Hearing aids are commonly fit with ear canals partially or fully open—a condition that increases the risk of acoustic feedback. Feedback limits the audiometric fitting range of devices by limiting usable gain. To guide clinical decision making and device selection, we developed the Peak Height Insertion Gain (PHIG) method to detect feedback spikes in the short-term insertion gain derived from audio recordings. Using a manikin, 145 audio recordings of a speech signal were obtained from seven hearing aids. Each hearing aid was programmed for a moderate high-frequency hearing loss with systematic variations in frequency response, gain, and feedback suppression; this created audio recordings that varied the presence and strength of feedback. Using subjective ratings from 13 expert judges, the presence of feedback was determined and then classified according to its temporal and tonal qualities. These classifications were used to optimize parameters for two versions of the PHIG method based on global and local analyses. When specificity was fixed at 0.95, the sensitivity of the global analysis was 0.86 and increased to 0.95 when combined with the local analysis. Without compromising performance, a clinically expedient version of the PHIG method can be obtained using only a single measurement.

1.
Agnew
,
J.
(
1996
). “
Acoustic feedback and other audible artifacts in hearing aids
,”
Trends Amplif.
1
(
2
),
45
82
.
2.
Alexander
,
J. M.
(
2016
). “
Hearing aid delay and current drain in modern devices
,” https://canadianaudiologist.ca/hearing-aid-delay-feature/ (Last viewed July 1, 2020).
3.
Alexander
,
J. M.
, and
Masterson
,
K.
(
2015
). “
Effects of WDRC release time and number of channels on output SNR and speech recognition
,”
Ear Hear.
36
(
2
),
e35
e49
.
4.
Audacity Team (
2018
). See https://www.audacityteam.org/ for Audacity version 2.2.2 (Last viewed August 25, 2021).
5.
Bisgaard
,
N.
, and
Ruf
,
S.
(
2017
). “
Findings from EuroTrak surveys from 2009 to 2015: Hearing loss prevalence, hearing aid adoption, and benefits of hearing aid use
,”
Am. J. Audiol.
26
(
3S
),
451
461
.
6.
Chung
,
K.
(
2004
). “
Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids: Part II. Feedback and occlusion effect reduction strategies, laser shell manufacturing processes, and other signal processing technologies
,”
Trends Amplif.
8
(
4
),
125
146
.
7.
Cox
,
R.
(
1982
). “
Combined effects of earmold vents and suboscillatory feedback on hearing aid frequency response
,”
Ear Hear.
3
(
1
),
12
17
.
8.
Green
,
D. M.
(
1958
). “
Detection of multiple component signals in noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
30
(
10
),
904
911
.
9.
Green
,
D. M.
,
McKey
,
M. J.
, and
Licklider
,
J. C. R.
(
1959
). “
Detection of a pulsed sinusoid in noise as a function of frequency
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
31
(
11
),
1446
1452
.
10.
Green
,
D. M.
, and
Swets
,
J. A.
(
1966
).
Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics
(
Krieger
,
Huntington, NY
).
11.
Harris
,
F.
(
1978
). “
On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fourier transform
,”
Proc. IEEE
66
(
1
),
51
83
.
12.
Johnson
,
E.
, and
Dillon
,
H.
(
2011
). “
A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: Impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol.
22
(
7
),
441
459
.
13.
Kaiser
,
J.
, and
Schafer
,
R.
(
1980
). “
On the use of the 10-sinh window for spectrum analysis
,”
IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process.
28
(
1
),
105
107
.
14.
MacIntosh
,
S.
, and
Cornelisse
,
L.
(
2018
). “
Understanding and managing feedback in hearing instruments
,” Unitron whitepaper 027-6249-02.
15.
Madhu
,
N.
,
Wouters
,
J.
,
Spriet
,
A.
,
Bisitz
,
T.
,
Hohmann
,
V.
, and
Moonen
,
M.
(
2011
). “
Study on the applicability of instrumental measures for black-box evaluation of static feedback control in hearing aids
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
130
(
2
),
933
947
.
16.
Marcum
,
S.
, and
Ricketts
,
T. A.
(
2011
). “
Assessment of modern feedback reduction systems
,” in
Invited Poster at the American Auditory Society Annual Meeting
,
Scottsdale
,
AZ
.
17.
Merks
,
I.
(
2010
). “
Method and apparatus for measurement of gain margins of a hearing assistance device
,” U.S. patent no. 7664281 B2.
18.
Merks
,
I.
,
Banerjee
,
S.
, and
Trine
,
T.
(
2006
). “
Assessing the effectiveness of feedback cancellers in hearing aids
,”
Hear. Rev.
13
(
4
),
53
57
.
19.
Ricketts
,
T.
,
Johnson
,
E.
, and
Federman
,
J.
(
2008
). “
Individual differences within and across feedback suppression hearing aids
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol.
19
(
10
),
748
757
.
20.
Scollie
,
S.
,
Seewald
,
R.
,
Cornelisse
,
L.
,
Moodie
,
S.
,
Bagatto
,
M.
,
Laurnagaray
,
D.
,
Beaulac
,
S.
, and
Pumford
,
J.
(
2005
). “
The desired sensation level multistate input/output algorithm
,”
Trends Amplif.
9(
4
),
159
197
.
21.
Shin
,
M.
,
Wang
,
S.
,
Bentler
,
R. A.
, and
He
,
S.
(
2007
). “
New feedback detection method for performance evaluation of hearing aids
,”
J. Sound Vib.
302
,
350
360
.
22.
So
,
H. C.
,
Chan
,
Y. T.
,
Ma
,
Q.
, and
Ching
,
P. C.
(
1999
). “
Comparison of various periodograms for sinusoid detection and frequency estimation
,”
IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst.
35
(
3
),
945
952
.
23.
Spriet
,
A.
,
Eneman
,
K.
,
Moonen
,
M.
, and
Wouters
,
J.
(
2008
). “
Objective measures for real-time evaluation of adaptive feedback cancellation algorithms in hearing aids
,” in
Proceedings of the European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO)
,
Lausanne, Switzerland
.
24.
Spriet
,
A.
,
Moonen
,
M.
, and
Wouters
,
J.
(
2009
). “
Objective evaluation of feedback reduction techniques in hearing aids
,” in
Proceedings of the European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO)
,
Glasgow, UK
.
25.
Spriet
,
A.
,
Moonen
,
M.
, and
Wouters
,
J.
(
2010
). “
Evaluation of feedback reduction techniques in hearing aids based on physical performance measures
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
128
(
3
),
1245
1261
.
26.
Swets
,
J. A.
,
Shipley
,
E. F.
,
McKey
,
M. J.
, and
Green
,
D. M.
(
1959
). “
Multiple observations of signals in noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. America
31
(
4
),
514
521
.
27.
Taylor
,
B. N.
, and
Kuyatt
,
C. E.
(
1994
). “
Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of nist measurement results
,” NIST Technical Note 1297—1994 edition (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington DC, 1994). https://www.nist.gov/document-18373 (Last viewed July 1, 2020).
You do not currently have access to this content.