Understanding the potential effects of pile driving sounds on marine wildlife is essential for regulating offshore wind developments. Here, tracking data from 24 harbour seals were used to quantify effects and investigate sensitivity to the methods used to predict these. The Aquarius pile driving model was used to model source characteristics and acoustic propagation loss (16 Hz–20 kHz). Predicted cumulative sound exposure levels (SELcums) experienced by each seal were compared to different auditory weighting functions and damage thresholds to estimate temporary (TTS) and permanent (PTS) threshold shift occurrence. Each approach produced markedly different results; however, the most recent criteria established by Southall et al. [(2019) Aquat. Mamm. 45, 125–232] suggests that TTS occurrence was low (17% of seals). Predictions of seal density during pile driving made by Russell et al. [(2016) J. Appl. Ecol. 53, 1642–1652] were compared to distance from the wind farm and predicted single-strike sound exposure levels (SELss) by multiple approaches. Predicted seal density significantly decreased within 25 km or above SELss (averaged across depths and pile installations) of 145 dB re 1 μPa2⋅s. However, there was substantial variation in SELss with depth and installation, and thus in the predicted relationship with seal density. These results highlight uncertainty in estimated effects, which should be considered in future assessments.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
June 2020
June 16 2020
Estimating the effects of pile driving sounds on seals: Pitfalls and possibilitiesa)
Special Collection:
The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life
Katherine F. Whyte;
Katherine F. Whyte
1
Sea Mammal Research Unit, Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St Andrews
, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 8LB, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
Debbie J. F. Russell;
Debbie J. F. Russell
1
Sea Mammal Research Unit, Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St Andrews
, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 8LB, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
Carol E. Sparling;
Carol E. Sparling
e)
2
SMRU Consulting, Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St Andrews
, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 8LB, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
Bas Binnerts;
Bas Binnerts
3
TNO, Acoustics and Sonar expertise group
, Oude Waalsdorperweg 63, 2597 AK, The Hague, Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
Gordon D. Hastie
Gordon D. Hastie
f)
1
Sea Mammal Research Unit, Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St Andrews
, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 8LB, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
b)
Electronic mail: kfw5@st-andrews.ac.uk, ORCID: 0000-0003-3388-9603.
c)
Also at: Centre for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modelling, The Observatory, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9LZ, UK
d)
ORCID: 0000-0002-1969-102X.
e)
ORCID: 0000-0001-7658-5111.
f)
ORCID: 0000-0002-9773-2755.
a)
This paper is part of a special issue on The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life.
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 147, 3948–3958 (2020)
Article history
Received:
December 31 2019
Accepted:
May 27 2020
Citation
Katherine F. Whyte, Debbie J. F. Russell, Carol E. Sparling, Bas Binnerts, Gordon D. Hastie; Estimating the effects of pile driving sounds on seals: Pitfalls and possibilities. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 June 2020; 147 (6): 3948–3958. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0001408
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Citing articles via
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Short-time coherence between repeated room impulse response measurements
Karolina Prawda, Sebastian J. Schlecht, et al.
Efficient design of complex-valued neural networks with application to the classification of transient acoustic signals
Vlad S. Paul, Philip A. Nelson