The spatial properties of a noise field can be described by a spatial coherence function. Synthetic multichannel noise signals exhibiting a specific spatial coherence can be generated by properly mixing a set of uncorrelated, possibly non-stationary, signals. The mixing matrix can be obtained by decomposing the spatial coherence matrix. As proposed in a widely used method, the factorization can be performed by means of a Choleski or eigenvalue decomposition. In this work, the limitations of these two methods are discussed and addressed. In particular, specific properties of the mixing matrix are analyzed, namely, the spectral smoothness and the mix balance. The first quantifies the mixing matrix-filters variation across frequency and the second quantifies the number of input signals that contribute to each output signal. Three methods based on the unitary Procrustes solution are proposed to enhance the spectral smoothness, the mix balance, and both properties jointly. A performance evaluation confirms the improvements of the mixing matrix in terms of objective measures. Furthermore, the evaluation results show that the error between the target and the generated coherence is lowered by increasing the spectral smoothness of the mixing matrix.

1.
Adami
,
A.
,
Disch
,
S.
,
Steba
,
G.
, and
Herre
,
J.
(
2016
). “
Assessing applause density perception using synthesized layered applause signals
,” in
Proceedings of the Conference on Digital Audio Effects
, September 5–9, Brno, Czech Republic, pp.
183
189
.
2.
Adrian
,
J.-A.
,
Gerkmann
,
T.
,
van de Par
,
S.
, and
Bitzer
,
J.
(
2017
). “
Synthesis of perceptually plausible multichannel noise signals controlled by real world statistical noise properties
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
65
(
11
),
914
928
.
2.
AudioLabs
(
2020
). https://www.audiolabs-erlangen.de/resources/2020-JASA-CCR (Last viewed January 30, 2021).
3.
Bienvenu
,
G.
, and
Kopp
,
L.
(
1981
). “
Adaptive high resolution spatial discrimination of passive sources
,” in
Underwater Acoustics and Signal Processing
, edited by
L.
Bjørnø
(
Springer
Netherlands, Dordrecht
), pp.
509
515
.
4.
Cook
,
R. K.
,
Waterhouse
,
R. V.
,
Berendt
,
R. D.
,
Edelman
,
S.
, and
Thompson
,
M. C.
(
1955
). “
Measurement of correlation coefficients in reverberant sound fields
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
27
(
6
),
1072
1077
.
5.
Corcos
,
G.
(
1964
). “
The structure of the turbulent pressure field in boundary-layer flows
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
18
(
3
),
353
378
.
6.
Cron
,
B. F.
, and
Sherman
,
C. H.
(
1962
). “
Spatial-correlation functions for various noise models
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
34
(
11
),
1732
1736
.
7.
Dal-Degan
,
N.
, and
Prati
,
C.
(
1988
). “
Acoustic noise analysis and speech enhancement techniques for mobile radio applications
,”
Signal Process.
15
,
43
56
.
8.
Dietzen
,
T.
,
Doclo
,
S.
,
Moonen
,
M.
, and
van Waterschoot
,
T.
(
2020
). “
Integrated sidelobe cancellation and linear prediction Kalman filter for joint multi-microphone speech dereverberation, interfering speech cancellation, and noise reduction
,”
IEEE Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process.
28
,
740
754
.
9.
Elko
,
G. W.
(
2000
). “
Superdirectional microphone arrays
,” in
Acoustic Signal Processing for Telecommunication
, edited by
S. L.
Gay
and
J.
Benesty
(
Kluwer Academic
,
Hingham, MA
), Chap. 10, pp.
181
237
.
10.
Elko
,
G. W.
(
2001
). “
Spatial coherence functions
,” in
Microphone Arrays: Signal Processing Techniques and Applications
, edited by
M.
Brandstein
and
D.
Ward
(
Springer-Verlag
,
New York
), Chap. 4, pp.
61
85
.
11.
Epain
,
N.
, and
Jin
,
C. T.
(
2016
). “
Spherical harmonic signal covariance and sound field diffuseness
,”
IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process.
24
(
10
),
1796
1807
.
12.
Jacobsen
,
F.
, and
Roisin
,
T.
(
2000
). “
The coherence of reverberant sound fields
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
108
,
204
210
.
13.
Gower
,
J. C.
, and
Dijksterhuis
,
G. B.
(
2004
).
Procrustes Problems
,
Vol.30
(
Oxford University Press
,
Oxford, UK
).
14.
Habets
,
E. A.
,
Cohen
,
I.
, and
Gannot
,
S.
(
2008
). “
Generating nonstationary multisensor signals under a spatial coherence constraint
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
124
(
5
),
2911
2917
.
15.
Karasalo
,
I.
(
1986
). “
Estimating the covariance matrix by signal subspace averaging
,”
IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process.
34
(
1
),
8
12
.
16.
Mirabilii
,
D.
, and
Habets
,
E. A. P.
(
2018
). “
Simulating multi-channel wind noise based on the Corcos model
,” in
Proceedings of the International Workshop on Acoustic Signal Enhancement (IWAENC)
, September 17–20, Tokyo, Japan.
17.
Mirabilii
,
D.
, and
Habets
,
E.
(
2019
). “
Multi-channel wind noise reduction using the Corcos model
,” in
Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)
, May 12–17, Brighton, UK, pp.
646
650
.
18.
Mirabilii
,
D.
, and
Habets
,
E.
(
2020
). “
Spatial coherence-aware multi-channel wind noise reduction
,”
IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process.
28
,
1974
1987
.
19.
Mirabilii
,
D.
,
Lakshminarayana
,
K. K.
,
Mack
,
W.
, and
Habets
,
E. A.
(
2020
). “
Data-driven wind speed estimation using multiple microphones
,” in
Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)
, May 4–8, Barcelona, Spain, pp.
576
580
.
20.
Schlecht
,
S. J.
, and
Habets
,
E. A. P.
(
2015
). “
Time-varying feedback matrices in feedback delay networks and their application in artificial reverberation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
138
,
1389
1398
.
21.
Schlecht
,
S. J.
, and
Habets
,
E. A. P.
(
2018
). “
Sign-agnostic matrix design for spatial artificial reverberation with feedback delay networks
,” in
Proceedings of the AES International Conference on Spatial Reproduction-Aesthetics and Science
, August 7–9, Tokyo, Japan.
22.
Thüne
,
P.
, and
Enzner
,
G.
(
2017
). “
Maximum-likelihood approach with Bayesian refinement for multichannel-wiener postfiltering
,”
IEEE Trans. Signal Process.
65
(
13
),
3399
3413
.
You do not currently have access to this content.