Users of cochlear implants (CIs) struggle in situations that require selective hearing to focus on a target source while ignoring other sources. One major reason for that is the limited access to timing cues such as temporal pitch or interaural time differences (ITDs). Various approaches to improve timing-cue sensitivity while maintaining speech understanding have been proposed, among them inserting extra pulses with short inter-pulse intervals (SIPIs) into amplitude-modulated (AM) high-rate pulse trains. Indeed, SIPI rates matching the naturally occurring AM rates improve pitch discrimination. For ITD, however, low SIPI rates are required, potentially mismatching the naturally occurring AM rates and thus creating unknown pitch effects. In this study, we investigated the perceptual contribution of AM and SIPI rate to pitch discrimination in five CI listeners and with two AM depths (0.1 and 0.5). Our results show that the SIPI-rate cue generally dominated the percept for both consistent and inconsistent cues. When tested with inconsistent cues, also the AM rate contributed, however, at the large AM depth only. These findings have implications when aiming at jointly improving temporal-pitch and ITD sensitivity in a future mixed-rate stimulation approach.

1.
Arora
,
K.
,
Dawson
,
P.
,
Dowell
,
R.
, and
Vandali
,
A.
(
2009
). “
Electrical stimulation rate effects on speech perception in cochlear implants
,”
Int. J. Audiology
48
,
561
567
.
2.
Baumann
,
U.
, and
Nobbe
,
A.
(
2004
). “
Pitch ranking with deeply inserted electrode arrays
,”
Ear Hear.
25
,
275
283
.
3.
Bland
,
J. M.
, and
Altman
,
D. G.
(
1994
). “
Statistics notes: Correlation, regression, and repeated data
,”
BMJ
308
(
6933
),
896
896
.
4.
Bland
,
J. M.
, and
Altman
,
D. G.
(
1995
). “
Statistics notes: Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 1—Correlation within subjects
,”
BMJ
310
(
6977
),
446
446
.
5.
Bregman
,
A. S.
(
1990
).
Auditory Scene Analysis
(
MIT Press
,
Cambridge, MA
).
6.
Canty
,
A.
, and
Ripley
,
B. R.
(
2022
). “
boot: Bootstrap Functions
,” https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=boot (Last viewed January 16, 2023).
7.
Carlyon
,
R. P.
(
1997
). “
The effects of two temporal cues on pitch judgments
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
102
(
2
),
1097
1105
.
8.
Carlyon
,
R. P.
,
Deeks
,
J. M.
, and
McKay
,
C. M.
(
2010
). “
The upper limit of temporal pitch for cochlear-implant listeners: Stimulus duration, conditioner pulses, and the number of electrodes stimulated
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
127
(
3
),
1469
1478
.
9.
Chatterjee
,
M.
, and
Oberzut
,
C.
(
2011
). “
Detection and rate discrimination of amplitude modulation in electrical hearing
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
130
(
3
),
1567
1580
.
10.
Churchill
,
T. H.
,
Kan
,
A.
,
Goupell
,
M. J.
, and
Litovsky
,
R. Y.
(
2014
). “
Spatial hearing benefits demonstrated with presentation of acoustic temporal fine structure cues in bilateral cochlear implant listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
136
(
3
),
1246
1256
.
11.
Cohen
,
J.
(
1992
). “
A power primer
,”
Psychol. Bull.
112
(
1
),
155
159
.
12.
Cousineau
,
D.
(
2005
). “
Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method
,”
Quant. Methods Psychol.
1
(
1
),
42
45
.
13.
Croghan
,
N. B. H.
,
Duran
,
S. I.
, and
Smith
,
Z. M.
(
2017
). “
Re-examining the relationship between number of cochlear implant channels and maximal speech intelligibility
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
142
(
6
),
EL537
EL543
.
14.
Darwin
,
C. J.
(
1997
). “
Auditory grouping
,”
Trends Cogn. Sci.
1
(
9
),
327
333
.
15.
de Balthasar
,
C.
,
Boëx
,
C.
,
Cosendai
,
G.
,
Valentini
,
G.
,
Sigrist
,
A.
