The modified rhyme test [MRT; House, Williams, Hecker, and Kryter. (1965). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 37, 158–166] is a widely used test for measuring the intelligibility of communication systems [ANSI (2009). S3.2 (American National Standards Institute, New York)] but has never gained widespread acceptance as a clinical test of speech intelligibility for listeners who are hearing impaired (HI). In this study, a clinical version of the MRT consisting of two 80-word lists was developed and tested on 2394 service members with varying levels of hearing loss. The test used a factorial design incorporating two speech levels [70 and 78 dB sound pressure level (SPL)], two signal-to-noise ratios (+4 and −4 dB), and two binaural conditions (diotic and binaural). High-frequency emphasis reduced the impact of audibility for HI listeners, focusing the test on the distortion component of hearing loss. The results show that listeners with normal hearing (NH) obtained an average score of 80% correct on the MRT80 test. Listeners with a moderate hearing impairment scored an average of 70% correct. The overall level had little impact on performance for either NH or HI listeners. The results demonstrate that the MRT80 test could be a useful test to assess the distortion effects of hearing loss on speech intelligibility, particularly in cases where it is desirable to use a closed-set test for automatic administration.

1.
Akeroyd
,
M. A.
(
2008
). “
Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults
,”
Int. J. Audiol.
47
(
sup2
),
S53
S71
.
2.
Amlani
,
A. M.
,
Punch
,
J. L.
, and
Ching
,
T. Y.
(
2002
). “
Methods and applications of the audibility index in hearing aid selection and fitting
,”
Trends Amplif.
6
(
3
),
81
129
.
3.
ANSI
(
1997
). S3.5 (R2012),
Methods for the Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index
(
American National Standards Institute
,
New York
).
4.
ANSI
(
2009
). S3.2 (R2014),
Method for Measuring the Intelligibility of Speech over Communication Systems
(
American National Standards Institute
,
New York
).
5.
Berg
,
R. L.
,
Pickett
,
W.
,
Linneman
,
J. G.
,
Wood
,
D. J.
, and
Marlenga
,
B.
(
2014
). “
Asymmetry in noise-induced hearing loss: Evaluation of two competing theories
,”
Noise Health
16
(
69
),
102
107
.
6.
Blue-Terry
,
M.
,
McBride
,
M.
, and
Letowski
,
T.
(
2013
). “
Effects of speech intensity on the callsign acquisition test (CAT) and modified rhyme test (MRT) presented in noise
,”
Arch. Acoust.
37
(
2
),
199
203
.
7.
Brungart
,
D. S.
,
Barrett
,
M. E.
,
Cohen
,
J. I.
,
Fodor
,
C.
,
Yancey
,
C.
, and
Gordon-Salant
,
S.
(
2020
). “
Objective assessment of speech intelligibility in crowded public spaces
,”
Ear Hear.
41
(
1
),
68S
78S
.
8.
Brungart
,
D. S.
,
Walden
,
B.
,
Cord
,
M.
,
Phatak
,
S.
,
Theodoroff
,
S. M.
,
Griest
,
S.
, and
Grant
,
K. W.
(
2017
). “
Development and validation of the Speech Reception in Noise (SPRINT) Test
,”
Hear. Res.
349
,
90
97
.
9.
Carhart
,
R.
,
Tillman
,
T. W.
, and
Greetis
,
E. S.
(
1969
). “
Release from multiple maskers: Effects of interaural time disparities
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
45
(
2
),
411
418
.
10.
Colburn
,
H. S.
, and
Durlach
,
N. I.
(
1978
). “
Models of binaural interaction
,”
Handb. Percept.
4
,
467
518
.
11.
Dubno
,
J. R.
,
Horwitz
,
A. R.
, and
Ahlstrom
,
J. B.
(
2005
). “
Word recognition in noise at higher-than-normal levels: Decreases in scores and increases in masking
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
118
(
2
),
914
922
.
12.
Duncan
,
K. R.
, and
Aarts
,
N. L.
(
2006
). “
A comparison of the HINT and Quick SIN tests
,”
J. Speech Lang. Pathol. Audiol.
30
(
2
),
86
94
.
13.
Etymotic Research
(
2001
). “
Quicksin speech-in-noise test manual, version 1.3
,”
Technical Report
(
Etymotic Research
, Elk Grove Village, IL).
14.
French
,
N.
, and
Steinberg
,
J.
(
1947
). “
Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
19
,
90
119
.
15.
Hawley
,
M. L.
,
Litovsky
,
R. Y.
, and
Culling
,
J. F.
(
2004
). “
The benefit of binaural hearing in a cocktail party: Effect of location and type of interferer
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
115
(
2
),
833
843
.
16.
House
,
A.
,
Williams
,
C.
,
Hecker
,
M.
, and
Kryter
,
K.
