To capture the demands of real-world listening, laboratory-based speech-in-noise tasks must better reflect the types of speech and environments listeners encounter in everyday life. This article reports the development of original sentence materials that were produced spontaneously with varying vocal efforts. These sentences were extracted from conversations between a talker pair (female/male) communicating in different realistic acoustic environments to elicit normal, raised and loud vocal efforts. In total, 384 sentences were extracted to provide four equivalent lists of 16 sentences at the three efforts for the two talkers. The sentences were presented to 32 young, normally hearing participants in stationary noise at five signal-to-noise ratios from −8 to 0 dB in 2 dB steps. Psychometric functions were fitted for each sentence, revealing an average 50% speech reception threshold (SRT50) of −5.2 dB, and an average slope of 17.2%/dB. Sentences were then level-normalised to adjust their individual SRT50 to the mean (−5.2 dB). The sentences may be combined with realistic background noise to provide an assessment method that better captures the perceptual demands of everyday communication.

1.
Alku
,
P.
,
Vintturi
,
J.
, and
Vilkman
,
E.
(
2001
). “
The use of fundamental frequency raising as a strategy for increasing vocal intensity in soft, normal, and loud phonation
,” in
Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (EuroSpeech 2001), Aalborg, Denmark
, Vol. 2, pp.
919
922
.
2.
ANSI S3.5
(R2012). (
1997
).
American National Standard: Methods for Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index
(
Acoustical Society of America
,
New York
), 1969(R 1986),
1
35
.
3.
Beechey
,
T.
,
Buchholz
,
J. M.
, and
Keidser
,
G.
(
2018
). “
Measuring communication difficulty through effortful speech production during conversation
,”
Speech Commun.
100
(
April
),
18
29
.
4.
Bench
,
J.
,
Kowal
,
A.
, and
Bamford
,
J.
(
1979
). “
The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children
,”
Br. J. Audiol.
13
(
3
),
108
112
.
5.
Best
,
V.
,
Keidser
,
G.
,
Buchholz
,
J. M.
, and
Freeston
,
K.
(
2015
). “
An examination of speech reception thresholds measured in a simulated reverberant cafeteria environment
,”
Int. J. Audiol.
54
(
10
),
682
690
.
6.
Best
,
V.
,
Keidser
,
G.
,
Buchholz
,
J. M.
, and
Freeston
,
K.
(
2016
). “
Development and preliminary evaluation of a new test of ongoing speech comprehension
,”
Int. J. Audiol.
55
(
1
),
45
52
.
7.
Boersma
,
P.
, and
Weenink
,
D.
(
2018
). “
Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [computer program]
,” http://praat.org (Last viewed September 13, 2019).
8.
Branigan
,
H. P.
,
Catchpole
,
C. M.
, and
Pickering
,
M. J.
(
2011
). “
What makes dialogues easy to understand?
,”
Lang. Cognit. Process.
26
(
10
),
1667
1686
.
9.
Bronkhorst
,
A. W.
,
Brand
,
T.
, and
Wagener
,
K.
(
2002
). “
Evaluation of context effects in sentence recognition
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
111
(
6
),
2874
2886
.
10.
Brungart
,
D. S.
,
Sheffield
,
B. M.
, and
Kubli
,
L. R.
(
2014
). “
Development of a test battery for evaluating speech perception in complex listening environments
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
136
(
2
),
777
790
.
11.
Byrne
,
D.
,
Dillon
,
H.
,
Tran
,
K.
,
Arlinger
,
S.
,
Wilbraham
,
K.
,
Cox
,
R.
, and
Kiessling
,
J.
(
1994
). “
An international comparison of long-term average speech spectra
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
96
(
4
),
2108
2120
.
12.
Castellanos
,
A.
,
Benedí
,
J.-M.
, and
Casacuberta
,
F.
(
1996
). “
An analysis of general acoustic-phonetic features for Spanish speech produced with the Lombard effect
,”
Speech Commun.
20
(
1-2
),
23
35
.
13.
CHABA
(
1988
). “
Speech understanding and aging
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
83
,
859
895
.
14.
Cipriano
,
M.
,
Astolfi
,
A.
, and
Pelegrín-García
,
D.
(
2017
). “
Combined effect of noise and room acoustics on vocal effort in simulated classrooms
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
141
(
1
),
EL51
EL56
.
15.
Cooke
,
M.
,
Mayo
,
C.
