There exists a wealth of knowledge on hearing ability in individual fish species, but the role of interspecific variation, and drivers behind it, remains understudied, making it difficult to understand evolutionary drivers. The current study quantified hearing thresholds for three species of sunfish in the family Centrarchidae [bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus), pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus), and rock bass (Ambloplites rupestris)] using auditory evoked potentials and behavioral trials and saccular otolith size and hair cell density. In auditory physiological experiments, 10-ms tone bursts were played and responses monitored to measure hearing. In behavioral experiments, fish were exposed to the same tone bursts for 1 s, and changes in fish behaviors were monitored. Saccular otolith morphology and hair cell densities were also quantified. Physiological thresholds varied between species, but behavioral thresholds did not. Rock bass had larger S:O ratio (percentage of the saccular otolith surface occupied by the sulcus), but no differences in hair cell densities were found. Our study allows for a direct comparison between confamilial species, allowing a deeper understanding of sound detection abilities and possible mechanisms driving differential hearing. Using both approaches also allows future research into how these species may be impacted by increasing levels of anthropogenic noise.
REFERENCES
1.
Amoser
,
S.
, and
Ladich
,
F.
(2005
). “
Are hearing sensitivities of freshwater fish adapted to the ambient noise in their habitats?
,” J. Exp. Biol.
208
(18
), 3533
–3542
.2.
Arellano
,
R. V.
,
Hamerlynck
,
O.
,
Vincx
,
M.
,
Mees
,
J.
,
Hostens
,
K.
, and
Gijselinck
,
W.
(1995
). “
Changes in the ratio of the sulcus acusticus area to the sagitta area of Pomatoschistus minutus and P. lozanoi (Pisces, Gobiidae)
,” Mar. Biol.
122
(3
), 355
–360
.3.
4.
D'Iglio
,
C.
,
Natale
,
S.
,
Albano
,
M.
,
Savoca
,
S.
,
Famulari
,
S.
,
Gervasi
,
C.
,
Lanteri
,
G.
,
Panarello
,
G.
,
Spanò
,
N.
, and
Capillo
,
G.
(2022
). “
Otolith analyses highlight morpho-functional differences of three species of mullet (Mugilidae) from transitional water
,” Sustainability
14
(1
), 398
–423
.5.
Fay
,
R. R.
, and
Coombs
,
S.
(1983
). “
Neural mechanisms in sound detection and temporal summation
,” Hear. Res.
10
(1
), 69
–92
.6.
Fay
,
R.
, and
Popper
,
A.
(2000
). “
Evolution of hearing in vertebrates: The inner ears and processing
,” Hear. Res.
149
, 1
–10
.7.
Garabon
,
J. R.
, and
Higgs
,
D. M.
(2017
). “
The effects of stimulus parameters on auditory evoked potentials of Carassius auratus
,” J. Comp. Physiol. A
203
, 945
–951
.8.
Gauldie
,
R. W.
(1988
). “
Function, form and time-keeping properties of fish otoliths
,” Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A: Physiol.
91
(2
), 395
–402
.9.
Hawkins
,
A. D.
(1981
). “
The hearing abilities of fish
,” in Hearing and Sound Communication in Fishes (Springer
, New York
), pp. 109
–137
.10.
Higgs
,
D. M.
(2002
). “
Development of the fish auditory system: How do changes in auditory structure affect function?
,” Bioacoustics
12
(2–3
), 180
–183
.11.
Higgs
,
D. M.
, and
Radford
,
C. A.
(2013
). “
The contribution of the lateral line to ‘hearing’ in fish
,” J. Exp. Biol.
216
(8
), 1484
–1490
.12.
Higgs
,
D. M.
,
Souza
,
M. J.
,
Wilkins
,
H. R.
,
Presson
,
J. C.
, and
Popper
,
A. N.
(2002
). “
Age- and size-related changes in the inner ear and hearing ability of the adult zebrafish (Danio rerio)
,” J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.