, and
Pelizzone
,
M.
(
2003
). “
Channel interactions with high-rate biphasic electrical stimulation in cochlear implant subjects
,”
Hear. Res.
182
(
1-2
),
77
87
.
16.
Friesen
,
L. M.
,
Shannon
,
R. V.
,
Baskent
,
D.
, and
Wang
,
X.
(
2001
). “
Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
110
(
2
),
1150
1163
.
17.
Gaudrain
,
E.
, and
Başkent
,
D.
(
2018
). “
Discrimination of voice pitch and vocal-tract length in cochlear implant users
,”
Ear Hear.
39
(
2
),
226
237
.
18.
Geurts
,
L.
, and
Wouters
,
J.
(
2001
). “
Coding of the fundamental frequency in continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
(
2
),
713
726
.
19.
Goldsworthy
,
R. L.
,
Bissmeyer
,
S. R. S.
, and
Camarena
,
A.
(
2022
). “
Advantages of pulse rate compared to modulation frequency for temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users
,”
J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.
23
(
1
),
137
150
.
20.
Graves
,
J. E.
, and
Oxenham
,
A. J.
(
2019
). “
Pitch discrimination with mixtures of three concurrent harmonic complexes
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
145
(
4
),
2072
2083
.
21.
Hancock
,
K. E.
,
Chung
,
Y.
, and
Delgutte
,
B.
(
2012
). “
Neural ITD coding with bilateral cochlear implants: Effect of binaurally coherent jitter
,”
J. Neurophysiol.
108
(
3
),
714
728
.
22.
Hochmair
,
I.
,
Nopp
,
P.
,
Jolly
,
C.
,
Schmidt
,
M.
,
Ser
,
H. S.
,
Garnham
,
C.
, and
Anderson
,
I.
(
2006
). “
MED-EL cochlear implants: State of the art and a glimpse into the future
,”
Trends Amplif.
10
(
4
),
201
219
.
23.
Hossain
,
S.
, and
Goldsworthy
,
R. L.
(
2018
). “
Factors affecting speech reception in background noise with a vocoder implementation of the FAST algorithm
,”
J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.
19
(
4
),
467
478
.
24.
Ihlefeld
,
A.
,
Carlyon
,
R. P.
,
Kan
,
A.
,
Churchill
,
T. H.
, and
Litovsky
,
R. Y.
(
2015
). “
Limitations on monaural and binaural temporal processing in bilateral cochlear implant listeners
,”
J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.
16
(
5
),
641
652
.
25.
Klein
,
S. A.
(
2001
). “
Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: A commentary
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
63
(
8
),
1421
1455
.
26.
Kong
,
Y.-Y.
, and
Carlyon
,
R. P.
(
2010
). “
Temporal pitch perception at high rates in cochlear implants
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
127
(
5
),
3114
3123
.
27.
Kong
,
Y.-Y.
,
Deeks
,
J. M.
,
Axon
,
P. R.
, and
Carlyon
,
R. P.
(
2009
). “
Limits of temporal pitch in cochlear implants
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
125
(
3
),
1649
1657
.
28.
Kreft
,
H. A.
,
Oxenham
,
A. J.
, and
Nelson
,
D. A.
(
2010
). “
Modulation rate discrimination using half-wave rectified and sinusoidally amplitude modulated stimuli in cochlear-implant users
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
127
(
2
),
656
659
.
29.
Krumbholz
,
K.
,
Patterson
,
R. D.
, and
Pressnitzer
,
D.
(
2000
). “
The lower limit of pitch as determined by rate discrimination
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
108
(
3
),
1170
1180
.
30.
Laback
,
B.
,
Egger
,
K.
, and
Majdak
,
P.
(
2015
). “
Perception and coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants
,”
Hear. Res.
322
,
138
150
.
31.
Laback
,
B.
,
Majdak
,
P.
, and
Baumgartner
,
W.-D.
(
2007
). “
Lateralization discrimination of interaural time delays in four-pulse sequences in electric and acoustic hearing
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
121
(
4
),
2182
2191
.
32.
Laback
,
B.
,
Pok
,
S.-M.
