
Berlin
,
Mouton de Gruyter
), pp.
25
72
.
18.
Cohen
,
G.
, and
Faulkner
,
D.
(
1983
). “
Word recognition: Age differences in contextual facilitation effects
,”
Br. J. Psychol.
74
(
2
),
239
251
.
19.
Cooke
,
M.
, and
Lu
,
Y.
(
2010
). “
Spectral and temporal changes to speech produced in the presence of energetic and informational maskers
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
128
(
4
),
2059
2069
.
20.
Ferguson
,
S. H.
, and
Kewley-Port
,
D.
(
2002
). “
Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
112
(
1
),
259
271
.
21.
Ferguson
,
S. H.
, and
Kewley-Port
,
D.
(
2007
). “
Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: Acoustic characteristics of vowels
,”
J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res.
50
,
1241
1255
.
22.
Ferguson
,
S. H.
,
Morgan
,
S. D.
, and
Hunter
,
E. J.
(
2024
). “
Within-talker and within-session stability of acoustic characteristics of conversational and clear speaking styles
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
155
(
1
),
44
55
.
23.
Fernald
,
A.
, and
Kuhl
,
P.
(
1987
). “
Acoustic determinants of infant preference for motherese speech
,”
Infant Behav. Dev.
10
,
279
293
.
24.
Fisher
,
C.
, and
Tokura
,
H.
(
1995
). “
The given-new contract in speech to infants
,”
J. Mem. Lang.
34
,
287
310
.
25.
Fourakis
,
M.
(
1991
). “
Tempo, stress, and vowel reduction in American English
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
90
,
1816
1827
.
26.
Fowler
,
C. A.
, and
Housum
,
J.
(
1987
). “
Talkers' signalling of ‘new’ and ‘old’ words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction
,”
J. Mem. Lang.
26
,
489
504
.
27.
Gahl
,
S.
(
2015
). “
Lexical competition in vowel articulation revisited: Vowel dispersion in the Easy/ Hard database
,”
J. Phon.
49
,
96
116
.
28.
Gahl
,
S.
,
Yao
,
Y.
, and
Johnson
,
K.
(
2012
). “
Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech
,”
Mem. Lang.
66
(
4
),
789
806
.
29.
Griffin
,
Z. M.
(
1995
). “
The locus of the word frequency effect in language production
,” in the
67th Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association
,
Chicago
, IL.
30.
Griffin
,
Z. M.
, and
Bock
,
K.
(
1998
). “
Constraint, word frequency, and the relationship between lexical processing levels in spoken word production
,”
J. Mem. Lang.
38
(
3
),
313
338
.
31.
Hazan
,
V.
, and
Baker
,
R.
(
2011
). “
Acoustic-phonetic characteristics of speech produced with communicative intent to counter adverse listening conditions
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
130
,
2139
2152
.
32.
Hazan
,
V.
,
Uther
,
M.
, and
Grunland
,
S.
(
2015
). “
How does foreigner-directed speech differ from other forms of listener-directed clear speaking styles?
,” in
Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences
.
33.
Ibrahim
,
O.
,
Yuen
,
I.
,
van Os
,
M.
,
Andreeva
,
B.
, and
Möbius
,
B.
(
2022
). “
The combined effects of contextual predictability and noise on the acoustic realisation of German syllables
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
152
(
2
),
911
920
.
34.
Jian
,
H.-L.
, and
Konopka
,
R.
(
2012
). “
EFL conversational triads: Foreigner-directed speech and hyperarticulation
,” in
Proceedings of Interspeech
, pp.
122
125
.
35.
Jurafsky
,
D.
,
Bell
,
A.
,
Gregory
,
M.
, and
Raymond
,
W. D.
(
2001
). “
Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production
,” in
Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure
, edited by
J.
Bybee
and
P.
Hopper
(
Benjamins
,
Amsterdam
), pp.
229
254
.
36.
Kalikow
,
D. N.
,
Stevens
,
K. N.
, and
Elliott
,
L. L.
(
1977
). “
Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
61
,
1337
1351
.
37.
Kim
,
J.
, and
Davis
,
C.
(
2014
). “
Comparing the consistency and distinctiveness of speech produced in quiet and in noise
,”
Comput. Speech Lang.
28
,
598
606
.
38.
Krause
,
J. C.
, and
Braida
,
L. D.
(
2004
). “
Acoustic properties of naturally produced clear speech at normal speaking rates
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
115
(
1
),
362
378
.
39.
Kuznetsova
,
A.
,
Brockhoff
,
P. B.
, and
Christensen
,
R. H. B.
(
2017
). “
lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models
,”
J. Stat. Softw.
82
(
13
),
1
26
.
40.
Lam
,
T. Q.
, and
Watson
,
D. G.
(
2010
). “
Repetition is easy: Why repeated referents have reduced prominence
,”
Mem. Cogn.
38
,
1137
1146
.
41.
Lam
,
T. Q.
, and
Watson
,
D. G.
(
2014
). “
Repetition reduction: Lexical repetition in the absence of referent repetition
,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn.
40
(
3
),
829
843
.
42.
Lee
,
D.-Y.
, and
Baese-Berk
,
M. M.
(
2020
). “
The maintenance of clear speech in naturalistic conversations
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
147
,
3702
3711
.
43.
Lieberman
,
P.
(
1963
). “
Some effects of semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech
,”
Lang. Speech
6
,
172
187
.
