The International Standards Organization (ISO) published Technical Specification (TS) 15666 in 2003 to facilitate the comparison of results from surveys on noise annoyance. This document recommends including two standardized questions with two standardized response scales in all surveys of long-term noise annoyance. A recently revised version of the TS proposes a weighting procedure for the response data to achieve a better similarity between the results from the two questions. This paper analyses the results from 43 surveys conducted according to the ISO/TS 15666 recommendations. It is shown that the average difference in the response to the two annoyance questions is equivalent to a 6 dB shift in the exposure level. The proposed weighting of the verbal response whereby response category 5 (extremely) is counted in full, and category 4 (very) is weighted by a factor 0.4 creates a greater similarity between the two responses. It is important to use a definition of prevalence of high annoyance which matches the one used for the development of the relevant noise regulations.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
April 28 2022
Effect of alternate definitions of “high” annoyance on exposure-response functions
Truls Gjestland
;
Truls Gjestland
a)
1
SINTEF Digital
, P.O. Box 4760 Torgarden, N-7465 Trondheim, Norway
a)Electronic mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Makoto Morinaga
Makoto Morinaga
2
Kanagawa University
, 3-27-1 Rokkakubashi, Kanagawa-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 221-8686, Japan
Search for other works by this author on:
a)Electronic mail: [email protected]
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 151, 2856–2862 (2022)
Article history
Received:
November 17 2021
Accepted:
April 11 2022
Citation
Truls Gjestland, Makoto Morinaga; Effect of alternate definitions of “high” annoyance on exposure-response functions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 May 2022; 151 (5): 2856–2862. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0010354
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Day-to-day loudness assessments of indoor soundscapes: Exploring the impact of loudness indicators, person, and situation
Siegbert Versümer, Jochen Steffens, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
Related Content
Assessing community noise annoyance: A review of two decades of the international technical specification ISO/TS 15666:2003
J Acoust Soc Am (November 2021)
An examination of dose uncertainty and dose distribution effects on community noise attitudinal survey outcomes
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (September 2021)