Parametric arrays have been widely investigated due to their high directivity in the low-frequency region when measuring the acoustic characteristics of materials, such as sound transmission and reflection properties, in the limited space of acoustic water tanks. Because a parametric array utilizes nonlinear interaction across the frequency components, nonlinear phenomena arise in both the acoustic medium and the hydrophone system. The unwanted nonlinear sound generated in the hydrophone and instrumentation is termed pseudo-sound. This study devised an experiment to measure the pseudo-sound without a truncator to assess the effect of the pseudo-sound in the near field. In order to separately measure the pseudo-sound, the hydrophone was placed close to the projector so that the pseudo-sound was dominantly generated. The method is based on the fact that, if we can suppress a parametric signal by minimizing the propagation path length in the medium, the resulting measured signal can be attributed to the pseudo-sound. The resultant signal levels were matched to the levels at corresponding distances based on the primary levels of a (separately conducted) distance-varying experiment. Finally, the suitability of the proposed technique was evaluated by comparing its results with the pseudo-sound levels measured using a truncator.

1.
P. J.
Westervelt
, “
Parametric acoustic array
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
35
,
535
537
(
1963
).
2.
J.
Lee
,
C. H.
Lee
,
S. W.
Lee
,
J.
Shin
, and
J. W.
Jung
, “
Analysis of highly directional sonar communication system
,”
J. Inst. Electron. Eng. Korea
49
,
3
9
(
2012
).
3.
Y.
Hwang
,
Y.
Je
, and
W.
Moon
, “
Design and development research of a parametric array transducer for high directional underwater communication
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Korea
34
,
117
129
(
2015
).
4.
C. H.
Lee
,
J.
Lee
, and
J.
Bae
, “
Sub-bottom profiling algorithm using parametric array
,”
J. Ocean Eng. Technol.
28
,
55
63
(
2014
).
5.
V. F.
Humphrey
and
H. O.
Berktay
, “
The transmission coefficient of a panel measured with a parametric source
,”
J. Sound Vib.
101
,
85
106
(
1985
).
6.
V. F.
Humphrey
, “
The measurement of acoustic properties of limited size panels by use of a parametric source
,”
J. Sound Vib.
98
,
67
81
(
1985
).
7.
V. F.
Humphrey
, “
The influence of the plane wave spectrum of a source on measurements of the transmission coefficient of a panel
,”
J. Sound Vib.
108
,
261
272
(
1986
).
8.
V. F.
Humphrey
,
S. P.
Robinson
,
J. D.
Smith
,
M. J.
Martin
,
G. A.
Beamiss
,
G.
Hayman
, and
N. L.
Carroll
, “
Acoustic characterization of panel materials under simulated ocean conditions using a parametric array source
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
124
,
803
814
(
2008
).
9.
J. P.
Szabo
and
A. D.
Bent
, “
Reduction in edge effects for small panels characterized by a parametric array source
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
145
,
795
804
(
2019
).
10.
D.
Jung
, “
Experimental investigation of parametric array for low frequency measurement system of acoustic materials
,” Ph.D. dissertation,
Korea Maritime and Ocean University
,
Busan, Korea
,
2021
.
11.
J. L. S.
Bellin
and
R. T.
Beyer
, “
Experimental investigation of an end-fire array
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
34
,
1051
1054
(
1962
).
12.
H. O.
Berktay
, “
Possible exploitation of non-linear acoustics in underwater transmitting applications
,”
J. Sound Vib.
2
,
435
461
(
1965
).
13.
M. B.
Bennett
and
D. T.
Blackstock
, “
Parametric array in air
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
57
,
562
568
(
1975
).
14.
M. B.
Moffett
and
R. H.
Mellen
, “
Model for parametric acoustic sources
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
61
,
325
337
(
1977
).
15.
M. B.
Moffett
and
P.
Mello
, “
Parametric acoustic sources of transient signals
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
66
,
1182
1187
(
1979
).
16.
M. B.
Moffett
and
R. H.
Mellen
, “
Effective lengths of parametric acoustic sources
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
70
,
1424
1426
(
1981
).
17.
D.
Jung
,
J.
Song
,
J.
Kim
, and
J.
Lee
, “
Comparative experimental investigation on optimal parametric array types
,”
Sensors
21
,
5085
(
2021
).
18.
V. F.
Humphrey
and
C. H.
Hsu
, “
Nonlinearity of cylindrical hydrophones used for the measurement of parametric arrays
,” in
Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics
,
University of Birmingham
(December 16–17
1980
), Vol.
40
, pp.
S35
S35
, see https://www.ioa.org.uk/catalogue/article/non-linearity-cylindrical-hydrophones-used-measurement-parametric-arrays.
19.
V. F.
Humphrey
, “
Applications of parametric acoustic arrays in laboratory scale experiments
,” in
Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics
(
1988
), Vol.
10
, pp.
37
55
, see https://www.ioa.org.uk/catalogue/article/applications-parametric-acoustic-arrays-laboratory-scale-experiments.
20.
M. B.
Moffett
and
T. A.
Henriquez
, “
Hydrophone nonlinearity measurements
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
72
,
1
6
(
1982
).
21.
Y.
Hwang
,
Y.
Je
,
W.
Kim
,
H.
Seo
, and
W.
Moon
, “
Acoustic filter design for precise measurement of parametric array in near-field region
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
132
,
2068
(
2012
).
22.
J.
Song
, “
Measurement experiment of low-frequency characteristic using parametric array in acoustic tank
,” Master's thesis,
Korea Maritime and Ocean University
,
Busan, Korea
,
2020
.
23.
M. B.
Moffett
and
J. E.
Blue
, “
Hydrophone nonlinearity measurements
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
68
,
S35
(
1980
).
24.
W. H.
Kim
, “
A consideration on the results of sound field measurement for the parametric array
,” in
Proceedings of Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering
,
Adelaide, Australia
(April,
2012
), pp.
202
203
.
25.
T. G.
Muir
and
J. E.
Blue
, “
Experiments on the acoustic modulation of large-amplitude waves
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
46
,
227
232
(
1969
).
26.
W. L.
Konrad
, “
Design and performance of parametric sonar systems
,”
Report No. TR 5227
,
Naval Underwater Systems Center
(
1975
).
You do not currently have access to this content.