, and
Villegas
,
J.
(
2014
). “
The contribution of durational and spectral changes to the Lombard speech intelligibility benefit
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
135
(
2
),
874
883
.
16.
Cord
,
M.
,
Baskent
,
D.
,
Kalluri
,
S.
, and
Moore
,
B. C. J.
(
2007
). “
Disparity between clinical assessment and real-world performance of hearing aids
,”
Hear Rev
14
,
22
26
.
17.
Davis
,
C.
,
Kim
,
J.
,
Grauwinkel
,
K.
, and
Mixdorff
,
H.
(
2006
). “
Lombard speech: Auditory (A), Visual (V) and AV effects
,”
Proc. Speech Prosody
2
(
V
),
361
365
.
18.
Dawson
,
P. W.
,
Hersbach
,
A. A.
, and
Swanson
,
B. A.
(
2013
). “
An adaptive Australian Sentence Test in Noise (AuSTIN
),”
Ear Hear.
34
(
5
),
592
600
.
19.
Diehl
,
R. L.
,
Lindblom
,
B.
,
Hoemeke
,
K. A.
, and
Fahey
,
R. P.
(
1996
). “
On explaining certain male-female differences in the phonetic realization of vowel categories
,”
J. Phonetics
24
(
2
),
187
208
.
20.
Dreschler
,
W. A.
,
Verschuure
,
H.
,
Ludvigsen
,
C.
, and
Westermann
,
S.
(
2001
). “
ICRA noises: Artificial noise signals with speech-like spectral and temporal properties for hearing instrument assessment (Ruidos ICRA: Señates de ruido artificial con espectro similar al habla y propiedades temporales para pruebas de instrumentos auditiv
”),
Int. J. Audiol.
40
(
3
),
148
157
.
21.
Ernestus
,
M.
, and
Warner
,
N.
(
2011
). “
An introduction to reduced pronunciation variants
,”
J. Phonetics
39
(
3
),
253
260
.
22.
Geissler
,
G.
, and
Arweiler
,
I.
(
2014
). “
Speech reception threshold benefits in cochlear implant users with an adaptive beamformer in real life situations
,”
Cochlear Implants Int.
16
(
2
),
69
76
.
23.
Gibson
,
E.
(
1998
). “
Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies
,”
Cognition
68
(
1
),
1
76
.
24.
Gifford
,
R. H.
,
Olund
,
A. P.
, and
DeJong
,
M.
(
2011
). “
Improving speech perception in noise for children with cochlear implants
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol.
22
(
9
),
623
632
.
25.
Hagerman
,
B.
(
1982
). “
Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise
,”
Scand. Audiol.
11
(
2
),
79
87
.
26.
Hochmuth
,
S.
,
Kollmeier
,
B.
,
Brand
,
T.
, and
Jürgens
,
T.
(
2015
). “
Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests
,”
Int. J. Audiol.
54
,
62
70
.
27.
Holmes
,
E.
,
Folkeard
,
P.
,
Johnsrude
,
I. S.
, and
Scollie
,
S.
(
2018
). “
Semantic context improves speech intelligibility and reduces listening effort for listeners with hearing impairment
,”
Int. J. Audiol.
57
(
7
),
438
492
.
28.
Jansen
,
S.
,
Koning
,
R.
,
Wouters
,
J.
, and
Van Wieringen
,
A.
(
2014
). “
Development and validation of the Leuven intelligibility sentence test with male speaker (LIST-m)
,”
Int. J. Audiol.
53
(
1
),
55
59
.
29.
Jerger
,
J.
(
2009
). “
Ecologically valid measures of hearing aid performance
,”
Starkey Audiol. Ser.
1
,
1
14
.
30.
Keidser
,
G.
,
Ching
,
T.
,
Dillon
,
H.
,
Agung
,
K.
,
Brew
,
C.
,
Brewer
,
S.
,
Fisher
,
M.
,
Foster
,
L.
,
Grant
F.
, and
Storey
,
L.
(
2002
). “
The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) CDs of speech and noise for hearing aid evaluation: Normative data and potential applications
,”
Aust. N. Z. J. Audiol.
24
(
1
),
16
35
.
31.
Kelly
,
H.
,
Lin
,
G.
,
Sankaran
,
N.
,
Xia
,
J.
,
Kalluri
,
S.
, and
Carlile
,
S.