,
Baumgartner
,
W.-D.
,
Deutsch
,
W. A.
, and
Schmid
,
K.
(
2004
). “
Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors
,”
Ear Hear.
25
(
5
),
488
500
.
33.
Laneau
,
J.
,
Wouters
,
J.
, and
Moonen
,
M.
(
2006
). “
Improved music perception with explicit pitch coding in cochlear implants
,”
Audiol. Neurotol.
11
(
1
),
38
52
.
34.
Lindenbeck
,
M. J.
,
Laback
,
B.
,
Majdak
,
P.
, and
Srinivasan
,
S.
(
2020
). “
Temporal-pitch sensitivity in electric hearing with amplitude modulation and inserted pulses with short inter-pulse intervals
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
147
(
2
),
777
793
.
35.
Loizou
,
P. C.
,
Poroy
,
O.
, and
Dorman
,
M.
(
2000
). “
The effect of parametric variations of cochlear implant processors on speech understanding
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
108
(
2
),
790
802
.
36.
Macherey
,
O.
, and
Carlyon
,
R. P.
(
2010
). “
Temporal pitch percepts elicited by dual-channel stimulation of a cochlear implant
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
127
(
1
),
339
349
.
37.
Majdak
,
P.
,
Laback
,
B.
, and
Baumgartner
,
W.-D.
(
2006
). “
Effects of interaural time differences in fine structure and envelope on lateral discrimination in electric hearing
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
120
(
4
),
2190
2201
.
38.
McKay
,
C. M.
, and
Carlyon
,
R. P.
(
1999
). “
Dual temporal pitch percepts from acoustic and electric amplitude-modulated pulse trains
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
(
1
),
347
357
.
39.
McKay
,
C. M.
, and
McDermott
,
H. J.
(
1996
). “
The perception of temporal patterns for electrical stimulation presented at one or two intracochlear sites
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
100
(
2
),
1081
1092
.
40.
McKay
,
C. M.
,
McDermott
,
H. J.
, and
Clark
,
G. M.
(
1994
). “
Pitch percepts associated with amplitude-modulated current pulse trains in cochlear implantees
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
96
(
5
),
2664
2673
.
41.
McKay
,
C. M.
,
McDermott
,
H. J.
, and
Clark
,
G. M.
(
1995
). “
Pitch matching of amplitude-modulated current pulse trains by cochlear implantees: The effect of modulation depth
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
97
(
3
),
1777
1785
.
42.
McKay
,
C. M.
,
Remine
,
M. D.
, and
McDermott
,
H. J.
(
2001
). “
Loudness summation for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea: Effects of rate, electrode separation, level, and mode of stimulation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
110
(
3
),
1514
1524
.
43.
Monaghan
,
J. J. M.
, and
Seeber
,
B. U.
(
2016
). “
A method to enhance the use of interaural time differences for cochlear implants in reverberant environments
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
140
(
2
),
1116
1129
.
44.
Moore
,
B. C. J.
, and
Gockel
,
H. E.
(
2012
). “
Properties of auditory stream formation
,”
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B
367
(
1591
),
919
931
.
45.
Morey
,
R. D.
(
2008
). “
Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005)
,”
Quant. Methods Psychol.
4
(
2
),
61
64
.
46.
Ohtani
,
K.
(
2000
). “
Bootstrapping R2 and adjusted R2 in regression analysis
,”
Economic Modell.
17
(
4
),
473
483
.
47.
Peterson
,
G. E.
, and
Barney
,
H. L.
(
1952
). “
Control methods used in a study of the vowels
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
24
(
2
),
175
184
.
48.
Pressnitzer
,
D.
,
Patterson
,
R. D.
, and
Krumbholz
,
K.
(
2001
). “
The lower limit of melodic pitch
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
(
5
),
2074
2084
.
49.
R Core Team
(
2022
).
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
(
R Foundation for Statistical Computing
,
Vienna, Austria
), https://www.R-project.org/ (Last viewed July 4, 2022).
50.
Riss
,
D.
,
Hamzavi
,
J.-S.
,
Blineder
,
M.
,
Honeder
,
C.
