Observer-based procedures are used to assess auditory behavior in infants, often incorporating adaptive tracking algorithms. These procedures are reliable, but effects of modifications made to accommodate infant testing are not fully understood. One modification is that observation intervals are undefined for the listener, introducing signal-temporal uncertainty and increasing the likelihood that listener response bias will influence estimates of performance. The effect of these factors was evaluated by comparing threshold estimates obtained from adults using two tasks: (1) single-interval, yes/no and (2) two-interval, forced-choice. Detection thresholds were estimated adaptively for a 1000-Hz FM tone in quiet and for a word presented in two-talker speech masking. Trials were initiated and judged by the observer (observer-based) or the listener (listener-based). Thus, listening intervals were temporally uncertain in observer-based procedures and temporally defined in listener-based procedures. Thresholds were higher for observer-based relative to corresponding listener-based procedures. The magnitude of this difference was similar across the yes/no and two-interval tasks, and was larger for masked word detection than tone detection in quiet. Listeners adopted a conservative criterion when tested using the observer-based, yes/no procedure, but modeling results suggest that signal-temporal uncertainty accounts for the largest portion of the threshold difference between observer-based and listener-based procedures.
Skip Nav Destination
,
Article navigation
March 2020
March 12 2020
Yes/no and two-interval forced-choice tasks with listener-based vs observer-based responses
Lori J. Leibold;
Lori J. Leibold
a)
1
Center for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital
, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Emily Buss
Emily Buss
2
Departement of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Lori J. Leibold
1,a)
Emily Buss
2
1
Center for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital
, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA
2
Departement of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
a)
Electronic mail: [email protected]
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 147, 1588–1596 (2020)
Article history
Received:
October 07 2019
Accepted:
February 24 2020
Citation
Lori J. Leibold, Emily Buss; Yes/no and two-interval forced-choice tasks with listener-based vs observer-based responses. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 March 2020; 147 (3): 1588–1596. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0000894
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
Related Content
Priming of lowpass-filtered speech affects response bias, not sensitivity, in a bandwidth discrimination task
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2013)
Effect of response context and masker type on word recognition in school-age children and adults
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2016)
Many tasks, same outcome: Role of training task on learning and maintenance of noise-vocoded speech
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2022)
The effect of context duration on Mandarin listeners' tone normalization
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (July 2014)
Factors responsible for remote-frequency masking in children and adults
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (December 2016)