(
1965
). “
Articulation testing methods: Consonantal differentiation with a closed response set
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
37
,
158
166
.
17.
Jerger
,
J.
,
Brown
,
D.
, and
Smith
,
S.
(
1984
). “
Effect of peripheral hearing loss on the masking level difference
,”
Arch. Otolaryngol.
110
(
5
),
290
296
.
18.
Job
,
A.
,
Grateau
,
P.
, and
Picard
,
J.
(
1998
). “
Intrinsic differences in hearing performances between ears revealed by the asymmetrical shooting posture in the army
,”
Hear. Res.
122
(
1-2
),
119
124
.
19.
Killion
,
M. C.
,
Niquette
,
P. A.
,
Gudmundsen
,
G. I.
,
Revit
,
L. J.
, and
Banerjee
,
S.
(
2004
). “
Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
116
,
2395
2405
.
20.
Kobel
,
M.
,
Le Prell
,
C. G.
,
Liu
,
J.
,
Hawks
,
J. W.
, and
Bao
,
J.
(
2017
). “
Noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy: Past findings and future studies
,”
Hear. Res.
349
,
148
154
.
21.
Kreul
,
E. J.
,
Nixon
,
J. C.
,
Bell
,
D. W.
,
Lang
,
J. S.
, and
Schubert
,
E. D.
(
1968
). “
A proposed clinical test of speech discrimination
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
11
(
3
),
536
552
.
22.
Letowski
,
T. R.
, and
Scharine
,
A. A.
(
2017
). “
Correlational analysis of speech intelligibility tests and metrics for speech transmission
,”
Technical Report
(
U.S. Army Research Laboratory
, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD).
23.
Mackersie
,
C.
,
Neuman
,
A. C.
, and
Levitt
,
H.
(
1999
). “
A comparison of response time and word recognition measures using a word-monitoring and closed-set identification task
,”
Ear Hear.
20
(
2
),
140
148
.
24.
Molis
,
M. R.
, and
Summers
,
V.
(
2003
). “
Effects of high presentation levels on recognition of low- and high-frequency speech
,”
Acoust. Res. Lett. Online
4
(
4
),
124
128
.
25.
Moore
,
B. C.
, and
Glasberg
,
B. R.
(
1998
). “
Use of a loudness model for hearing-aid fitting. I. Linear hearing aids
,”
Br. J. Audiol.
32
(
5
),
317
335
.
26.
Nilsson
,
M.
,
Soli
,
S. D.
, and
Sullivan
,
J. A.
(
1994
). “
Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
95
,
1085
1099
.
27.
Plomp
,
R.
(
1978
). “
Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
63
,
533
549
.
28.
Rankovic
,
C. M.
, and
Levy
,
R. M.
(
1997
). “
Estimating articulation scores
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
102
(
6
),
3754
3761
.
29.
Shapiro
,
M. L.
,
Norris
,
J. A.
,
Wilbur
,
J. C.
,
Brungart
,
D. S.
, and
Clavier
,
O. H.
(
2020
). “
TabSINT: Open-source mobile software for distributed studies of hearing
,”
Int. J. Audiol.
59
(
sup1
),
S12
S19
.
30.
U.S. Department of Defense
(
2015
). MIL-STD-1474E,
Design Criteria Standard, Noise Limits
(
U.S. Department of Defense
,
Washington
, DC).
31.
U.S. Department of the Army
(
2017
). AR 40-501,
Medical Services, Standards of Medical Fitness
(
U.S. Department of the Army
,
Washington, DC
).
32.
U.S. Department of the Army
(
2019
). DA PAM 40-502,
Medical Services, Medical Readiness Procedures
(
U.S. Department of the Army
,
Washington, DC
).
33.
Wilson
,
R. H.
,
Carnell
,
C. S.
, and
Cleghorn
,
A. L.
(
2007a
). “
The Words-in-Noise (WIN) test with multitalker babble and speech-spectrum noise maskers
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol.
18
(
6
),
522
529
.
34.
Wilson
,
R. H.
, and
McArdle
,
R.
(
2005
). “
Speech signals used to evaluate functional status of the auditory system
,”
J. Rehabil. Res. Dev.
42
,
79
93
.
35.
Wilson
,
R. H.
,
McArdle
,
R. A.
, and
Smith
,
S. L.
(
2007b
). “
An evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN materials on listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss
,”
J. Speech, Lang., Hear. Res.
50
(
4
),
844
856
.
36.
Wu
,
Y.-H.
,
Stangl
,
E.
,
Chipara
,
O.
,
Hasan
,
S. S.
,
Welhaven
,
A.
, and
Oleson
,
J.
(
2018
). “
Characteristics of real-world signal-to-noise ratios and speech listening situations of older adults with mild-to-moderate hearing loss
,”
Ear Hear.
39
(
2
),
293
304
.
You do not currently have access to this content.