In fisheries acoustics, the target strength (TS; dB re m2) is used to compute biological metrics such as fish biomass and density. The TS is challenging to characterize because of its stochastic relationship with fish physiology, orientation, depth, species assemblage, and size distributions. These challenges were addressed by using acoustic and physical samples of fish from trawls in the Penobscot River Estuary, Maine. The pelagic species assemblage was dominated by clupeids and osmerids. The TS was measured from individual fish using single target detection and echo tracking algorithms. An expectation–maximization algorithm was applied to identify the components of the TS and total length (TL; cm) distributions for the mixed species assemblages. Regressions were used to estimate the parameters of TS = α log10(TL) + β. The parameters, α = 31.2 [standard error (SE) 0.87] and β = –79.6 (SE 0.93), were similar to published studies from these species, but our slope and intercept were higher than those in studies from freshwater and lower than those from marine systems. These results suggest that acoustic surveys in estuaries with mixed species assemblages should carefully consider alternatives to “standard” TS-fish length equations. These results will provide necessary parameters to allow for interpretation of acoustic survey data from systems with a similar composition of pelagic species.

1.
Able
,
K. W.
(
2005
). “
A re-examination of fish estuarine dependence: Evidence for connectivity between estuarine and ocean habitats
,”
Estuarine, Coastal Shelf Sci.
64
,
5
17
.
2.
Andersen
,
L. N.
(
2001
). “
The new Simrad EK60 scientific echosounder system
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
,
2336
2336
.
3.
Benaglia
,
T.
,
Chauveau
,
D.
,
Hunter
,
D.
, and
Young
,
D.
(
2009
). “
mixtools: An R package for analyzing finite mixture models
,”
J. Stat. Software
32
(
6
),
1
29
.
4.
Bertsekas
,
D.
(
1990
). “
The auction algorithm for assignment and other network flow problems: A tutorial
,”
Interfaces
20
(
4
),
133
149
.
5.
Blaber
,
S. J. M.
, and
Blaber
,
T. G.
(
1980
). “
Factors affecting the distribution of juvenile estuarine and inshore fish
,”
J. Fish Biol.
17
(
2
),
143
162
.
6.
Blackman
,
S. S.
(
1986
).
Multiple-Target Tracking with Radar Applications
(
Artech House Inc
.,
Norwood, MA
), 449 pp.
7.
Boswell
,
K. M.
,
Kaller
,
M. D.
,
Cowan
,
J. H.
, and
Wilson
,
C. A.
(
2008
). “
Evaluation of target strength–fish length equation choices for estimating estuarine fish biomass
,”
Hydrobiologia
610
(
1
),
113
123
.
8.
Boswell
,
K. M.
, and
Wilson
,
C. A.
(
2008
). “
Side-aspect target strength measurements of bay anchovy (Anchoa mitchilli) and Gulf menhaden (Brevoortia patronus) derived from ex situ experiments
,”
ICES J. Mar. Sci.
65
,
1012
1020
.
9.
Boswell
,
K. M.
,
Wilson
,
M. P.
,
MacRae
,
P. S.
,
Wilson
,
C. A.
, and
Cowan
,
J. H.
, Jr.
(
2010
). “
Seasonal estimates of fish biomass and length distributions using acoustics and traditional nets to identify estuarine habitat preferences in Barataria Bay, Louisiana
,”
Mar. Coastal Fish.
2
(
1
),
83
97
.
10.
Boswell
,
K. M.
,
Wilson
,
M. P.
, and
Wilson
,
C. A.
(
2007
). “
Hydroacoustics as a tool for assessing fish biomass and size distribution associated with discrete shallow water estuarine habitats in Louisiana
,”
Estuaries Coasts
30
(
4
),
607
617
.
11.
Brooking
,
T. E.
, and
Rudstam
,
L. G.
(
2009
). “
Hydroacoustic target strength distributions of alewives in a net-cage compared with field surveys: Deciphering target strength distributions and effect on density estimates
,”
Trans. Am. Fish. Soc.
