Accentuation is encoded by both durational and pitch cues in French. While previous research agrees that the sole presence of pitch cues is sufficient to encode accentuation in French, the role of durational cues is less clear. In four cue-weighting accent perception experiments, we examined the role of pitch and durational cues in French listeners' perception of accentuation. French listeners were tested on acoustic continua ranging from an unaccented first syllable [deplaˈse] “moved” to an accented first syllable [ˈde] [plaˈse] “a dice placed.” The continua were obtained by manipulating pitch and durational cues either separately or conjointly. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants identified each step of the continuum by choosing between two possible segmentations while in Experiments 3 and 4, participants performed an AX discrimination task on two adjacent steps. Results indicate that participants' performance was better when pitch cues were varied compared to when durational cues were varied in both the identification and discrimination tasks. In addition, while participants always benefited from the additional presence of pitch cues, participants did not consistently benefit from the additional presence of durational cues. Together, these results suggest that pitch cues are a better marker of French accentuation than durational cues.

1.
Abramson
,
A.
, and
Lisker
,
L.
(
1985
). “
Relative power of cues: F0 shift versus voice timing
,” in
Phonetic Linguistics: Essays in Honor of Peter Ladefoged
, edited by
V.
Fromkin
(
Academic
,
New York)
, pp.
25
33
.
2.
Baayen
,
R. H.
,
Davidson
,
D. J.
, and
Bates
,
D. M.
(
2008
). “
Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items
,”
J. Mem. Lang.
59
(
4
),
390
412
.
3.
Bagou
,
O.
,
Fougeron
,
C.
, and
Frauenfelder
,
U.
(
2002
). “
Contribution of prosody to the segmentation and storage of ‘words’ in the acquisition of a new mini-language
” in
Proceedings of the
Speech Prosody 2002 Conference
, pp.
59
62
.
4.
Bagou
,
O.
, and
Frauenfelder
,
U. H.
(
2006
). “
Stratégie de segmentation prosodique: Rôle des proéminences initiales et finales dans l'acquisition d'une langue artificielle
” (“Prosodic segmentation strategy: Role of initial and final prominences in acquisition of an artificial language”), in
Proceedings of the XXVIèmes Journées D'Etude Sur la Parole
, pp.
571
574
.
5.
Bagou
,
O.
, and
Frauenfelder
,
U. H.
(
2018
). “
Lexical segmentation in artificial word learning: The effects of converging sublexical cues
,”
Lang. Speech
61
(
1
),
3
30
.
6.
Banel
,
M. H.
, and
Bacri
,
N.
(
1994
). “
On metrical patterns and lexical parsing in French
,”
Speech Commun.
15
(
1
),
115
126
.
7.
Barr
,
D. J.
,
Levy
,
R.
,
Scheepers
,
C.
, and
Tily
,
H. J.
(
2013
). “
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal
,”
J. Mem. Lang.
68
(
3
),
255
278
.
8.
Bates
,
D.
,
Maechler
,
M.
,
Bolker
,
B.
, and
Walker
,
S.
(
2015
). “
Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4
,”
J. Stat. Softw.
67
(
1
),
1
48
.
9.
Beckman
,
M. E.
, and
Edwards
,
J.
(
1994
). “
Articulatory evidence for differentiating stress categories
,” in
Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form: Papers in Laboratory Phonology III
, edited by
P. A.
Keating
(
Cambridge University
,
Cambridge, UK
), pp.
7
33
.
10.
Beckman
,
M. E.
, and
Pierrehumbert
,
J.
(
1986
). “
Intonational structure in English and Japanese
,”
Phonol. Yearb.
3
,
255
310
.
11.
Boersma
,
P.
, and
Weenink
,
D.
(
2024
). “
Praat: Doing phonetics by computer
” (version 6.4.20) [computer program], http://www.praat.org/ (Last viewed September 18, 2024).
12.
Brown
,
M. E.
,
Salverda
,
A. P.
,
Dilley
,
L. C.
, and
Tanenhaus
,
M. K.
(
2015
). “
Metrical expectations from preceding prosody influence perception of lexical stress
,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.
41
,
306
323
.
13.
Christophe
,
A.
,
Peperkamp
,
S.
,
Pallier
,
C.
,
Block
,
E.
, and
Mehler
,
J.
(
2004
). “
Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access: I. Adult data
,”
J. Mem. Lang.
51
(
4
),
523
547
.
14.
Delais-Roussarie
,
E.
,
Post
,
B.
,
Avanzi
,
M.
,
Buthke
,
C.
,
Di Cristo
,
C.
,
Feldhausen
,
I.
, and
Yoo
,
H.
(
2015
). “
Developing a ToBI system for French
,” in
Intonation in Romance
, edited by
S.
Frota
and
P.
Prieto
(
Oxford University Press
,
Oxford
, UK).
15.
Fry
,
D. B.
(
1958
). “
Experiments in the perception of stress
,”
Lang. Speech
1
(
2
),
126
152
.
16.
Fox
,
J.
(
2016
).
Applied Regression Analysis and Generalized Linear Models
, 3rd ed. (
Sage
,
Thousand Oaks, CA
).
17.
Francis
,
A. L.
,
Kaganovich
,
N.
, and
Driscoll-Huber
,
C.
(
2008
). “
Cue-specific effects of categorization training on the relative weighting of acoustic cues to consonant voicing in English
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
124
(
2
),
1234
1251
.
18.
Gay
,
T.
