In classical singing, there are often problems with the intelligibility of sung text. The present study aims to test the hypotheses that (1) in loud operatic singing, compared with speaking, the intensity of voiceless plosives increases less than the intensity of vowels, leading to poorer recognition of plosives; and (2) pronouncing the plosive bursts with greater intensity improves their recognition. The acoustic analysis of nine opera arias in Italian from the Classical and Romantic periods performed by ten classically trained singers showed that the average difference in the intensity of vowels when sung and spoken was 14.6 dB [standard deviation (SD) = 7.2 dB], while the difference in the intensity of voiceless plosive bursts was only 6.6 dB (SD = 6 dB). In a perception test with 73 participants, increasing the intensity of the plosive bursts generally improved the recognition of plosives in the sung /a–plosive–a/ sequences, but mainly when reverberation and/or pink noise imitating instrumental accompaniments were added to the stimuli. At the same time, recognition of plosives was often better than chance even when the plosive burst was missing and replaced by silence.
REFERENCES
1.
Adams
,
D.
(2008
). Handbook of Diction for Singers. Italian, German, French
(
Oxford University Press
,
Oxford, New York
).2.
Appelman
,
D. R.
(1986
). The Science of Vocal Pedagogy: Theory and Application
(
Indiana University Press
,
Bloomington, IN
), pp. 171
–172
.3.
Behrman
,
A.
(2018
). Speech and Voice Science
, 3rd. ed.
(
Plural Publishing Inc
.,
San Diego, CA
).4.
Bloem-Hubatka
,
D.
(2012
). The Old Italian School of Singing: A Theoretical and Practical Guide
(
McFarland and Company
,
Jefferson, NC
).5.
Boersma
,
P.
, and
Weenink
,
D.
(2022
). “
Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 6.3.02) [computer program]
,” http://www.praat.org (Last viewed October 18, 2022).6.
7.
Bunch
,
M.
, and
Chapman
,
J.
(2000
). “
Taxonomy of singers used as subjects in scientific research
,” J. Voice
14
, 363
–369
.8.
Christy
,
V. A.
(1967
). Expressive Singing. Volume 1. Basic Principles. A Text for School or Studio Class or Private Teaching
(
W. C. Brown Publishing Co
.,
Dubuque, IA
).9.
Collister
,
L. B.
, and
Huron
,
D.
(2008
). “
Comparison of word intelligibility in spoken and sung phrases
,” Empir. Musicol. Rev.
3
, 109
–125
.10.
Corretge
,
R.
(2012–2023
). “
Praat vocal toolkit [computer program]
,” https://www.praatvocaltoolkit.com/index.html (Last viewed October 18, 2023).11.
Deme
,
A.
(2014
). “
Intelligibility of sung vowels: The effect of consonantal context and the onset of voicing
,” J. Voice
28
, 523.E19
–523.E25
.12.
Di Carlo
,
N. S.
(2007
). “
Effect of multifactorial constraints on opera-singing intelligibility (I)
,” J. Sing.
63
, 443
–455
.13.
Di Carlo
,
N. S.
, and
Germain
,
A.
(1985
). “
A perceptual study of the influence of pitch on the intelligibility of sung vowels
,” Phonetica
42
, 188
–197
.14.
Eek
,
A.
, and
Meister
,
E.
(1996
). “
Eesti sõnaalguliste sulghäälikute akustika ja tajumine
” (“Acoustics and perception of Estonian word-initial plosives),” Keel ja Kirjandus 3
, 164
–170
.15.
Fine
,
P. A.
, and
Ginsborg
,
J.
(2014
). “
Making myself understood: Perceived factors affecting the intelligibility of sung text
,” Front. Psychol.
5
, 809
.16.
17.
Friberg
,
A.
(1991
). “
Generative rules for music performance
,” Comput. Music J.
15
, 56
–71
.18.
Fuchs
,
V.
(1964
). The Art of Singing and Voice Technique
(
London House and Maxwell
,
New York
).19.
Ginsborg
,
J.
(2013
). “
The influence of interactions between music and lyrics: What factors underlie the intelligibility of sung text?
,” Empirical Musicol. Rev.
9
, 21
–24
.20.
Gottfried
,
T. L.
, and
Chew
,
S. L.
(1986
). “
Intelligibility of vowels sung by a countertenor
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
79
, 124
–130
.21.
Grant
,
K. W.
, and
Bernstein
,
J. G. W.
(2019
). “
Toward a model of auditory-visual speech intelligibility
,” in Multisensory Processes, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research
, edited by
A.
