This study investigated the field attenuation characteristics of hearing protection devices (HPDs), differences in estimating the protection provided by HPDs with different rating methods, and suggested potential solutions on proper use of attenuation ratings to estimate the protection provided by HPDs. The binaural octave-band personal attenuation values obtained from 1583 field users with 3985 fits on seven HPDs were used to compute the field-rating values as described in the International Organization for Standardization standard ISO 4869-2:2018, and the octave-band noise reduction (OB NR) values of each fit for 100 noises. The estimated protection for 100 noises was compared within different rating methods. The OB NR values varied with quality of fit, noise spectra, and HPD. The quality of fit was a crucial factor. Deviations in estimating the protection given by different rating methods varied with HPD and quality of fit. The misuse of subtracting the single number rating (SNR) from A-weighted noise level magnified these deviations. The multiple-number rating gave a more accurate estimation of protection provided by the earmuff compared to SNR. Improving the quality of fit and including C-weighted noise level can reduce the variability and deviation in protection estimation for different noises.

Topics
Acoustical properties, Auditory system, Acoustic attenuation, Acoustic noise control, Acoustic noise measurement, Acoustic signal processing, Measuring instruments, Electronic noise, Computer software, Descriptive statistics
1.
ISO 4869-1:1990
, “Acoustics–Hearing protectors–Part 1: Subjective method for the measurement of sound attenuation” (
International Organization for Standardization
,
Geneva, Switzerland
,
1990
).
2.
ISO 4869-2:1994
, “Acoustics–Hearing protectors–Part 2: Estimation of effective A-weighted sound pressure levels when hearing protectors are worn” (
International Organization for Standardization
,
Geneva, Switzerland
,
1994
).
3.
EN 458:2016
, “Hearing protectors–Recommendations for selection, use, care and maintenance. Guidance document” (
European Standard
,
Brussels, Belgium
,
2016
).
4.
ISO 4869-1:2018
, “Acoustics–Hearing protectors–Part 1: Subjective method for the measurement of sound attenuation” (
International Organization for Standardization
,
Geneva, Switzerland
,
2018
).
5.
ISO 4869-2:2018
, “Acoustics–Hearing protectors–Part 2: Estimation of effective A-weighted sound pressure levels when hearing protectors are worn” (
International Organization for Standardization
,
Geneva, Switzerland
,
2018
).
6.
E. H.
 
Berger
, “
Hearing protection devices
,” in
Noise Manual
, 5th ed., edited by
E. H.
 
Berger
,
L. H.
 
Royster
,
J. D.
 
Royster
,
D. P.
 
Driscoll
, and
M.
 
Layne
 (
American Industrial Hygiene Association
,
Fairfax, VA
,
2000
), pp.
379
–
454
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
7.
R.
 
Waugh
, “
Simplified hearing protector ratings—An international comparison
,”
J. Sound Vib.
 
93
(
2
),
289
–
305
(
1984
).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(84)90313-4
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
8.
GB/T 23466-2009
:
Guideline for Selection of Hearing Protectors
(
Chinese National Standard
,
Beijing, China
,
2009
) (in Chinese).
9.
D.
 
Gauger
 and
E. H.
 
Berger
, “
A new hearing protector rating: The noise reduction statistic for use with A weighting (NRSA)
,” Report for US Environmental Protection Agency (
ANSI
,
Indianapolis, IN
,
2004
).
Google Scholar
 
10.
40 CFR 211
, “Product noise labeling” (
Federal Regulation of United States, Environment Protection Agency
,
Washington, DC
,
1979
).
11.
29 CFR 1910.95
, “Occupational noise exposure; Hearing conservation amendment; Final rule” (
Federal Regulation of United States, Occupational Safety and Health Administration
,
Washington, DC
,
1983
).
12.
CSA Z94.2: 2014
, “Hearing protection devices–Performance, selection, care and use” (
Canadian National Standard
,
Ottawa, Canada
,
2014
).
13.
ANSI S12.68-2007 (R2017)
, “Methods of estimating effective A-weighted sound pressure levels when hearing protectors are worn” (
American National Standards Institute
,
New York
,
2017
).
14.
H. B.
 
Karplus
 and
G. L.
 
Bonvallet
, “
A noise survey of manufacturing industries
,”
Am. Ind. Hygiene Assoc. Quart.
 
14
(
4
),
235
–
263
(
1953
).
https://doi.org/10.1080/00968205309343944
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
15.
Y.
 
Liu
 and
M.
 
Yang
, “
Evaluating the effect of training along with fit testing on earmuff users in a Chinese textile factory
,”
J. Occup. Environ. Hygiene
 
15
(
6
),
518
–
526
(
2018
).
https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2018.1456662
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
16.
W.
 
Gong
,
X.
 
Liu
,
Y.
 
Liu
, and
L.
 
Li
, “
Evaluating the effect of training along with fit testing on foam earplug users in four factories in China
,”
Int. J. Audiol.
 
58
(
5
),
269
–
277
(
2019
).
https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2018.1563307
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
17.
Y.
 
Liu
,
W.
 
Gong
,
X.
 
Liu
, and
L.
 
Li
, “
Evaluating the effect of training along with fit testing on premolded earplug users in a Chinese petrochemical plant
,”
Ear Hear.
 
41
(
4
),
838
–
846
(
2020
).
https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000803
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
18.
E. H.
 
Berger
,
J.
 
Voix
,
R.
 
Kieper
, and
C.
 
Cocq
, “
Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation
,”
Noise Health
 
13
,
163
–
175
(
2011
).
https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.77214
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
19.
ANSI S12.71-2018
, “Performance criteria for systems that estimate the attenuation of passive hearing protectors for individuals” (
American National Standards Institute
,
New York
,
2018
).
20.
GBZ 2.2-2007
, “Occupational exposure limits for hazardous agents in the workplace, Part 2: Physical agents” (
Chinese Standard
,
Beijing, China
,
2007
). (in Chinese).
21.
W. C.
 
Thomas
 and
J. G.
 
Casali
, “
Instructional requirements for using the HML and NRR methods for estimating protected exposure levels under hearing protectors
,”
Virginia Tech Report No. 3/1/95-1-HP; ISE Report No. 9502
(
Auditory Systems Laboratory
,
Blacksburg, VA
,
1995
).
Google Scholar
 
© 2022 Acoustical Society of America.
2022
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.