44.
Lindblom
,
B.
(
1990
). “
Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H & H theory
,” in
Speech Production and Speech Modelling
, edited by
W. J.
Hardcastle
and
A.
Marchal
(
Kluwer
,
Dordrecht
), pp.
403
439
.
45.
Ma
,
D. S.
,
Correll
,
J.
, and
Wittenbrink
,
B.
(
2015
). “
The Chicago Face Database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data
,”
Behav. Res.
47
,
1122
1135
.
46.
McGowan
,
K. B.
(
2015
). “
Social expectation improves speech perception in noise
,”
Lang. Speech
58
(
4
),
502
521
.
47.
Miller
,
G. A.
, and
Isard
,
S.
(
1963
). “
Some perceptual consequences of linguistic rules
,”
J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav.
2
,
217
228
.
48.
Moon
,
S.-J.
, and
Lindblom
,
B.
(
1994
). “
Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
96
,
40
55
.
49.
Munson
,
B.
, and
Solomon
,
N. P.
(
2004
). “
The effect of phonological neighborhood density on vowel articulation
,”
J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res.
47
,
1048
1058
.
50.
Ngo
,
T. V.
,
Kubo
,
R.
,
Morikawa
,
D.
, and
Akagi
,
M.
(
2017
). “
Acoustical analyses of tendencies of intelligibility in Lombard speech with different background noise levels
,”
J. Sign. Process.
21
(
4
),
171
174
.
51.
Peterson
,
G. E.
, and
Lehiste
,
I.
(
1960
). “
Duration of syllable nuclei in English
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
32
,
693
703
.
52.
Picheny
,
M. A.
,
Durlach
,
N. I.
, and
Braida
,
L. D.
(
1986
). “
Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech
,”
J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res.
29
,
434
445
.
53.
R Core Team
(
2022
). “
R: A language and environment for statistical computing
” (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
54.
Rodriguez-Cuadrado
,
S.
,
Baus
,
C.
, and
Costa
,
A.
(
2018
). “
Foreigner talk through word reduction in native/non-native spoken interactions
,”
Bilingualism
21
(
2
),
419
426
.
55.
Scarborough
,
R.
(
2010
). “
Lexical and contextual predictability: Confluent effects on the production of vowels
,” in
Laboratory Phonology 10
, edited by
C.
Fougeron
,
B.
Kühnert
,
M.
D'Imperio
, and
N.
Vallée
(
De Gruyter Mouton
,
Berlin
), pp.
557
586
.
56.
Scarborough
,
R.
,
Brenier
,
J.
,
Zhao
,
Y.
,
Hall-Lew
,
L.
, and
Dmitrieva
,
O.
(
2007
). “
An acoustic study of real and imagined foreigner-directed speech
,” in
Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences
.
57.
Scarborough
,
R.
, and
Zellou
,
G.
(
2013
). “
Clarity in communication: ‘Clear’ speech authenticity and lexical neighborhood density effects in speech production and perception
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
134
(
5
),
3793
3807
.
58.
Smiljanić
,
R.
, and
Bradlow
,
A. R.
(
2005
). “
Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
118
(
3
),
1677
1688
.
59.
Smiljanić
,
R.
, and
Bradlow
,
A.
(
2009
). “
Speaking and hearing clearly: Talker and listener factors in speaking style changes
,”
Lang. Ling. Compass
3
(
1
),
236
264
.
60.
Tippenhauer
,
N.
,
Fourakis
,
E. R.
,
Watson
,
D. G.
, and
Lew-Williams
,
C.
(
2020
). “
The scope of audience design in child-directed speech: Parents' tailoring of word lengths for adult versus child listeners
,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn.
46
(
11
),
2163
2178
.
61.
Traunmüller
,
H.
(
1990
). “
Analytical expressions for the tonotopic sensory scale
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
88
,
97
100
.
62.
Turnbull
,
R.
(
2017
). “
The role of predictability in intonational variability
,”
Lang. Speech
60
,
123
153
.
63.
Turnbull
,
R.
(
2019
). “
Listener-oriented phonetic reduction and theory of mind
,”
Lang. Cogn. Neurosci.
34
(
6
),
747
768
.
64.
Turnbull
,
R.
, and
Clopper
,
C. G.
(
2013
). “
Effects of semantic predictability and dialect variation on vowel production in clear and plain lab speech
,”
Proc. Mtgs. Acoust.
19
,
060116
.
65.
Uchanski
,
R. M.
(
2005
). “
Clear speech
,” in
The Handbook of Speech Perception
, edited by
D. B.
Pisoni
and
R.
Remez
(
Blackwell
,
Malden
), pp.
207
235
.
66.
Uther
,
M.
,
Knoll
,
M.
, and
Burnham
,
D.
(
2007
). “
Do you speak E-NG-LI-SH? A comparison of foreigner- and infant-directed speech
,”
Speech Commun.
49
,
2
7
.
67.
Watson
,
D. G.
,
Arnold
,
J. E.
, and
Tanenhaus
,
M. K.
(
2008
). “
Tic tac TOE: Effects of predictability and importance on acoustic prominence in language production
,”
Cognition
106
,
1548
1557
.
68.
Wright
,
R.
(
2004
). “
Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation
,” in
Phonetic Interpretation: Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI
, edited by
J.
Local
,
R.
Ogden
, and
R.
Temple
(
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
), pp.
75
86
.
You do not currently have access to this content.