Some models of speech production propose that speech variation reflects an adaptive trade-off between the needs of the listener and constraints on the speaker. The current study considers communicative load as both a situational and lexical variable that influences phonetic variation in speech to real interlocutors. The current study investigates whether the presence or absence of a target word in the sight of a real listener influences speakers' patterns of variation during a communicative task. To test how lexical difficulty also modulates intelligibility, target words varied in phonological neighborhood density (ND), a measure of lexical difficulty. Acoustic analyses reveal that speakers produced longer vowels in words that were not visually present for the listener to see, compared to when the listener could see those words. This suggests that speakers assess in real time the presence or absence of supportive visual information in assessing listener comprehension difficulty. Furthermore, the presence or absence of the word interacted with ND to predict both vowel duration and hyperarticulation patterns. These findings indicate that lexical measures of a word’s difficulty and speakers’ online assessment of lexical intelligibility (based on a word’s visual presence or not) interactively influence phonetic modifications during communication with a real listener.

1.
Baese-Berk
,
M.
, and
Goldrick
,
M.
(
2009
). “
Mechanisms of interaction in speech production
,”
Lang. Cogn. Proc.
24
(
4
),
527
554
.
2.
Baker
,
R. E.
, and
Bradlow
,
A. R.
(
2009
). “
Variability in word duration as a function of probability, speech style, and prosody
,”
Lang. Speech
54
(
4
),
391
413
.
3.
Bard
,
E. G.
,
Anderson
,
A. H.
,
Sotillo
,
C.
,
Aylett
,
M.
,
Doherty-Sneddon
,
G.
, and
Newlands
,
A.
(
2000
). “
Controlling the intelligibility of referring expressions in dialogue
,”
J. Mem. Lang.
42
(
1
),
1
22
.
4.
Barreda
,
S.
, and
Nearey
,
T. M.
(
2018
). “
A regression approach to vowel normalization for missing and unbalanced data
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
144
(
1
),
500
520
.
5.
Bates
,
D.
,
Mächler
,
M.
,
Bolker
,
B.
, and
Walker
,
S.
(
2015
). “
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
,”
J. Stat. Softw.
67
(1),
1
48
.
6.
Beddor
,
P.
(
2009
). “
A coarticulatory path to sound change
,”
Language
85
(
4
),
785
821
.
7.
Beddor
,
P. S.
,
McGowan
,
K. B.
,
Boland
,
J. E.
,
Coetzee
,
A. W.
, and
Brasher
,
A.
(
2013
). “
The time course of perception of coarticulation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
133
(
4
),
2350
2366
.
8.
Bradlow
,
A. R.
,
Torretta
,
G. M.
, and
Pisoni
,
D. B.
(
1996
). “
Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics
,”
Speech Commun.
20
(
3–4
),
255
272
.
9.
Bradlow
,
A. R.
(
2002
). “
Confluent talker- and listener-oriented forces in clear speech production
,”
Lab. Phonol.
7
,
237
274
.
10.
Bradlow
,
A. R.
,
Kraus
,
N.
, and
Hayes
,
E.
(
2003
). “
Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
46
(
1
),
80
97
.
11.
Bradlow
,
A. R.
, and
Bent
,
T.
(
2002
). “
The clear speech effect for non-native listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
112
(
1
),
272
284
.
12.
Buz
,
E.
,
Tanenhaus
,
M. K.
, and
Jaeger
,
T. F.
(
2016
). “
Dynamically adapted context-specific hyper-articulation: Feedback from interlocutors affects speakers' subsequent pronunciations
,”
J. Mem. Lang.
89
,
68
86
.
13.
Ferguson
,
S. H.
, and
Kewley-Port
,
D.
(
2007
). “
Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: Acoustic characteristics of vowels
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
50
,
1241
1255
.
14.
Fowler
,
C.
, and
Housum
,
J.
(
1987
). “
Talkers' signaling of ‘new' and ‘old' words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction
,”
J. Mem. Lang.
26
,
489
504
.
15.
Fowler
,
C. A.
,
Levy
,
E. T.
, and
Brown
,
J. M.
(
1997
). “
Reductions of spoken words in certain discourse contexts
,”
J. Mem. Lang.
37
,
24
40
.
16.
Fox
,
N. P.
,
Reilly
,
M.
, and
Blumstein
,
S. E.
(
2015
). “
Phonological neighborhood competition affects spoken word production irrespective of sentential context
,”
J. Mem. Lang.
83
,
97
117
.
17.
Gorman
,
K.
,
Howell
,
J.
, and
Wagner
,
M.
(
2011
). “
Prosodylab-aligner: A tool for forced alignment of laboratory speech
,”
Can. Acoust.
39
(
3
),
192
193
.
18.
Johnson
,
K.
,
Flemming
,
E.
, and
Wright
,
R.
(
1993
). “
The hyperspace effect: Phonetic targets are hyperarticulated
,”
Language
69
(
3
),
505
528
.
19.
Kuznetsova
,
A.
,
Brockhoff
,
P. B.
, and
Christensen
,
R. H. B.
(
2017
). “
lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models
,”
J. Stat. Softw.
82
(
13
),
1
26
.
20.
Lane
,
H.
, and
Tranel
,
B.
