Everyday environments impose acoustical conditions on speech communication that require interlocutors to adapt their behavior to be able to hear and to be heard. Past research has focused mainly on the adaptation of speech level, while few studies investigated how interlocutors adapt their conversational distance as a function of noise level. Similarly, no study tested the interaction between distance and speech level adaptation in noise. In the present study, participant pairs held natural conversations while binaurally listening to identical noise recordings of different realistic environments (range of 53–92 dB sound pressure level), using acoustically transparent headphones. Conversations were in standing or sitting (at a table) conditions. Interlocutor distances were tracked using wireless motion-capture equipment, which allowed subjects to move closer or farther from each other. The results show that talkers adapt their voices mainly according to the noise conditions and much less according to distance. Distance adaptation was highest in the standing condition. Consequently, mainly in the loudest environments, listeners were able to improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at the receiver location in the standing condition compared to the sitting condition, which became less negative. Analytical approximations are provided for the conversational distance as well as the receiver-related speech and SNR.

1.
ANSI
(
1997
). ANSI s3.5-1997,
Methods for Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index, Technical Report
(
Accredited Standards Committee S3, Bioacoustics, The Acoustical Society of America, American National Standards Institute
,
New York
).
2.
Argyle
,
M.
, and
Dean
,
J.
(
1965
). “
Eye-contact, distance and affiliation
,”
Sociometry
28
,
289
304
.
3.
Bavelas
,
J. B.
,
Coates
,
L.
, and
Johnson
,
T.
(
2002
). “
Listener responses as a collaborative process: The role of gaze
,”
J. Commun.
52
(
3
),
566
580
.
4.
Beechey
,
T.
,
Buchholz
,
J. M.
, and
Keidser
,
G.
(
2018
). “
Measuring communication difficulty through effortful speech production during conversation
,”
Speech Commun.
100
,
18
29
.
5.
Bell
,
P. A.
,
Kline
,
L. M.
, and
Barnard
,
W. A.
(
1988
). “
Friendship and freedom of movement as moderators of sex differences in interpersonal distancing
,”
J. Social Psychol.
128
(
3
),
305
310
.
6.
Brimijoin
,
W. O.
,
McShefferty
,
D.
, and
Akeroyd
,
M. A.
(
2012
). “
Undirected head movements of listeners with asymmetrical hearing impairment during a speech-in-noise task
,”
Hear. Res.
283
(
1–2
),
162
168
.
7.
Brungart
,
D. S.
,
Barrett
,
M. E.
,
Cohen
,
J. I.
,
Fodor
,
C.
,
Yancey
,
C. M.
, and
Gordon-Salant
,
S.
(
2020
). “
Objective assessment of speech intelligibility in crowded public spaces
,”
Ear Hear.
41
,
68S
78S
.
8.
Cochran
,
C.
,
Hale
,
W. D.
, and
Hissam
,
C. P.
(
1984
). “
Personal space requirements in indoor versus outdoor locations
,”
J. Psychol.
117
(
1
),
121
123
.
9.
Cochran
,
C.
, and
Urbanczyk
,
S.
(
1982
). “
The effect of availability of vertical space on personal space
,”
J. Psychol.
111
(
1
),
137
140
.
10.
Cooke
,
M.
,
King
,
S.
,
Garnier
,
M.
, and
Aubanel
,
V.
(
2014
). “
The listening talker: A review of human and algorithmic context-induced modifications of speech
,”
Comput. Speech Lang.
28
(
2
),
543
571
.
11.
Grange
,
J. A.
, and
Culling
,
J. F.
(
2016
). “
The benefit of head orientation to speech intelligibility in noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
139
(
2
),
703
712
.
12.
Hadley
,
L. R.
,
Owen
,
B. W.
, and
Whitmer
,
W. M.
(
2019
). “
Speech, movement, and gaze behaviours during dyadic conversation in noise
,”
Sci. Rep.
9
,
10451
.
13.
Hall
,
E. T.
(
1990
).
The Hidden Dimension
(
Anchor Books Editions
,
New York
).
14.
Harrigan
,
J.
(
2005
).
Proxemics, Kinesics, and Gaze
(
Oxford University Press
,
Oxford, UK
), pp.
137
198
.
15.
Hayduk
,
L. A.
(
1983
). “
Personal space: Where we now stand
,”
Psychol. Bull.
94
(
2
),
293
.
16.
IEC
(
2011
). IEC 60268-16, Edition 4.0 (2011-06),
International Standard: Sound System Equipment—Part 16: Objective Rating of Speech Intelligibility by Speech Transmission Index
(
International Electrotechnical Commission
,
Geneva, Switzerland
).
17.
Keidser
,
G.
,
Dillon
,
H.
,
Flax
,
M.
,
Ching
,
T.
, and
Brewer
,
S.
(
2011
). “
The NAL-NL2 prescription procedure
,”
Audiol. Res.
1
(
1
),
88
.
18.
Lane
,
H.
, and
Tranel
,
B.
(
1971