Lee
,
M.
Wallace
,
A.
Coffin
,
A.
Popper
, and
R.
Fay
(
Springer
,
New York
), Vol.
68
, pp. 33
–57
.22.
Gregg
,
J. W.
, and
Scherer
,
R. C.
(2006
). “
Vowel intelligibility in classical singing
,” J. Voice
20
, 198
–210
.23.
Harpster
,
R. W.
(1984
). Technique in Singing: A Program for Singers and Teachers
(
Schirmer Books
,
New York
).24.
Hollien
,
H.
,
Mendes-Scwartz
,
A. P.
, and
Nielsen
,
K.
(2000
). “
Perceptual confusions of high-pitched sung vowels
,” J. Voice
14
, 287
–298
.25.
Howard
,
D.
, and
Angus
,
J.
(2006
). Acoustics and Psychoacoustics
, 3rd ed.
(
Routledge
,
New York
).26.
Joliveau
,
E.
,
Smith
,
J.
, and
Wolfe
,
J.
(2004
). “
Vocal tract resonances in singing: The soprano voice
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
116
, 2434
–2439
.27.
Kent
,
R. D.
, and
Read
,
C.
(2002
). The Acoustic Analysis of Speech
(
Delmar
,
Clifton Park, NY
).28.
Marshall
,
M.
(1956
). “
Is exaggeration required for good English diction?
,” Diapason
47
, 18
.29.
Melton
,
J.
(1953
). “
Do you put the words across? An interview by Annabel Comfort
,” Etude, June, 15.30.
Meyer
,
J.
(2009
). Acoustics and the Performance of Music. Manual for Acousticians, Audio Engineers, Musicians, Architects and Musical Instrument Makers
, 5th ed.
(
Springer
,
New York
).31.
Miller
,
R.
(1996
). On the Art of Singing
(
Oxford University Press
,
Oxford, New York
).32.
Qu
,
G.
,
Sun
,
Y.-y.
,
Han
,
B.-q.
,
Yu
,
P.
,
Liu
,
J.-k.
, and
Yang
,
S.-m.
(2020
). “
Preliminary study on lyrics intelligibility at different pitches in Chinese vocal music
,” Acta Otolaryngol.
140
, 558
–563
.33.
Roach
,
P.
(2004
). “
British English: Received pronunciation
,” J. Int. Phon. Assoc.
34
, 239
–245
.34.
35.
Shrout
,
P. E.
, and
Fleiss
,
J. L.
(1979
). “
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability
,” Psychol. Bull.
86
, 420
–428
.36.
Simon
,
E.
, and
Leuschner
,
T.
(2010
). “
Laryngeal systems in Dutch, English, and German: A contrastive phonological study on second and third language acquisition
,” J. Ger. Linguistics
22
, 403
–424
.37.
Smith
,
J.
, and
Wolfe
,
J.
(2009
). “
Vowel-pitch matching in Wagner's operas: Implications for intelligibility and ease of singing
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
125
, EL196
–EL201
.38.
Stevens
,
K. N.
(2000
). Acoustic Phonetics
(
MIT Press
,
Cambridge, MA
).39.
Stoet
,
G.
(2010
). “
PsyToolkit: A software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux
,” Behav. Res. Methods
42
, 1096
–1104
.40.
Stoet
,
G.
(2017
). “
PsyToolkit: A novel web-based method for running online questionnaires and reaction-time experiments
,” Teach. Psychol.
44
, 24
–31
.41.
Sundberg
,
J.
(1987
). The Science of the Singing Voice
(
Northern Illinois University Press
,
DeKalb, IL
).42.
Sundberg
,
J.
, and
Romedahl
,
C.
(2009
). “
Text intelligibility and the singer's formant–a relationship?
,” J. Voice
23
, 539
–545
.43.
Svec
,
J.
, and
Granqvist
,
S.
(2018
). “
Tutorial and guidelines on measurement of sound pressure level in voice and speech
,” J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res.
61
, 441
–461
.44.
Titze
,
I.
(2006
). “
Theoretical analysis of maximum flow declination rate versus maximum area declination rate in phonation
,” J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res.
49
, 439
–447
.45.
46.
Ware
,
C.
(1998
). Basics of Vocal Pedagogy: The Foundations and Process of Singing
(
McGraw-Hill
,
Boston, MA
).47.
Zhang
,
Z.
(2016
). “
Mechanics of human voice production and control
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
140
, 2614
–2635
.© 2023 Acoustical Society of America.
2023
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.