In this study we investigated the effect of sex- and age-related differences in vocal fold length, thickness, and depth on voice production in a three-dimensional vocal fold model. The results showed that the cause-effect relationships between vocal fold physiology and voice production previously identified in an adult male-like vocal fold geometry remained qualitatively the same in vocal folds with geometry representative of adult females and children. We further showed that the often-observed differences in voice production between adult males, adult females, and children can be explained by differences in length and thickness. The lower F0, higher flow rate, larger vocal fold vibration amplitude, and higher sound pressure level (SPL) in adult males as compared to adult females and children can be explained by differences in vocal fold length. In contrast, the thickness effect dominated and contributed to the larger closed quotient of vocal fold vibration, larger normalized maximum flow declination rate, and lower H1-H2 in adult males as compared to adult females and children. The effect of differences in vocal fold depth was generally small. When targeting a specific SPL, adult males experienced a lower peak vocal fold contact pressure during phonation than adult females and children.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 2021
December 28 2021
Contribution of laryngeal size to differences between male and female voice production
Zhaoyan Zhang
Zhaoyan Zhang
a)
Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles
, 31-24 Rehabilitation Center, 1000 Veteran Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90095-1794, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
a)
Electronic mail: zyzhang@ucla.edu, ORCID: 0000-0002-2379-6086.
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 150, 4511–4521 (2021)
Article history
Received:
August 17 2021
Accepted:
November 24 2021
Citation
Zhaoyan Zhang; Contribution of laryngeal size to differences between male and female voice production. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 December 2021; 150 (6): 4511–4521. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0009033
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionPay-Per-View Access
$40.00