). “
The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
14
(
4
),
677
709
.
19.
Lenth
,
R.
,
Singmann
,
H.
,
Love
,
J.
,
Buerkner
,
P.
, and
Herve
,
M.
(
2018
). “
emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means
,” R package documentation, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/emmeans/emmeans.pdf (accessed 15 October 2020).
20.
Lombard
,
E.
(
1911
). “
Le signe de l'elevation de la voix
” (“The sign of the elevation of the voice”) (2006).
Ann. des Maladiers de l'Oreille, du Larynx, du Nez, et du Pharynx
37
,
101
119
, translated by P. H. Mason.
21.
Matsumoto
,
D. E.
,
Hwang
,
H. C.
, and
Frank
,
M. G.
(
2016
).
The Body: Postures, Gait, Proxemics, and Haptics
(
American Psychological Association
,
Washington, DC
), pp.
387
400
.
22.
Miles
,
K. M.
,
Keidser
,
G.
,
Freeston
,
K.
,
Beechey
,
T.
,
Best
,
V.
, and
Buchholz
,
J. M.
(
2020
). “
Development of the everyday conversational sentences in noise test
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
147
(
3
),
1562
1576
.
23.
Naylor
,
G.
(
2016
). “
Theoretical issues of validity in the measurement of aided speech reception threshold in noise for comparing nonlinear hearing aid systems
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol.
27
(
7
),
504
514
.
24.
Pearsons
,
K. S.
,
Bennett
,
R. L.
, and
Fidell
,
S.
(
1977
).
Speech Levels in Various Noise Environments
(
Office of Health and Ecological Effects, Office of Research and Development
,
US EPA, Washington, DC
).
25.
Pelegrín-García
,
D.
,
Smits
,
B.
,
Brunskog
,
J.
, and
Jeong
,
C.
(
2011
). “
Vocal effort with changing talker-to-listener distance in different acoustic environments
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
129
(
4
),
1981
1990
.
26.
Pinheiro
,
J.
,
Bates
,
D.
,
DebRoy
,
S.
,
Sarkar
,
D.
,
Heisterkamp
,
S.
, and
Van Willigen
,
B.
(
2017
). “
Package ‘nlme.’ linear and nonlinear mixed effects models, version, 3(1)
,” Technical Report.
27.
Remland
,
M. S.
,
Jones
,
T. S.
, and
Brinkman
,
H.
(
1991
). “
Proxemic and haptic behavior in three european countries
,”
J. Nonverbal Behav.
15
(
4
),
215
232
.
28.
Remland
,
M. S.
,
Jones
,
T. S.
, and
Brinkman
,
H.
(
1995
). “
Interpersonal distance, body orientation, and touch: Effects of culture, gender, and age
,”
J. Social Psychol.
135
(
3
),
281
297
.
29.
Shuter
,
R.
(
1977
). “
A field study of nonverbal communication in germany, italy, and the united states
,”
Commun. Monogr.
44
(
4
),
298
305
.
30.
Smeds
,
K.
,
Wolters
,
F.
, and
Rung
,
M.
(
2015
). “
Estimation of signal-to-noise ratios in realistic sound scenarios
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol.
26
(
2
),
183
196
.
31.
Sommer
,
R.
(
2002
). “
Personal space in a digital age
,” in Handbook of Environmental Psychology, edited by
R. B.
Bechtel
and
A.
Churchman
(
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
,
New York
), pp.
647
660
.
32.
Sumby
,
W. H.
, and
Pollack
,
I.
(
1954
). “
Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
26
(
2
),
212
215
.
33.
Sussman
,
N. M.
, and
Rosenfeld
,
H. M.
(
1982
). “
Influence of culture, language, and sex on conversational distance
,”
J. Personality Social Psychol.
42
(
1
),
66
.
34.
Vertegaal
,
R.
,
Slagter
,
R.
,
Van der Veer
,
G.
, and
Nijholt
,
A.
(
2001
). “
Eye gaze patterns in conversations: There is more to conversational agents than meets the eyes
,” in
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
, May 8–13, Seattle, WA, pp.
301
308
.
35.
Weisser
,
A.
, and
Buchholz
,
J.
(
2019
). “
Conversational speech levels and signal-to-noise ratios in realistic acoustic conditions
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
145
(
1
),
349
360
.
36.
Weisser
,
A.
,
Buchholz
,
J. M.
, and
Keidser
,
G.
(
2019a
). “
Complex acoustic environments: Review, framework, and subjective model
,”
Trends Hear.
23
,
1
20
.
37.
Weisser
,
A.
,
Buchholz
,
J.
,
Oreinos
,
C.
,
Galloway
,
J.
,
Beechey
,
T.
,
Davila
,
J.
, and
Keidser
,
G.
(
2019b
). “
The ambisonic recordings of typical environments (ARTE) database
,”
Acta Acust. united Ac.
105
(
4
),
695
713
.
38.
Wu
,
Y.-H.
,
Stangl
,
E.
,
Chipara
,
O.
,
Hasan
,
S. S.
,
Welhaven
,
A.
, and
Oleson
,
J.
(
2018
). “
Characteristics of real-world signal to noise ratios and speech listening situations of older adults with mild to moderate hearing loss
,”
Ear Hear.
39
(
2
),
293
304
.

Supplementary Material

You do not currently have access to this content.