Musicians and music professionals are often considered to be expert listeners for listening tests on room acoustics. However, these tests often target acoustic parameters other than those typically relevant in music such as pitch, rhythm, amplitude, or timbre. To assess the expertise in perceiving and understanding room acoustical phenomena, a listening test battery was constructed to measure the perceptual sensitivity and cognitive abilities in the identification of rooms with different reverberation times and different spectral envelopes. Performance in these tests was related to data from the Goldsmiths Musical Sophistication Index, self-reported previous experience in music recording and acoustics, and academic knowledge on acoustics. The data from 102 participants show that sensory and cognitive abilities are both correlated significantly with musical training, analytic listening skills, recording experience, and academic knowledge on acoustics, whereas general interest in and engagement with music do not show any significant correlations. The regression models, using only significantly correlated criteria of musicality and professional expertise, explain only small to moderate amounts (11%–28%) of the variance in the “room acoustic listening expertise” across the different tasks of the battery. Thus, the results suggest that the traditional criteria for selecting expert listeners in room acoustics are only weak predictors of their actual performances.

1.
Baker
,
F. B.
(
2001
).
The Basics of Item Response Theory
, 2nd ed. (
ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation
,
College Park, MD
).
2.
Barron
,
M.
(
1971
). “
The subjective effects of first reflections in concert halls—The need for lateral reflections
,”
J. Sound Vib.
15
(
4
),
475
494
.
3.
Barron
,
M.
(
1988
). “
Subjective study of British symphony concert halls
,”
Acta Acust. Acust.
66
(
1
),
1
14
.
4.
Bates
,
D.
,
Mälcher
,
M.
,
Bolker
,
B.
, and
Walker
,
S.
(
2015
). “
Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4
,”
J. Stat. Softw.
67
(
1
),
1
48
.
5.
Brinkmann
,
F.
,
Lindau
,
A.
,
Weinzierl
,
S.
,
Geissler
,
G.
,
van de Par
,
S.
,
Müller-Trapet
,
M.
,
Opdam
,
R.
, and
Vorländer
,
M.
(
2017a
). “
The FABIAN head-related transfer-function data base
,” available at (Last viewed September 28, 2021).
6.
Brinkmann
,
F.
,
Lindau
,
A.
,
Weinzierl
,
S.
,
van de Par
,
S.
,
Müller-Trapet
,
M.
,
Opdam
,
R.
, and
Vorländer
,
M.
(
2017b
). “
A high resolution and full-spherical head-related transfer function database for different head-above-torso orientations
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
65
(
10
),
841
848
.
7.
de Ayala
,
R. J.
(
2013
).
The Theory and Practice of Item Response Theory
(
Guilford Publications
, London).
8.
de Boeck
,
P.
,
Bakker
,
M.
,
Zwitser
,
R.
,
Nivard
,
M.
,
Hofman
,
A.
,
Tuerlinckx
,
F.
, and
Partchev
,
I.
(
2011
). “
The estimation of item response models with the lmer function from the lme4 package in R
,”
J. Stat. Softw.
39
(
12
),
1
28
.
9.
Di Liberto
,
G. M.
,
Pelofi
,
C.
,
Shamma
,
S.
, and
de Cheveigné
,
A.
(
2020
). “
Musical expertise enhances the cortical tracking of the acoustic envelope during naturalistic music listening
,”
Acoust. Sci. Technol.
41
(
1
),
361
364
.
10.
DIN 18041.
(
2004
).
Hörsamkeit in Räumen—Anforderungen, Empfehlungen Und Hinweise für die Planung (Acoustic Quality in Rooms—Specifications and Instructions for the Room Acoustic Design)
(
Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V
.,
Berlin, Germany
).
11.
Dunn
,
T. J.
,
Baguley
,
T.
, and
Brunsden
,
V.
(
2014
). “
From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation
,”
Br. J. Psychol.
105
(
3
),
399
412
.
12.
Greif
,
J.
,
Ackermann
,
D.
,
Kokabi
,
O.
, and
Weinzierl
,
S.
(
2020
). “
Kann man die Form eines Konzertsaales hören?
” (“
Can the geometrical shape of a concert hall be heard?
”), in
Fortschritte der Akustik—DAGA 2020
(Deutsche Gesellschaft für Akustik, Berlin), pp.
1153
1156
.
13.
Hambleton
,
R. K.
, and
van der Linden
,
W. J.
(
1982
). “
Advances in item response theory and applications: An introduction
,”
Appl. Psychol. Meas.
6
(
4
),
373
3378
.
14.
Hansen
,
V.
, and
Munch
,
G.
(
1991
). “
Making recordings for simulation tests in the archimedes project
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
39
(
10
),
768
774
.
15.
Harrison
,
P. M. C.
, and
Müllensiefen
,
D.
(
2018
). “
Development and validation of the Computerised Adaptive Beat Alignment Test (CA-BAT)
,”
Sci. Rep.
8
,
12395
.
16.
Howard
,
M. C.
(
2016
). “
A review of exploratory factor analysis decisions and overview of current praxis: What we ware doing and how can we improve?
,”
Int. J. Human-Comput. Interact.
32
(
1
),
51
62
.
17.
ISO
(
2009
).
3382-1,
