Observer-based procedures are used to assess auditory behavior in infants, often incorporating adaptive tracking algorithms. These procedures are reliable, but effects of modifications made to accommodate infant testing are not fully understood. One modification is that observation intervals are undefined for the listener, introducing signal-temporal uncertainty and increasing the likelihood that listener response bias will influence estimates of performance. The effect of these factors was evaluated by comparing threshold estimates obtained from adults using two tasks: (1) single-interval, yes/no and (2) two-interval, forced-choice. Detection thresholds were estimated adaptively for a 1000-Hz FM tone in quiet and for a word presented in two-talker speech masking. Trials were initiated and judged by the observer (observer-based) or the listener (listener-based). Thus, listening intervals were temporally uncertain in observer-based procedures and temporally defined in listener-based procedures. Thresholds were higher for observer-based relative to corresponding listener-based procedures. The magnitude of this difference was similar across the yes/no and two-interval tasks, and was larger for masked word detection than tone detection in quiet. Listeners adopted a conservative criterion when tested using the observer-based, yes/no procedure, but modeling results suggest that signal-temporal uncertainty accounts for the largest portion of the threshold difference between observer-based and listener-based procedures.

1.
Abdala
,
C.
, and
Folsom
,
R. C.
(
1995
). “
The development of frequency resolution in humans as revealed by the auditory brain-stem response recorded with notched-noise masking
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
98
(
2
),
921
930
.
2.
Allen
,
P.
, and
Wightman
,
F.
(
1994
). “
Psychometric functions for children's detection of tones in noise
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
37
(
1
),
205
215
.
3.
ANSI
(
2010
).
S3.6, American National Standard Specification for Audiometers
(
American National Standards Institute
,
New York
).
4.
Best
,
V.
,
Ozmeral
,
E. J.
, and
Shinn-Cunningham
,
B. G.
(
2007
). “
Visually-guided attention enhances target identification in a complex auditory scene
,”
J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.
8
(
2
),
294
304
.
5.
Bonino
,
A. Y.
, and
Leibold
,
L. J.
(
2008
). “
The effect of signal-temporal uncertainty on detection in bursts of noise or a random-frequency complex
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
124
(
5
),
EL321
EL327
.
6.
Browning
,
J.
,
Buss
,
E.
, and
Leibold
,
L. J.
(
2014
). “
Preliminary evaluation of a two-interval, two-alternative infant behavioral testing procedure
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
136
(
3
),
EL236
EL241
.
7.
Chang
,
P.
, and
Viemeister
,
N. F.
(
1991
). “
Temporal windows for signals presented at uncertain times
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
90
(
4
),
2248
2248
.
8.
Dai
,
H.
(
1995
). “
On measuring psychometric functions: A comparison of constant-stimulus and adaptive up-down methods
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
98
(
6
),
3135
3139
.
9.
Egan
,
J. P.
,
Greenberg
,
G. Z.
, and
Schulman
,
A. I.
(
1961
). “
Operating characteristics, signal detectability, and the method of free response
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
33
(
8
),
993
1007
.
10.
Green
,
D. M.
(
1960
). “
Psychoacoustics and detection theory
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
32
(
10
),
1189
1203
.
11.
Green
,
D. M.
, and
Swets
,
J. A.
(
1973
).
Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics
(
Krieger
,
Huntington, NY)
.
12.
Green
,
D. M.
, and
Weber
,
D. L.
(
1980
). “
Detection of temporally uncertain signals
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
67
(
4
),
1304
1311
.
13.
Grieco-Calub
,
T. M.
,
Litovsky
,
R. Y.
, and
Werner
,
L. A.
(
2008
). “
Using the observer-based psychophysical procedure to assess localization acuity in toddlers who use bilateral cochlear implants
,”
Otolaryngol. Neurotol.
29
(
2
),
235
239
.
14.
Hall
,
J. W. III
, and
Grose
,
J. H.
(
1991
). “
Notched-noise measures of frequency selectivity in adults and children using fixed-masker-level and fixed-signal-level presentation
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
34
(
3
),
651
660
.
15.
Jones
,
M. R.
, and
Yee
,
W.
(
1993
). “
Attending to auditory events: The role of temporal organization
,” in
Thinking in Sound: The Cognitive Psychology of Human Audition
, edited by
S.
McAdams
and
E.
Bigand
(
Clarendon/Oxford University Press
,
New York)
, pp.
69
112
.
16.
Koo
,
T. K.
, and
Li
,
M. Y.
(
2016
). “
A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research
,”
J. Chiro. Med.
15
(
2
),
155
163
.
17.
Lecluyse
,
W.
, and
Meddis
,
R.
(
2009
). “
A simple single-interval adaptive procedure for estimating thresholds in normal and impaired listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
126
(
5
),
2570
2579
.
18.