(
1978
). “
Physiological and acoustic correlates of perceived stress
,”
Lang. Speech
21
,
347
353
.
19.
Idemaru
,
K.
,
Holt
,
L. L.
, and
Seltman
,
H.
(
2012
). “
Individual differences in cue weights are stable across time: The case of Japanese stop lengths
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
132
(
6
),
3950
3964
.
20.
Jun
,
S. A.
, and
Fougeron
,
C.
(
2002
). “
Realizations of accentual phrase in French
,”
Probus
14
,
147
172
.
21.
Klatt
,
D. H.
(
1976
). “
Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
59
(
5
),
1208
1221
.
22.
Koffi
,
E.
(
2018
). “
A Just Noticeable Difference (JND) reanalysis of Fry's original acoustic correlates of stress in American English
,”
Linguistic Portfolios
7
(
1
),
2
.
23.
Lindblom
,
B.
(
1963
). “
Spectrographic study of vowel reduction
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
35
,
783
.
24.
Lisker
,
L.
(
1986
). “ 
‘Voicing’ in English: A catalogue of acoustic features signaling/b/versus/p/in trochees
,”
Lang. Speech
29
(
1
),
3
11
.
25.
Michelas
,
A.
, and
D'Imperio
,
M.
(
2012
). “
When syntax meets prosody: Tonal and duration variability in French accentual phrases
,”
J. Phonetics
40
(
6
),
816
829
.
26.
Michelas
,
A.
, and
D'Imperio
,
M.
(
2015
). “
Prosodic boundary strength guides syntactic parsing of French utterances
,”
Lab. Phonol.
6
(
1
),
119
146
.
27.
Moulines
,
E.
, and
Charpentier
,
F.
(
1990
). “
Pitch-synchronous waveform processing techniques for text-to-speech synthesis using diphones
,”
Speech Commun.
9
(
5
),
453
467
.
28.
Pallier
,
C.
(
2002
). “
Computing discriminability and bias with the R software
,” http://www.pallier.org/ressources/aprime/aprime.
29.
Petrone
,
C.
,
Truckenbrodt
,
H.
,
Wellmann
,
C.
,
Holzgrefe-Lang
,
J.
,
Wartenburger
,
I.
, and
Höhle
,
B.
(
2017
). “
Prosodic boundary cues in German: Evidence from the production and perception of bracketed lists
,”
J. Phonetics
61
,
71
92
.
30.
R Core Team
(
2022
). “
R: A language and environment for statistical computing
,” https://www.R-project.org/.
31.
Rietveld
,
A. C. M.
(
1980
). “
Word boundaries in the French language
,”
Lang. Speech
23
(
3
),
289
296
.
32.
Schertz
,
J.
, and
Clare
,
E. J.
(
2020
). “
Phonetic cue weighting in perception and production
,”
Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci.
11
(
2
),
e1521
.
33.
Sluijter
,
A. M. C.
, and
van Heuven
,
V. J.
(
1996
). “
Acoustic correlates of linguistic stress and accent in Dutch and American English
,” in
Proceedings of Fourth International Congress on Spoken Language Processing
, October 3–6,
Newark, DE
.
34.
Smith
,
C. L.
,
Erickson
,
D.
, and
Savariaux
,
C.
(
2019
). “
Articulatory and acoustic correlates of prominence in French: Comparing L1 and L2 speakers
,”
J. Phonetics
77
,
100938
.
35.
Tremblay
,
A.
,
Broersma
,
M.
,
Coughlin
,
C. E.
, and
Choi
,
J.
(
2016
). “
Effects of the native language on the learning of fundamental frequency in second-language speech segmentation
,”
Front. Psychol.
7
,
985
.
36.
Tremblay
,
A.
,
Coughlin
,
C. E.
,
Bahler
,
C.
, and
Gaillard
,
S.
(
2012
). “
Differential contribution of prosodic cues in the native and non-native segmentation of French speech
,”
Lab. Phonol.
3
(
2
),
385
423
.
37.
Tremblay
,
A.
,
Namjoshi
,
J.
,
Spinelli
,
E.
,
Broersma
,
M.
,
Cho
,
T.
,
Kim
,
S.
,
Martinez-Garcia
,
M. T.
, and
Connell
,
K.
(
2017
). “
Experience with a second language affects the use of fundamental frequency in speech segmentation
,”
PLoS One.
12
(
7
),
e0181709
.
38.
Tyler
,
M.
, and
Fenwick
,
S.
(
2012
). “
Perceptual assimilation of Arabic voiceless fricatives by English monolinguals
,” in
Proceedings of Interspeech
, September 9-13,
Portland, OR
, pp.
911
914
.
39.
Tyler
,
M. D.
, and
Cutler
,
A.
(
2009
). “
Cross-language differences in cue use for speech segmentation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
126
(
1
),
367
376
.
40.
van Heuven
,
V. J.
, and
de Jonge
,
M.
(
2011
). “
Spectral and temporal reduction as stress cues in Dutch
,”
Phonetica
68
(
3
),
120
132
.
41.
Welby
,
P.
(
2006
). “
French intonational structure: Evidence from tonal alignment
,”
J. Phonetics
34
(
3
),
343
371
.
42.
Zhang
,
Y.
, and
Francis
,
A.
(
2010
). “
The weighting of vowel quality in native and non-native listeners' perception of English lexical stress
,”
J. Phonetics.
38
,
260
271
.
You do not currently have access to this content.