This study examined the intelligibility benefit of native and non-native clear speech for native and non-native listeners when the first language background of non-native talkers and listeners is matched. All four combinations of talkers and listeners were tested: native talker–native listener, non-native talker–native listener, native talker–non-native listener, and non-native talker–non-native listener. Listeners were presented with structurally simple but semantically anomalous English sentences produced clearly or casually and mixed with speech-shaped noise at 0 dB signal-to-noise ratio and asked to write down what they heard. Results showed that native English speech was more intelligible than non-native speech and that native English listeners recovered speech better than non-native listeners did. Clear speech was significantly more intelligible than casual speech. There were no interactions between speaking style and native language background indicating that clear speech intelligibility benefit was not significantly different across distinct combinations of talkers and listeners. In particular, shared first language background among non-native speakers and listeners did not provide an extra benefit in either the overall speech intelligibility or the intelligibility gains of clear speech.
References
1.
Bates
, D.
, Mächler
, M.
, Bolker
, B.
, and Walker
, S.
(2015
). “Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4
,” J. Stat. Softw.
67
(1
), 1
–48
.2.
Bent
, T.
, and Bradlow
, A. R.
(2003
). “The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
114
(3
), 1600
–1610
.3.
Boersma
, P.
, and Weenink
, P.
(2005
). “PRAAT: Doing phonetics by computer (version 3. 2. 4) [computer program]
,” http://www.Praat.org/ (Last viewed July 14, 2021).4.
Bradlow
, A. R.
, and Alexander
, J.
(2007
). “Semantic-contextual and acoustic-phonetic enhancements for English sentence-in-noise recognition by native and non-native listeners
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
121
(4
), 2339
–2349
.5.
Bradlow
, A. R.
, and Bent
, T.
(2002
). “The clear speech effect for nonnative listeners
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
112
(1
), 272
–284
.6.
Cho
, T.
, Lee
, Y.
, and Kim
, S.
(2011
). “Communicatively driven versus prosodically driven hyperarticulation in Korean
,” J. Phon.
39
(3
), 344
–361
.7.
Ferguson
, S. H.
, and Kewley-Port
, D.
(2002
). “Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
112
(1
), 259
–271
.8.
Ferguson
, S. H.
, and Kewley-Port
, D.
(2007
). “Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: Acoustic characteristics of vowels
,” J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res.
50
, 1241
–1255
.9.
Gagné
, J.-P.
, Masterson
, V. M.
, Munhall
, K. G.
, Bilida
, N.
, and Querengesser
, C.
(1994
). “Across talker variability in auditory, visual, and audiovisual speech intelligibility for conversational and clear speech
,” J. Acad. Rehab. Audiol.
27
, 135
–158
.10.
Gagné
, J.-P.
, Rochette
, A.-J.
, and Charest
, M.
(2002
). “Auditory, visual, and audiovisual clear speech
,” Speech Commun.
37
, 213
–230
.11.
Han
, H.
(2019
). “The effects of fundamental frequency contours on the intelligibility benefit of clear speech in native speakers of American English and native Speakers of Seoul Korean
,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota
, Minneapolis, MN
.12.
Hayes-Harb
, R.
, Smith
, B. L.
, Bent
, T.
, and Bradlow
, A. R.
(2008
). “The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit for native speakers of Mandarin: Production and perception of English word-final voicing contrasts
,” J. Phon.
36
(4
), 664
–679
.13.
Kang
, K. H.
, and Guion
, S. G.
(2008
). “Clear speech production of Korean stops: Changing phonetic targets and enhancement strategies
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
124
(6
), 3909
–3917
.14.
Lee
, H.
, and Kong
, E. J.
(2021
). “The effect of linguistic exposure to the standard dialect in the perception of Korean stops
,” Stud. Pho. Phon. Morph.
27
(2
), 275
–291
.15.
Lenth
, R.
, Singmann
, H.
, Love
, J.
, Buerkner
, P.
, and Herve
, M.
(2018
). “emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means
,” R package version 1(1), 3, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans (Last viewed April 26, 2022).16.
Leung
, K. K.
, Jongman
, A.
, Wang
, Y.
, and Sereno
, J. A.
(2016
). “Acoustic characteristics of clearly spoken English tense and lax vowels
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
140
(1
), 45
–58
.17.
Liu
, S.
, Del Rio
, E.
, Bradlow
, A. R.
, and Zeng
, F. G.
(2004
). “Clear speech perception in acoustic and electric hearing
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
116
(4
), 2374
–2383
.18.
McLaughlin
, D. J.
, Baese-Berk
, M. M.
, Bent
, T.
, Borrie
, S. A.
, and Van Engen
, K. J.
(2018
). “Coping with adversity: Individual differences in the perception of noisy and accented speech
,” Atten. Percept. Psychophys.
80
(6
), 1559
–1570
.19.
Munro
, M. J.
, Derwing
, T. M.
, and Morton
, S. L.
(2006
). “The mutual intelligibility of L2 speech
,” Stud. Sec. Lang. Acq.
28
(1
), 111
–131
.20.
Nye
, P. W.
, and Gaitenby
, J. H.
(1974
). “The intelligibility of synthetic monosyllabic words in short, syntactically normal sentences
,” Status Report on Speech Research SR-37/38
(Haskins Laboratory
, New Haven, CT
).21.
Picheny
, M. A.
, Durlach
, N. I.
, and Braida
, L. D.
(1985
). “Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech
,” J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res.
28
(1
), 96
–103
.22.
Picheny
, M. A.
, Durlach
, N. I.
, and Braida
, L. D.
(1986
). “Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech
,” J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res.
29
(4
), 434
–446
.23.
Rogers
, C. L.
, DeMasi
, T. M.
, and Krause
, J. C.
(2010
). “Conversational and clear speech intelligibility of /bV/ syllables produced by native and non-native English speakers
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
128
(1
), 410
–423
.29.
Smiljanic
, R.
(2021
). “Clear speech perception: Linguistic and cognitive benefits
,” in The Handbook of Speech Perception
, edited by J. S.
Pardo
, L. C.
Nygaard
, R. E.
Remez
, and D. B.
Pisoni
(Wiley-Blackwell
, Hoboken, NJ
).24.
Smiljanic
, R.
, and Bradlow
, A. R.
(2005
). “Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
118
(3
), 1677
–1688
.25.
Smiljanic
, R.
, and Bradlow
, A. R.
(2008
). “Stability of temporal contrasts across speaking styles in English and Croatian
,” J. Phon.
36
(1
), 91
–113
.26.
Smiljanic
, R.
, and Bradlow
, A. R.
(2009a
). “Native and non-native clear speech production
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am
125
(4
), 2753
.27.
Smiljanic
, R.
, and Bradlow
, A. R.
(2009b
). “Speaking and hearing clearly: Talker and listener factors in speaking style changes
,” Lang. Ling. Compass
3
(1
), 236
–264
.28.
Smiljanic
, R.
, and Bradlow
, A. R.
(2011
). “Bidirectional clear speech perception benefit for native and high-proficiency non-native talkers and listeners: Intelligibility and accentedness
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am
130
(6
), 4020
–4031
.30.
Stibbard
, R. M.
, and Lee
, J. I.
(2006
). “Evidence against the mismatched interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit hypothesis
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
120
(1
), 433
–442
.31.
Studebaker
, G.
(1985
). “A ‘rationalized’ arcsine transform
,” J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res.
28
, 455
–462
.© 2023 Acoustical Society of America.
2023
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.