Acoustics—Measurement of Room Acoustic Parameters—Part 1: Performance Spaces
(
International Organization for Standardization
,
Geneva, Switzerland
).
18.
ISO
(
2014
). 8586,
Sensory Analysis – General Guidelines for the Selection, Training and Monitoring of Selected Assessors and Expert Sensory Assessors
(
International Organization for Standardization
,
Geneva, Switzerland
).
19.
James
,
G.
,
Witten
,
D.
,
Hastie
,
T.
, and
Tibshirani
,
R.
(
2017
).
An Introduction to Statistical Learning with Applications in R
, 8th ed. (
Springer Science and Business Media
,
New York
).
20.
Knoblauch
,
K.
(
2014
).
Package “psyphy
, available at https://cran.csiro.au/web/packages/psyphy/psyphy.pdf (Last viewed September 28, 2021).
21.
Kreimann
,
J.
,
Gerratt
,
B. R.
, and
Precoda
,
K.
(
1990
). “
Listener experience and perception of voice quality
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
33
,
103
115
.
22.
Kuusinen
,
A.
, and
Lokki
,
T.
(
2017
). “
Wheel of concert hall acoustics
,”
Acta Acust. Acust.
103
(
2
),
185
188
.
23.
Kuusinen
,
A.
, and
Lokki
,
T.
(
2020
). “
Recognizing individual concert halls is difficult when listening to the acoustics with different musical passages
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
148
(
3
),
1380
1390
.
24.
Li
,
J.
,
Lu
,
X.
,
Cheng
,
K.
,
Liu
,
W.
, and
Li
,
M. J.
(
2020
).
Package “StepReg,”
available at http://cran.irsn.fr/web/packages/StepReg/StepReg.pdf (Last viewed September 28, 2021).
25.
LimeSurvey GmbH
(
2003
). “
Limesurvey: The online survey tool
,” available at https://www.limesurvey.org (Last viewed September 28, 2021).
26.
Lokki
,
T.
,
Pätynen
,
J.
,
Kuusinen
,
A.
, and
Tervo
,
S.
(
2012
). “
Disentangling preference ratings of concert hall acoustics using subjective sensory profiles
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
132
(
5
),
3148
3161
.
27.
Magis
,
D.
, and
Raîche
,
G.
(
2011
). “
catR: An R package for computerized adaptive testing
,”
Appl. Psychol. Meas.
35
(
7
),
576
577
.
28.
Müllensiefen
,
D.
,
Gingras
,
B.
,
Musil
,
J.
, and
Stewart
,
L.
(
2014
). “
The musicality of non-musicians: An index for assessing musical sophistication in the general population
,”
PloS One
9
(
2
),
e89642
.
29.
Murphy
,
G.
(
2004
).
The Big Book of Concepts
(
MIT Press
,
Cambridge, MA
).
30.
Nakagawa
,
S.
, and
Schielzeth
,
H.
(
2013
). “
A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models
,”
Methods Ecol. Evol.
4
(
1
),
133
142
.
31.
Olsson
,
U.
(
1979
). “
Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient
,”
Psychometrika
44
(
4
),
443
460
.
32.
Revelle
,
W.
(
2019
).
Package “psych
, available at https://personality-project.org/r/psych-manual.pdf (Last viewed September 28, 2021).
33.
Riederer
,
K. A. J.
(
1998
). “
Repeatability analysis of head-related transfer function measurements
,” in
105th AES Convention
,
San Francisco
, Paper No.
4846
.
34.
Schröder
,
D.
, and
Vorländer
,
M.
(
2011
). “
RAVEN: A real-time framework for the auralization of interactive virtual environments
,” in
Forum Acusticum
, pp.
1541
1546
.
35.
Soulodre
,
G. A.
, and
Bradley
,
J. S.
(
1995
). “
Subjective evaluation of new room acoustic measures
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
98
(
1
),
294
301
.
36.
The R Foundation
(
1993
). “
R
,” available at https://www.r-project.org/ (Last viewed September 28, 2021).
37.
Weinzierl
,
S.
,
Lepa
,
S.
, and
Ackermann
,
D.
(
2018
). “
A measuring instrument for the auditory perception of rooms: The Room Acoustical Quality Inventory (RAQI)
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
144
(
3
),
1245
1257
.
38.
Weinzierl
,
S.
, and
Vorländer
,
M.
(
2015
). “
Room acoustical parameters as predictors of room acoustical impression: What do we know and what would we like to know?
,”
Acoust. Aust.
43
(
1
),
41
48
.
39.
Wickelmaier
,
F.
, and
Choisel
,
S.
(
2005
). “
Selecting participants for listening tests of multichannel reproduced sound
,” in
118th AES Convention
,
Barcelona
, Paper No.
6483
.
40.
Wilkens
,
H.
(
1977
). “
Mehrdimensionale Beschreibung subjektiver Beurteilungen der Akustik von Konzertsälen” (“Multidimensional description of subjective evaluations of the acoustics of concert halls
”),
Acustica
38
,
10
23
.
41.
Wong
,
P. C. M.
,
Skoe
,
E.
,
Russo
,
N. M.
,
Dees
,
T.
, and
Kraus
,
N.
(
2007
). “
Musical experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns
,”
Nat. Neurosci.
10
(
4
),
420
422
.
42.
Zacharov
,
N.
, and
Lorho
,
G.
(
2006
). “
What are the requirements of a listening panel for evaluating spatial audio quality?
,” in
Proceedings of the International Workshop on Spatial Audio and Sensory Evaluation Techniques
,
Guilford, United Kingdom
.

Supplementary Material

You do not currently have access to this content.