138
(
3
),
471
486
.
12.
Clay
,
C. S.
, and
Heist
,
B. G.
(
1984
). “
Acoustic scattering by fish—Acoustic models and a two‐parameter fit
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
75
(
4
),
1077
1083
.
13.
Collette
,
B. B.
, and
Klein-MacPhee
,
G.
(
2002
).
Bigelow and Schroeder's Fishes of the Gulf of Maine
, 3rd ed. (
Smithsonian Institution
,
Washington, D.C
.).
14.
Dawson
,
J. J.
, and
Karp
,
W. A.
(
1990
). “
In situ measures of target-strength variability of individual fish
,” ICES (International Council for the Exploration of the Sea) Cooperative Research Report, Vol.
189
, pp.
264
273
.
15.
Dawson
,
J. J.
,
Wiggins
,
D.
,
Degan
,
D.
,
Geiger
,
H.
,
Hart
,
D.
, and
Adams
,
B.
(
2000
). “
Point-source violations: Split-beam tracking of fish at close range
,”
Aquat. Living Resour.
13
(
5
),
291
295
.
16.
Day
,
L. R.
(
2006
). “
Restoring native fisheries to Maine's largest watershed: The Penobscot River Restoration Project
,”
J. Contemp. Water Res. Educ.
134
(
1
),
29
33
.
17.
DuFour
,
M. R.
,
Mayer
,
C. M.
,
Qian
,
S. S.
,
Vandergoot
,
C. S.
,
Kraus
,
R. T.
,
Kocovsky
,
P. M.
, and
Warner
,
D. M.
(
2018
). “
Inferred fish behavior its implications for hydroacoustic surveys in nearshore habitats
,”
Fish. Res.
199
,
63
75
.
18.
Echoview Software Pty. Ltd. (2018). (Version 8.0) (computer program), https://echoview.com/support/echoview-downloads/ (Last viewed September 30, 2021).
19.
Foote
,
K. G.
(
1987
). “
Fish target strengths for use in echo integrator surveys
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
82
(
3
),
981
987
.
20.
Foote
,
K. G.
,
Knudsen
,
H. P.
,
Vestnes
,
G.
,
MacLennan
,
D. N.
, and
Simmonds
,
E. J.
(
1987
). “
Calibration of acoustic instruments for fish density estimation: A practical guide
,”
ICES Cooperative Research Report, Vol.
144
, 81
p
p.
21.
Fréon
,
P.
, and
Misund
,
O. A.
(
1999
).
Dynamics of Pelagic Fish Distribution and Behavior: Effects on Fisheries and Stock Assessment
(
Fishing News Books
,
Oxford, UK
), p.
360
.
22.
Frouzova
,
J.
,
Kubecka
,
J.
,
Balk
,
H.
, and
Frouz
,
J. J.
(
2005
). “
Target strength of some European fish species and its dependence on fish body parameters
,”
Fish. Res.
75
(1–3),
86
96
.
23.
Geyer
,
W. R.
, and
Ralston
,
D. K.
(
2018
). “
A mobile pool of contaminated sediment in the Penobscot Estuary, Maine, USA
,”
Sci. Total Environ.
612
,
694
707
.
24.
Guillard
,
J. A.
,
Albaret
,
J. J.
,
Simier
,
M.
,
Sow
,
I.
,
Raffray
,
J.
, and
Tito de Morias
,
L.
(
2004
). “
Spatio-temporal variability of fish assemblages in the Gambia estuary (West Africa) observed by two vertical hydroacoustic methods: Moored and mobile sampling
,”
Aquat. Living Resour.
17
,
47
55
.
25.
Guillard
,
J.
,
Simier
,
M.
,
Albaret
,
J. J.
,
Raffray
,
J.
,
Sow
,
I.
, and
De Morais
,
L. T.
(
2012
). “
Fish biomass estimates along estuaries: A comparison of vertical acoustic sampling at fixed stations and purse seine catches
,”
Estuarine, Coastal Shelf Sci.
