The just noticeable differences (JNDs) of room acoustic parameters are important for the design of concert halls and, in general, research of room acoustics. Precise knowledge of JNDs helps the concert hall designer in assessing the impact that changes in the geometry or materials of the hall will have on its perceived acoustics. When designing a concert hall, creating an appropriate feeling of reverberance for the audience is of prime importance. The early decay time (EDT) parameter has proved to be a better predictor of the perception of reverberance than the classical reverberation time (T30), but no studies have been conducted to specifically determine the EDT JND. In the present study, the EDT JND was investigated for broadband conditions and assessed for individual frequency ranges. A subjective study was conducted with 26 subjects with musical training, in which 21 were considered reliable. The participants listened to orchestral music convolved with measured spatial room impulse responses from three concert halls. The stimuli were auralized in an anechoic chamber using third-order Ambisonic reproduction. The obtained values show that the JNDs for the broadband conditions are lower than those for the individual frequency ranges. The EDT JND for the broadband conditions was found to be approximately 18% of the EDT value.
References
1.
2.
B. S.
Atal
, M. R.
Schroeder
, and G. M.
Sessler
, “Subjective reverberation time and its relation to sound decay
,” in 5th International Congress on Acoustics
, Liege, Belgium (1965
).3.
V. L.
Jordan
, “Acoustical criteria for auditoriums and their relation to model techniques
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
47
(2
), 408
–412
(1970
).4.
P.
Lehmann
and H.
Wilkens
, “Subjective parameters important for judging room acoustics
,” Acustica
45
, 256
–268
(1980
).5.
M.
Barron
, “Interpretation of early decay times in concert auditoria
,” Acustica
81
(4
), 320
–331
(1995
).6.
A. C.
Gade
, “Acoustic properties of concert halls in the US and in Europe: Effects of differences in size and geometry
,” in Proceedings of the Wallace Clement Sabine Centennial Symposium
, Cambridge, MA (1994
).7.
G. A.
Soulodre
and J. S.
Bradley
, “Subjective evaluation of new acoustic measures
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
98
(1
), 294
–301
(1995
).8.
M.
Morimoto
and A.
Asaoka
, “Multi-dimensional analysis of reverberance
,” in Proceedings of the 18th International Congress on Acoustics
, Kyoto, Japan (2004
).9.
R.
Talaske
, “Concert hall acoustics—2008: Leo Beranek identifies EDT as metric best correlated with subjective preference
,” Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics, Hamburg, Germany
38
(3
), 283
–293
(2018
).10.
11.
J. S.
Bradley
, “Review of objective room acoustics measures and future needs
,” Appl. Acoust.
72
, 713
–720
(2011
).12.
H. P.
Seraphim
, “Untersuchungen Uber Die Unterschiedsschwelle Exponentiellen Abklingens Von Rauschbandimpulsen” (“Investigations into the difference threshold of exponential decay of noise band pulses”)
, Acustica
8
, 280
–284
(1958
).13.
ISO 3382:2009
, “Acoustics—Measurements of room acoustics parameters—Part 1: Performance spaces
”
(International Organization for Standardization
, Geneva, Switzerland
, 2009
).14.
G.
Plenge
, “Über die Hörbarkeit von Änderungen im Frequenzgang der Nachhallzeit” (“On the audibility of changes in the frequency response of the reverberation time
”)
, Acustica
16
(5
), 269
–278
(1965
).15.
M.
Karjalainen
and H.
Järveläinen
, “More about this reverberation science: Perceptually good late reverberation
,” in Proceedings of the 111th Audio Engineering Society Convention, New York, NY
, Paper No. 5415 (2001
).16.
T. I.
Niaounakis
and W. J.
Davies
, “Perception of reverberation time in small listening rooms
,” J. Audio Eng. Soc
50
(5
), 343
–350
(2002
).17.
Z.
Meng
, F.
Zhao
, and M.
He
, “The just noticeable difference of noise length and reverberation perception
,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies, Beijing, China
(2006
), pp. 418
–421
.18.
I.
Frissen
, B. F.
Katz
, and C.
Guastavino
, “Effect of sound stimuli on the perception of reverberation in large volumes
,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Auditory Display, Copenhagen, Denmark
(2009
), Vol. 5954
, pp. 358
–376
.19.
M. G.
Blevins
, A. T.
Buck
, Z.
Peng
, and L. M.
Wang
, “Quantifying the just noticeable difference of reverberation time with band-limited noise centered around 1000 Hz using a transformed up-down adaptive method
,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Room Acoustics
, Toronto, Canada (2013
).20.
M. T.
Neal
, “A spherical microphone and compact loudspeaker array measurement database for the study of concert hall preference
,” Ph.D. thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, 2019
.21.
T.
Kuroda
and E.
Hasuo
, “The very first step to start psychophysical experiments
,” Acoust. Sci. Tech.
35
(1
), 1
–9
(2014
).22.
M.
García-Pérez
and R.
Alcalá-Quintana
, “Reminder and 2AFC tasks provide similar estimates of the difference limen: A reanalysis of data from Lapid, Ulrich, and Rammsayer (2008) and a discussion of Ulrich and Vorberg (2009)
,” Atten. Percept. Psychophys.
3
(74
), 489
–492
(2012
).23.
E.
Lapid
, R.
Ulrich
, and T.
Rammsayer
, “On estimating the difference limen in duration discrimination tasks: A comparison of the 2AFC and the reminder task
,” Percept. Psychophys.
70
, 291
–305
(2008
).24.
M. T.
Neal
and M. C.
Vigeant
, “The CHORDatabase: A twenty-one concert hall spherical microphone and loudspeaker array measurement database
,” in Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress on Acoustics
, Aachen, Germany (2019
), pp. 7863
-7870
.25.