,
Ehrenreich
,
I.
,
Kaider
,
A.
,
Baumgartner
,
W.-D.
,
Gstoettner
,
W.
, and
Arnoldner
,
C.
(
2014
). “
FS4, FS4-p, and FSP: A 4-month crossover study of 3 fine structure sound-coding strategies
,”
Ear Hear.
35
(
6
),
e272
e281
.
51.
Shinn-Cunningham
,
B. G.
, and
Best
,
V.
(
2008
). “
Selective attention in normal and impaired hearing
,”
Trends Amplif.
12
(
4
),
283
299
.
52.
Smith
,
Z. M.
,
Kan
,
A.
,
Jones
,
H. G.
,
Buhr-Lawler
,
M.
,
Godar
,
S. P.
, and
Litovsky
,
R. Y.
(
2014
). “
Hearing better with interaural time differences and bilateral cochlear implants
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
135
(
4
),
2190
2191
.
53.
Sourceforge
(
2023
). https://sourceforge.net/projects/expsuite/ (Last viewed August 22, 2017).
54.
Srinivasan
,
S.
,
Laback
,
B.
, and
Majdak
,
P.
(
2017
). “
Improving interaural time difference sensitivity using short interpulse intervals with vowel-like stimuli in bilateral cochlear implants
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
141
,
3973
3974
.
55.
Srinivasan
,
S.
,
Laback
,
B.
,
Majdak
,
P.
, and
Arnoldner
,
C.
(
2020
). “
Improving interaural time difference sensitivity using short inter-pulse intervals with amplitude-modulated pulse trains in bilateral cochlear implants
,”
J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.
21
,
105
120
.
56.
Srinivasan
,
S.
,
Laback
,
B.
,
Majdak
,
P.
, and
Delgutte
,
B.
(
2018
). “
Introducing short interpulse intervals in high-rate pulse trains enhances binaural timing sensitivity in electric hearing
,”
J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.
19
(
3
),
301
315
.
57.
Stahl
,
P.
,
Macherey
,
O.
,
Meunier
,
S.
, and
Roman
,
S.
(
2016
). “
Rate discrimination at low pulse rates in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners: Influence of intracochlear stimulation site
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
139
(
4
),
1578
1591
.
58.
Thakkar
,
T.
,
Kan
,
A.
,
Jones
,
H. G.
, and
Litovsky
,
R. Y.
(
2018
). “
Mixed stimulation rates to improve sensitivity of interaural timing differences in bilateral cochlear implant listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
143
(
3
),
1428
1440
.
59.
Townshend
,
B.
,
Cotter
,
N.
,
Van Compernolle
,
D.
, and
White
,
R. L.
(
1987
). “
Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
82
(
1
),
106
115
.
60.
Vandali
,
A.
,
Sly
,
D.
,
Cowan
,
R.
, and
van Hoesel
,
R.
(
2013
). “
Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees
,”
Hear. Res.
302
,
32
49
.
61.
Vandali
,
A. E.
,
Sucher
,
C.
,
Tsang
,
D. J.
,
McKay
,
C. M.
,
Chew
,
J. W. D.
, and
McDermott
,
H. J.
(
2005
). “
Pitch ranking ability of cochlear implant recipients: A comparison of sound-processing strategies
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
117
(
5
),
3126
3138
.
62.
van Hoesel
,
R. J. M.
, and
Tyler
,
R. S.
(
2003
). “
Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
113
(
3
),
1617
1630
.
63.
Williges
,
B.
,
Jürgens
,
T.
,
Hu
,
H.
, and
Dietz
,
M.
(
2018
). “
Coherent coding of enhanced interaural cues improves sound localization in noise with bilateral cochlear implants
,”
Trends Hear.
22
,
233121651878174
.
64.
Wilson
,
B. S.
,
Finley
,
C. C.
,
Lawson
,
D. T.
,
Wolford
,
R. D.
,
Eddington
,
D. K.
, and
Rabinowitz
,
W. M.
(
1991
). “
Better speech recognition with cochlear implants
,”
Nature
352
(
6332
),
236
238
.

Supplementary Material

You do not currently have access to this content.