(
1971
). “
The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
14
(
4
),
677
709
.
21.
Lee
,
D. Y.
, and
Baese-Berk
,
M. M.
(
2020
). “
The maintenance of clear speech in naturalistic conversations
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
147
(
5
),
3702
3711
.
22.
Lindblom
,
B.
(
1990
). “
Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory
,” in
Speech production and speech modelling
, edited by
W. J
Hardcastle
, and
A.
Marchal
(
Springer
,
Dordrecht
), pp.
403
439
.
23.
Lombard
,
E.
(
1911
). “
Le signe de l'elevation de la voix” (“The sign of the elevation of the voice”)
,”
Ann. Malad. Oreille Larynx
37
,
101
119
.
25.
Moon
,
S. J.
, and
Lindblom
,
B.
(
1994
). “
Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
96
(
1
),
40
55
.
26.
Munson
,
B.
, and
Solomon
,
N. P.
(
2004
). “
The effect of phonological neighborhood density on vowel articulation
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
47
(
5
),
1048
1058
.
27.
Nelson
,
N. R.
, and
Wedel
,
A.
(
2017
). “
The phonetic specificity of competition: Contrastive hyperarticulation of voice onset time in conversational English
,”
J. Phon.
64
,
51
70
.
28.
Picheny
,
M. A.
,
Durlach
,
N. I.
, and
Braida
,
L. D.
(
1985
). “
Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
28
(
1
),
96
103
.
29.
Picheny
,
M. A.
,
Durlach
,
N. I.
, and
Braida
,
L. D.
(
1986
). “
Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
29
(
4
),
434
446
.
30.
Reddy
,
S.
, and
Stanford
,
J. N.
(
2015
). “
Toward completely automated vowel extraction: Introducing DARLA
,”
Ling. Vanguard
1
(
1
),
15
28
.
31.
Rosenfelder
,
I.
,
Fruehwald
,
J.
,
Evanini
,
K.
,
Seyfarth
,
S.
,
Gorman
,
K.
,
Prichard
,
H.
, and
Yuan
,
J.
(
2014
). “
FAVE (forced alignment and vowel extraction)
,” program suite v1.2.2.
32.
Scarborough
,
R.
,
Brenier
,
J.
,
Zhao
,
Y.
,
Hall-Lew
,
L.
, and
Dmitrieva
,
O.
(
2007
). “
An acoustic study of real and imagined foreigner-directed speech
,” in
Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVI)
, August 6-10, Saarbrücken, Germany.
33.
Scarborough
,
R. A.
(
2010
). “
Lexical and contextual predictability: Confluent effects on the production of vowels
,” in
Laboratory Phonology
, edited by
C.
Fougeron
,
B.
Kuhnert
,
M.
D'Imperio
, and
N.
Vallee
(
De Gruyter Mouton
,
Berlin
), pp.
557
586
.
34.
Scarborough
,
R.
(
2013
). “
Neighborhood-conditioned patterns in phonetic detail: Relating coarticulation and hyperarticulation
,”
J. Phon.
41
(
6
),
491
508
.
35.
Scarborough
,
R.
, and
Zellou
,
G.
(
2013
). “
Clarity in communication: ‘Clear' speech authenticity and lexical neighborhood density effects in speech production and perception
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
134
(
5
),
3793
3807
.
36.
Seyfarth
,
S.
,
Buz
,
E.
, and
Jaeger
,
T. F.
(
2016
). “
Dynamic hyperarticulation of coda voicing contrasts
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
139
(
2
),
EL31
EL37
.
37.
Smiljanić
,
R.
, and
Bradlow
,
A. R.
(
2008
). “
Stability of temporal contrasts across speaking styles in English and Croatian
,”
J. Phon.
36
(
1
),
91
113
.
38.
Smiljanić
,
R.
, and
Bradlow
,
A. R.
(
2009
). “
Speaking and hearing clearly: Talker and listener factors in speaking style changes
,”
Lang. Ling. Compass
3
,
236
264
.
39.
Vajrabhaya
,
P.
, and
Kapatsinski
,
V.
(
2011
). “
There is more to the story: First-mention lengthening in Thai Interactive discourse
,” in
Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVII)
, August 17-21, Hong Kong (pp.
2050
2053
).
40.
Wedel
,
A.
,
Nelson
,
N.
, and
Sharp
,
R.
(
2018
). “
The phonetic specificity of contrastive hyperarticulation in natural speech
,”
J. Mem. Lang.
100
,
61
88
.
41.
Wright
,
R.
(
2004
). “
Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation
,” in
Papers in laboratory phonology VI
, edited by
J.
Local
,
R.
Ogden
, and
R.
Temple
(
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge
), pp.
26
50
.
42.
Zellou
,
G.
, and
Scarborough
,
R.
(
2015
). “
Lexically conditioned phonetic variation in motherese: Age-of-acquisition and other word-specific factors in infant-and adult-directed speech
,”
Lab. Phon.
6
(
3–4
),
305
336
.
43.
Zellou
,
G.
, and
Scarborough
,
R.
(
2019
). “
Neighborhood-conditioned phonetic enhancement of an allophonic vowel split
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
145
(
6
),
3675
3685
.
You do not currently have access to this content.