3
(2
), 174
–184
.13.
Jacobson
,
J. T.
(1985
). “
An overview of the auditory brainstem response
,” in The Auditory Brainstem Response
(
College-Hill
,
Worthing, UK
), pp. 3
–12
.14.
Jewett
,
D. L.
(1970
). “
Volume-conducted potentials in response to auditory stimuli as detected by averaging in the cat
,” Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.
28
(6
), 609
–618
.15.
Jewett
,
D. L.
, and
Williston
,
J. S.
(1971
). “
Auditory-evoked far fields averaged from the scalp of humans
,” Brain
94
(4
), 681
–696
.16.
Kenyon
,
T. N.
,
Ladich
,
F.
, and
Yan
,
H. Y.
(1998
). “
A comparative study of hearing ability in fishes: The auditory brainstem response approach
,” J. Comp. Physiol. A
182
, 307
–318
.17.
Ladich
,
F.
, and
Fay
,
R. R.
(2013
). “
Auditory evoked potential audiometry in fish
,” Rev. Fish Biol. Fish.
23
(3
), 317
–364
.18.
Ladich
,
F.
, and
Schulz-Mirbach
,
T.
(2016
). “
Diversity in fish auditory systems: One of the riddles of sensory biology
,” Front. Ecol. Evol.
4
, 28
–54
.19.
Lagardère
,
J. P.
,
Bégout
,
M. L.
,
Lafaye
,
J. Y.
, and
Villotte
,
J. P.
(1994
). “
Influence of wind-produced noise on orientation in the sole (Solea solea)
,” Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.
51
(6
), 1258
–1264
.20.
Lombarte
,
A.
(1992
). “
Changes in otolith area: Sensory area ratio with body size and depth
,” Environ. Biol. Fish.
33
(4
), 405
–410
.21.
Lychakov
,
D. V.
, and
Rebane
,
Y. T.
(1992
). “
Effect of otolith shape on directional sound perception in fish
,” J. Evol. Biochem. Physiol.
28
, 531
–536
.22.
Lychakov
,
D. V.
, and
Rebane
,
Y. T.
(2000
). “
Otolith regularities
,” Hear. Res.
143
(1
), 83
–102
.23.
Mickle
,
M.
, and
Higgs
,
D.
(2017
). “
Integrating techniques: A review of the effects of anthropogenic noise on freshwater fish
,” Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.
75
(9
), 1534
–1541
.24.
Montanini
,
S.
,
Stagioni
,
M.
,
Valdrè
,
G.
,
Tommasini
,
S.
, and
Vallisneri
,
M.
(2015
). “
Intra-specific and inter-specific variability of the sulcus acusticus of sagittal otoliths in two gurnard species (Scorpaeniformes, Triglidae)
,” Fish. Res.
161
, 93
–101
.25.
Monteiro
,
L. R.
,
Beneditto
,
A. P. M. D.
,
Guillermo
,
L. H.
, and
Rivera
,
L. A.
(2005
). “
Allometric changes and shape differentiation of sagitta otoliths in sciaenid fishes
,” Fish. Res.
74
(1
), 288
–299
.26.
Nedelec
,
S. L.
,
Campbell
,
J.
,
Radford
,
A. N.
,
Simpson
,
S. D.
, and
Merchant
,
N. D.
(2016
). “
Particle motion: The missing link in underwater acoustic ecology
,” Methods Ecol. Evol.
7
(7
), 836
–842
.27.
Osman
,
Y. A. A.
,
Mahé
,
K.
,
El-Mahdy
,
S. M.
,
Mohammad
,
A. S.
, and
Mehanna
,
S. F.
(2021
). “
Relationship between body and otolith morphological characteristics of sabre squirrelfish (Sargocentron spiniferum) from the Southern Red Sea: Difference between right and left otoliths
,” Oceans
2
(3
), 624
–633
.28.