107
,
105
111
.
26.
Hammond
,
T.
(
1997
). “
A Bayesian interpretation of target strength data from the Grand Banks
,”
Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.
54
(
10
),
2323
2333
.
27.
Horne
,
J. K.
(
2000
). “
Acoustic approaches to remote species identification: A review
,”
Fish. Oceanogr.
9
(
4
),
356
371
.
28.
Horne
,
J. K.
(
2003
). “
The influence of ontogeny, physiology, and behaviour on the target strength of walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma)
,”
ICES J. Mar. Sci.
60
(
5
),
1063
1074
.
29.
Huang
,
K.
, and
Clay
,
C. S.
(
1980
). “
Backscattering cross sections of live fish: PDF and aspect
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
67
(
3
),
795
802
.
30.
Jech
,
J. M.
(
2014
). “
Postprocessing of Scientific Echo-Sounder Data from the NOAA Ships Albatross IV and HB Bigelow: 1998–2012
,”
Reference Document 14-08
,
Northeast Fisheries Science Center
,
Woods Hole, MA
.
31.
Kieser
,
R.
, and
Mulligan
,
T. J.
(
1984
). “
Analysis of echo counting data: A model
,”
Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.
41
(
3
),
451
458
.
32.
Kotwicki
,
S.
,
De Robertis
,
A.
,
Ianelli
,
J. N.
,
Punt
,
A. E.
, and
Horne
,
J. K.
(
2013
). “
Combining bottom trawl and acoustic data to model acoustic dead zone correction and bottom trawl efficiency parameters for semipelagic species
,”
Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.
70
(
2
),
208
219
.
33.
Lipsky
,
C. A.
,
Saunders
,
R.
,
Stevens
,
J. R.
,
O'Malley
,
M.
, and
Music
,
P.
(
2019
). “
Developing sampling strategies to assess the Penobscot River estuary (2010–2013)
,” Department Commerce, Northeast Fisheries Science Center, Reference Document No. 19-02, 56 pp., available at (Last viewed September 23, 2021).
34.
Love
,
R. H.
(
1969
). “
Maximum side-aspect target strength of an individual fish
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
46
,
746
752
.
35.
Love
,
R. H.
(
1971
). “
Dorsal‐aspect target strength of an individual fish
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
49
(
3B
),
816
823
.
36.
MacLennan
,
D. N.
,
Fernandes
,
P. G.
, and
Dalen
,
J.
(
2002
). “
A consistent approach to definitions and symbols in fisheries acoustics
,”
ICES J. Mar. Sci.
59
(
2
),
365
369
.
37.
MacLennan
,
D. N.
, and
Menz
,
A.
(
1996
). “
Interpretation of in situ target-strength data
,”
ICES J. Mar. Sci.
53
,
233
236
.
38.
Mann
,
D. A.
,
Higgs
,
D. M.
,
Tavolga
,
W. N.
,
Souza
,
M. J.
, and
Popper
,
A. N.
(
2001
). “
Ultrasound detection by clupeiform fishes
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
(
6
),
3048
3054
.
39.
Martino
,
E. J.
, and
Able
,
K. W.
(
2003
). “
Fish assemblages across the marine to low salinity transition zone of a temperate estuary
,”
Estuarine, Coastal Shelf Sci.
56
(
5-6
),
969
987
.
40.
Meng
,
X.-L.
, and
Rubin
,
D. B.
(
1993
). “
Maximum likelihood estimation via the ECM algorithm: A general framework
,”
Biometrika
80
(
2
),
267
278
.
41.
Neter
,
J.
,
Kutner
,
M. H.
,
Nachtsheim
,
C. J.
, and
Wasserman
,
W.
(
1996
).
Applied Linear Statistical Models
, 4th ed. (
Irwin
,
Chicago
).
42.
O'Malley
,
M. B.
,
Saunders
,
R.