Leibold
,
L. J.
,
Bonino
,
A. Y.
, and
Buss
,
E.
(
2016
). “
Masked speech perception in infants, children and adults
,”
Ear Hear.
37
(
3
),
345
353
.
19.
Leibold
,
L. J.
, and
Werner
,
L. A.
(
2006
). “
Effect of masker-frequency variability on the detection performance of infants and adults
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
119
(
6
),
3960
3970
.
20.
Leis-Rossio
,
B.
, and
Small
,
A. M.
(
1986
). “
Temporal specificity
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
80
(
S1
),
S92
S92
.
21.
Levitt
,
H. C. C. H.
(
1971
). “
Transformed up–down methods in psychoacoustics
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
49
(
2B
),
467
477
.
22.
Lidén
,
G.
, and
Kankkunen
,
A.
(
1969
). “
Visual reinforcement audiometry
,”
Acta Oto-Laryngol.
67
(
2-6
),
281
292
.
23.
Macmillan
,
N. A.
, and
Creelman
,
C. D.
(
2004
).
Detection Theory A User's Guide
, 2nd ed. (
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
,
London)
, p.
21
.
24.
MacPherson
,
A.
, and
Akeroyd
,
M. A.
(
2014
). “
Variations in the slope of the psychometric functions for speech intelligibility: A systematic survey
,”
Trends Hear.
18
,
2331216514537722
.
25.
Marshall
,
L.
(
1991
). “
Decision criteria for pure-tone detection used by two age groups of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners
,”
J. Gerontol.
46
(
2
),
P67
P70
.
26.
Marshall
,
L.
, and
Jesteadt
,
W.
(
1986
). “
Comparison of pure-tone audibility thresholds obtained with audiological and two-interval forced-choice procedures
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
29
(
1
),
82
91
.
27.
Moore
,
J. K.
, and
Linthicum
,
F. H.
, Jr.
(
2007
). “
The human auditory system: A timeline of development
,”
Int. J. Audiol.
46
(
9
),
460
478
.
28.
Moore
,
J.
,
Thompson
,
G.
, and
Thompson
,
M.
Auditory localization of infants as a function of reinforcement conditions
,”
J. Speech Hear. Dis.
40
(
1
),
29
34
(
1975
).
29.
Okabe
,
K.
,
Tanaka
,
S.
,
Hamada
,
H.
,
Tanetoshi
,
M.
, and
Funai
,
H.
(
1988
). “
Acoustic impedance measurement on normal ears of children
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Jpn.
9
(
6
),
287
294
.
30.
Olsho
,
L. W.
,
Koch
,
E. G.
,
Halpin
,
C. F.
, and
Carter
,
E. A.
(
1987
). “
An observer-based psychoacoustic procedure for use with young infants
,”
Dev. Psychol.
23
(
5
),
627
640
.
31.
Watson
,
C. S.
, and
Nichols
,
T. L.
(
1976
). “
Detectability of auditory signals presented without defined observation intervals
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
59
(
3
),
655
668
.
32.
Werner
,
L. A.
(
1995
). “
Observer-based approaches to human infant psychoacoustics
,” in
Methods in Comparative Psychoacoustics
(
Birkhäuser
,
Basel, Switzerland)
, pp.
135
146
.
33.
Werner
,
L. A.
, and
Gillenwater
,
J. M.
(
1990
). “
Pure-tone sensitivity of 2- to 5-week-old infants
,”
Behav. Dev.
13
(
3
),
355
375
.
34.
Werner
,
L. A.
,
Mancl
,
L. R.
, and
Folsom
,
R. C.
(
1996
). “
Preliminary observations on the development of auditory sensitivity in infants with Down syndrome
,”
Ear Hear.
17
(
6
),
455
468
.
35.
Widen
,
J. E.
,
Folsom
,
R. C.
,
Cone-Wesson
,
B.
,
Carty
,
L.
,
Dunnell
,
J. J.
,
Koebsell
,
K.
,
Levi
,
A.
,
Mancl
,
L.
,
Ohlrich
,
B.
,
Trouba
,
S.
, and
Gorga
,
M. P.
(
2000
). “
Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: Hearing status at 8 to 12 months corrected age using a visual reinforcement audiometry protocol
,”
Ear Hear.
21
(
5
),
471
487
.
36.
Wilson
,
W. R.
, and
Thompson
,
G.
(
1984
). “
Behavioral audiometry
,” in
Pediatric Audiology
, edited by
J.
Jerger
(
College Hill Press
,
San Diego, CA
).
37.
Yeshurun
,
Y.
,
Carrasco
,
M.
, and
Maloney
,
L. T.
(
2008
). “
Bias and sensitivity in two-interval forced choice procedures: Tests of the difference model
,”
Vis. Res.
48
(
17
),
1837
1851
.
You do not currently have access to this content.