Pieniazek
,
R. H.
,
Mickle
,
M. F.
, and
Higgs
,
D. M.
(2020
). “
Comparative analysis of noise effects on wild and captive freshwater fish behaviour
,” Anim. Behav.
168
, 129
–135
.29.
Platt
,
C.
, and
Popper
,
A. N.
(1981
). “
Fine structure and function of the ear
,” in Hearing and Sound Communication in Fishes
, edited by
W. N.
Tavolga
,
A. N.
Popper
, and
R. R.
Fay
(
Springer
,
New York
), pp. 3
–38
.30.
Poggendorf
,
D.
(1952
). “
Die absoluten Hörschwellen des Zwergwelses (Amiurus nebulosus) und Beiträge zur Physik des Weberschen Apparates der Ostariophysen” [“The absolute threshold of hearing of the bullhead (Amiurus nebulosus) and contributions to the physics of the Weberian apparatus of the Ostariophysi”]
, Z. Vergl. Physiol.
34
, 222
–257
.31.
Popper
,
A. N.
(1972
). “
Auditory threshold in the goldfish (Carassius auratus) as a function of signal duration
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
52
(2B
), 596
–602
.32.
Popper
,
A. N.
, and
Fay
,
R. R.
(1993
). “
Sound detection and processing by fish: Critical review and major research questions
,” Brain Behav. Evol.
41
(1
), 14
–38
.33.
Popper
,
A. N.
, and
Fay
,
R. R.
(2011
). “
Rethinking sound detection by fishes
,” Hear. Res.
273
(1
), 25
–36
.34.
Popper
,
A. N.
,
Fay
,
R. R.
,
Platt
,
C.
, and
Sand
,
O.
(2003
). “
Sound detection mechanisms and capabilities of teleost fishes
,” in Sensory Processing in Aquatic Environments
, edited by
S. P.
Collin
and
N. J.
Marshall
(
Springer
,
New York
), pp. 3
–38
.35.
Popper
,
A. N.
, and
Hastings
,
M. C.
(2009
). “
The effects of anthropogenic sources of sound on fishes
,” J. Fish Biol.
75
(3
), 455
–489
.36.
Popper
,
A. N.
, and
Hawkins
,
A. D.
(2021
). “
Fish hearing and how it is best determined
,” ICES J. Mar. Sci.
78
(7
), 2325
–2336
.37.
Popper
,
A. N.
,
Hawkins
,
A. D.
,
Sand
,
O.
, and
Sisneros
,
J. A.
(2019
). “
Examining the hearing abilities of fishes
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
146
(2
), 948
–955
.38.
Ramcharitar
,
J.
,
Higgs
,
D. M.
, and
Popper
,
A. N.
(2001
). “
Sciaenid inner ears: A study in diversity
,” Brain. Behav. Evol.
58
(3
), 152
–162
.39.
Ramcharitar
,
J. U.
,
Higgs
,
D. M.
, and
Popper
,
A. N.
(2006
).“
Audition in sciaenid fishes with different swim bladder-inner ear configurations
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
119
(1
), 439
–443
.40.
Sand
,
O.
, and
Hawkins
,
A.
(1973
). “
Acoustic properties of the cod swimbladder
,” J. Exp. Biol.
58
, 797
–820
.41.
Scholik
,
A. R.
, and
Yan
,
H. Y.
(2002
). “
Effects of boat engine noise on the auditory sensitivity of the fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas
,” Environ. Biol. Fishes
63
, 203
–209
.42.
Schulz-Mirbach
,
T.
, and
Ladich
,
F.
(2016
). “
Diversity of inner ears in fishes: Possible contribution towards hearing improvements and evolutionary considerations
,” in Fish Hearing and Bioacoustics: An Anthology in Honor of Arthur N. Popper and Richard R. Fay
, edited by
J. A.
Sisneros
(
Springer
,
Cham, Switzerland
), pp. 341
–391
.43.