A.
Torras Rosell
, “Methods of measuring impulse responses in architectural acoustics,” M.Sc
. thesis, Technical University of Denmark (DTU)
, 2009
.26.
J. S.
Bradley
and G. A.
Soulodre
, “The influence of late arriving energy on spatial impression
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
97
(4
), 2263
–2271
(1995
).27.
E.
Kahle
and J. P.
Jullien
, “Some new considerations on the subjective impression of reverberance and its correlation with objective criteria
,” in Proceedings of the Wallace Clement Sabine Centennial Symposium
, Cambridge, MA (1994
), pp. 239
–242
.28.
M. R.
Schroeder
, “New method of measuring reverberation time
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
37
(3
), 409
–412
(1965
).29.
D.
Griesinger
, “Quantifying musical acoustics through audibility
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
94
(3
), 1891
(1993
).30.
M.
Gerzon
, “Periphony: With-height sound reproduction
,” J. Audio Eng. Soc.
21
(1
), 2
–10
(1973
).31.
D. A.
Dick
and M. C.
Vigeant
, “An investigation of listener envelopment utilizing a spherical microphone array and third-order ambisonics reproduction
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
145
(4
), 2795
–2809
(2019
).32.
33.
F. A.
Wichmann
and N. J.
Hill
, “The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit
,” Percep. Psychophys.
63
(8
), 1293
–1313
(2001
).34.
L. L.
Beranek
, Concert Halls and Opera Houses
, 2nd ed. (Springer
, New York
, 2004
).35.
M.
Barron
, Auditorium Acoustics and Architectural Design
, 2nd ed. (Spon
, Abingdon
, 2009
).36.
Denon
, Anechoic Orchestral Music Recordings
(sound recording) (Nippon Columbia Co., Ltd.
, Tokyo, Japan
, 1988
).37.
M. T.
Neal
, “Investigating the sense of listener Envelopment in concert halls using third-order ambisonic reproduction over a loudspeaker array and a hybrid room acoustics simulation method
,” The Pennsylvania State University
, M.S. thesis, 2015
.38.
C.
Micheyl
, K.
Delhommeau
, X.
Perrot
, and A. J.
Oxenham
, “Influence of musical and psychoacoustical training on pitch discrimination
,” Hear. Res.
219
(1
), 36
–47
(2006
).39.
A. J.
Oxenham
, B. J.
Fligor
, C. R.
Mason
, and G.
Kidd
, “Informational masking and musical training
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
114
(3
), 1543
–1549
(2003
).40.
S.
Bech
, “Selection and training of subjects for listening tests on sound-reproducing equipment
,” J. Audio Eng. Soc.
40
(7-8
), 590
–610
(1992
).41.
N.
Zacharov
and G.
Lorho
, “What are the requirements of a listening panel for evaluating spatial audio quality?
,” in Proceedings of the Spatial Audio and Sensory Evaluation Techniques Workshop
, University of Surrey, UK (2006
).42.
R. E.
Kirk
, “Learning, a major factor influencing preferences for high fidelity reproducing systems
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
28
(6
), 1113
–1116
(1956
).43.
F.
Toole
, “Subjective measurements of loudspeaker sound
,” J. Audio. Eng. Soc.
33
(1/2
), 2
–32
(1985
).44.
45.
H. H.
Schütt
, S.
Harmeling
, J. H.
Macke
, and F. A.
Wichmann
, “Painfree and accurate Bayesian estimation of psychometric functions for (potentially) overdispersed data
,” Vision Res.
122
, 105
–123
(2016
).46.
B.
Treutwein
and H.
Strasburger
, “Fitting the psychometric function
,” Percept. Psychophys.
61
, 87
–106
(1999
).47.
B.
Treutwein
, “Adaptive psychophysical procedures
,” Vision Res.
35
, 2503
–2522
(1995
).48.
D. W.
Hosmer
and S.
Lemeshow
, Applied Logistic Regression
, 3rd ed. (Wiley
, Hoboken, NJ
, 2013
).49.
L.
Fahrmeir
, T.
Kneib
, S.
Lang
, and B.
Marx
, Regression
(Springer
, Berlin
, 2013
).50.
MATLAB (version R2020b) [computer program] (
The MathWorks, Inc.
, Natick, MA
, 2020
).51.
D. M.
Ennis
, “The power of sensory discrimination methods
,” J. Sens. Stud.
8
, 353
–370
(1993
).52.
J.
Cohen
, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
, 2nd ed. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
, Hillsdale, NJ
, 1988
).53.
D.
Lee
, D.
Cabrera
, and W. L.
Martens
, “The effect of loudness on the reverberance of music: Reverberance prediction using loudness models
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
131
, 1194
–1205
(2012
).54.
B. C.
Moore
, An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing
, 6th ed. (Brill
, Boston
, 2013
).55.
A.
Billon
and J. J.
Embrechts
, “Discrimination thresholds of the reverberation in large volumes by naive listeners
,” in Proceedings of the Acoustics 2012 Nantes Conference
, Nantes
, France
, pp. 300
–403
.56.
M. C.
Vigeant
, R. D.
Celmer
, C. M.
Jasinski
, M. J.
Ahearn
, M. J.
Schaeffler
, C. B.
Giacomoni
, A. P.
Wells
, and C. I.
Ormsbee
, “The effects of different test methods on the just noticeable difference of clarity index for music
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
138
(1
), 476
–491
(2015
).57.
T. J.
Cox
, W. J.
Davies
, and Y. W.
Lam
, “The sensitivity of listeners to early sound field changes in auditoria
,” Acustica
79
(1
), 27
–41
(1993
).© 2022 Acoustical Society of America.
2022
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.