,
Stevens
,
J. R.
,
Jech
,
J. M.
, and
Sheehan
,
T. F.
(
2017
). “
Using hydroacoustics to describe pelagic fish distribution in the Penobscot Estuary Maine
,”
Trans. Am. Fish. Soc.
146
(
5
),
817
833
.
43.
Ona
,
E.
(
1999
). “
Methodology for target strength measurements
,”
ICES Cooperative Research Report
, Vol.
235
, p.
59
.
44.
R. Core Team (2018). “
R: A language and environment for statistical computing
,” (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna Austria).
45.
Rivoirard
,
J.
,
Simmonds
,
J.
,
Foote
,
K. G.
,
Fernandes
,
P.
, and
Bez
,
N.
(
2000
).
Geostatistics for Estimating Fish Abundance.
(
Blackwell Science Ltd
.,
Oxford, UK
), 206 pp.
46.
Røttingen
,
I.
(
1976
). “
On the relation between echo intensity and fish density
,”
FiskDir. Skr. Havunders.
16
(9),
301
314
.
47.
Rudstam
,
L. G.
,
Parker
,
S. L.
,
Einhouse
,
D. W.
,
Witzel
,
L. D.
,
Warner
,
D. M.
,
Stritzel
,
J. L.
,
Parrish
,
D. L.
, and
Sullivan
,
P. J.
(
2003
). “
Application of in situ target-strength estimations in lakes: Examples from rainbow-smelt surveys in Lakes Erie and Champlain
,”
ICES J. Mar. Sci.
60
(
3
),
500
507
.
48.
Sawada
,
K.
,
Furusawa
,
M.
, and
Williamson
,
N. J.
(
1993
). “
Conditions for the precise measurement of fish target strength in situ
,”
J. Mar. Acoust. Soc. Jpn.
20
,
73
79
.
49.
Scott
,
W. B.
, and
Crossman
,
E. J.
(
1973
). “
Freshwater fishes of Canada
,”
Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada
Vol.
184
, 966 pp.
50.
Simmonds
,
J.
, and
MacLennan
,
D. N.
(
2005
).
Fisheries Acoustics: Theory and Practice
(
Wiley
,
New York
),
438
pp.
51.
SIMRAD EK60.
(
2012
). “
Scientific Echo Sounder. Reference Manual. Release 2.4.X
,” Document No. 164692, revision D, Kongsberg Maritime AS, Horten, Norway, pp.
16
, 48–49, 191, 199, 221, available at https://www.kongsberg.com/globalassets/maritime/simrad/echo-sounders/ek60/operation/164692ad_ek60_reference_manual_english_lores.pdf (Last viewed 23 August 2021).
52.
Soule
,
M.
,
Barange
,
M.
,
Solli
,
H.
, and
Hampton
,
I.
(
1997
). “
Performance of a new phase algorithm for discriminating between single and overlapping echoes in a split-beam echosounder
,”
ICES J. Mar. Sci.
54
(
5
),
934
938
.
53.
Soule
,
M.
,
Hampton
,
I.
, and
Barange
,
M.
(
1996
). “
Potential improvements to current methods of recognizing single targets with a split-beam echo-sounder
,”
ICES J. Mar. Sci
53
(
2
),
237
243
.
54.
Warner
,
D. M.
,
Rudstam
,
L. G.
, and
Klumb
,
R. A.
(
2002
). “
In situ target strength of alewives in freshwater
,”
Trans. Am. Fish. Soc.
131
(
2
),
212
223
.
55.
Williams
,
K.
,
Punt
,
A. E.
,
Wilson
,
C. D.
, and
Horne
,
J. K.
(
2011
). “
Length-selective retention of walleye pollock, Theragra chalcogramma, by midwater trawls
,”
ICES J. Mar. Sci.
68
(
1
),
119
129
.
56.
Xie
,
Y.
(
2000
). “
A range-dependent echo-association algorithm and its application in split-beam sonar tracking of migratory salmon in the Fraser River watershed
,”
IEEE J. Ocean. Eng
25
(
3
),
387
398
.

Supplementary Material

You do not currently have access to this content.