Schulz-Mirbach
,
T.
,
Ladich
,
F.
,
Plath
,
M.
, and
Heß
,
M.
(2019
). “
Enigmatic ear stones: What we know about the functional role and evolution of fish otoliths: The role of fish otoliths in inner ear function
,” Biol. Rev.
94
(2
), 457
–482
.44.
Schulz-Mirbach
,
T.
,
Ladich
,
F.
,
Plath
,
M.
,
Metscher
,
B. D.
, and
Heß
,
M.
(2014
). “
Are accessory hearing structures linked to inner ear morphology? Insights from 3D orientation patterns of ciliary bundles in three cichlid species
,” Front. Zool.
11
(1
), 25
.45.
Sisneros
,
J. A.
,
Popper
,
A. N.
,
Hawkins
,
A. D.
, and
Fay
,
R. R.
(2016
). “
Auditory evoked potential audiograms compared with behavioral audiograms in aquatic animals
,” in The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life II
, edited by
A. N.
Popper
and
A.
Hawkins
(
Springer
,
New York
), Vol.
875
, pp. 1049
–1056
.46.
Slabbekoorn
,
H.
,
Bouton
,
N.
,
van Opzeeland
,
I.
,
Coers
,
A.
,
ten Cate
,
C.
, and
Popper
,
A. N.
(2010
). “
A noisy spring: The impact of globally rising underwater sound levels on fish
,” Trends Ecol. Evol.
25
(7
), 419
–427
.47.
Smith
,
M. E.
(2016
). “
Relationship between hair cell loss and hearing loss in fishes
,” in The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life II
, edited by
A. N.
Popper
and
A.
Hawkins
(
Springer
,
New York
), Vol.
875
, pp. 1067
–1074
.48.
Song
,
J.
,
Zhao
,
B.
,
Liu
,
J.
,
Cao
,
L.
, and
Dou
,
S.
(2019
). “
Comparative study of otolith and sulcus morphology for stock discrimination of yellow drum along the Chinese coast
,” J. Ocean. Limnol.
37
(4
), 1430
–1439
.49.
Taylor
,
M. D.
,
Fowler
,
A. M.
, and
Suthers
,
I. M.
(2020
). “
Insights into fish auditory structure–function relationships from morphological and behavioural ontogeny in a maturing sciaenid
,” Mar. Biol.
167
(2
), 21
–32
.50.
van der Sluijs
,
I.
,
Gray
,
S. M.
,
Amorim
,
M. C. P.
,
Barber
,
I.
,
Candolin
,
U.
,
Hendry
,
A. P.
,
Krahe
,
R.
,
Maan
,
M. E.
,
Utne-Palm
,
A. C.
,
Wagner
,
H.-J.
, and
Wong
,
B. B. M.
(2011
). “
Communication in troubled waters: Responses of fish communication systems to changing environments
,” Evol. Ecol.
25
, 623
–640
.51.
Whitfield
,
A. K.
, and
Becker
,
A.
(2014
). “
Impacts of recreational motorboats on fishes: A review
,” Mar. Pollut. Bull.
83
(1
), 24
–31
.52.
Wright
,
K. J.
,
Higgs
,
D. M.
,
Belanger
,
A. J.
, and
Leis
,
J. M.
(2005
). “
Auditory and olfactory abilities of pre-settlement larvae and post-settlement juveniles of a coral reef damselfish (Pisces: Pomacentridae)
,” Mar. Biol.
147
(6
), 1425
–1434
.53.
Wysocki
,
L. E.
, and
Ladich
,
F.
(2005
). “
Hearing in fishes under noise conditions
,” J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.
6
, 28
–36
.54.
Yost
,
W. A.
, and
Schlauch
,
R. S.
(2001
). “
Fundamentals of Hearing: An Introduction (4th edition)
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
110
(4
), 1713
–1714
.© 2023 Acoustical Society of America.
2023
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.