(
2017
). “
Development and evaluation of a mixed gender, multi-talker matrix sentence test in Australian English
,”
Int. J. Audiol.
56
(
2
),
85
91
.
32.
Kiessling
,
J.
,
Pichora-Fuller
,
M. K.
,
Gatehouse
,
S.
,
Stephens
,
D.
,
Arlinger
,
S.
,
Chisolm
,
T.
, and
von Wedel
,
H.
(
2003
). “
Candidature for and delivery of audiological services: Special needs of older people
,”
Int. J. Audiol.
42
(
Suppl. 2
),
2S92
2S101
.
33.
Killion
,
M. C.
,
Schulein
,
R.
,
Christensen
,
L.
,
Fabry
,
D.
,
Revit
,
L.
,
Niquette
,
P.
, and
Chung
,
K.
(
1998
). “
Real-world performance of an ITE directional microphone
,”
Hear. J.
51
,
1
6
.
34.
Laan
,
G. P.
(
1997
). “
The contribution of intonation, segmental durations, and spectral features to the perception of a spontaneous and a read speaking style
,”
Speech Commun.
22
(
1
),
43
65
.
35.
Lane
,
H.
,
Tranel
,
B.
, and
Sisson
,
C.
(
1970
). “
Regulation of voice communication by sensory dynamics
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
47
(
2B
),
618
624
.
36.
Lombard
,
E.
(
1911
). “
Le signe de l'elevation de la voix
,” (“The sign of the raising of the voice”)
Ann. Mal. L'Oreille Larynx
101
119
.
37.
MacPherson
,
A.
, and
Akeroyd
,
M. A.
(
2014
). “
Variations in the slope of the psychometric functions for speech intelligibility: A systematic survey
,”
Trends Hear.
18
,
1
26
.
38.
Nilsson
,
M.
,
Soli
,
S. D.
, and
Sullivan
,
J. A.
(
1994
). “
Development of the Hearing In Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
95
(
2
),
1085
1099
.
39.
Oreinos
,
C.
, and
Buchholz
,
J. M.
(
2015
). “
Objective analysis of ambisonics for hearing aid applications: Effect of listener's head, room reverberation, and directional microphones
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
137
(
6
),
3447
3465
.
40.
Oreinos
,
C.
, and
Buchholz
,
J. M.
(
2016
). “
Evaluation of loudspeaker-based virtual sound environments for testing directional hearing aids
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol.
27
(
7
),
541
556
.
41.
Pichora-Fuller
,
M. K.
(
2007
). “
Audition and cognition: What audiologists need to know about listening
,” in
Hearing Care for Adults
, edited by
C.
Palmer
and
R.
Seewald
(
Phonak
,
Stäfa, Switzerland
), pp.
71
85
.
42.
Schneider
,
B. A.
,
Pichora-Fuller
,
M. K.
, and
Daneman
,
M.
(
2010
). “
Effects of senescent changes in audition and cognition on spoken language comprehension
,” in
The Aging Auditory System
, edited by
S.
Gordon-Salant
,
R. D.
Frisina
,
A. N.
Popper
, and
R. R.
Fay
(
Springer
,
New York
), pp.
167
210
.
43.
Summers
,
W. Van
,
Pisoni
,
D. B.
,
Bernacki
,
R. H.
,
Pedlow
,
R. I.
, and
Stokes
,
M. A.
(
1988
). “
Effects of noise on speech production: Acoustic and perceptual analyses
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
84
(
3
),
917
928
.
44.
van Rooij
,
J. C. G. M.
, and
Plomp
,
R.
(
1991
). “
The effect of linguistic entropy on speech perception in noise in young and elderly listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
90
(
6
),
2985
2991
.
45.
Van Wieringen
,
A.
, and
Wouters
,
J.
(
2008
). “
LIST and LINT: Sentences and numbers for quantifying speech understanding in severely impaired listeners for Flanders and the Netherlands
,”
Int. J. Audiol.
47
(
6
),
348
355
.
46.
Weisser
,
A.
, and
Buchholz
,
J. M.
(
2019
). “
Conversational speech levels and signal-to-noise ratios in realistic acoustic conditions
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
145
(
1
),
349
360
.
47.
Weisser
,
A.
,
Buchholz
,
J. M.
,
Oreinos
,
C.
,
Badajoz-Davila
,
J.
,
Galloway
,
J.
,
Beechey
,
T.
, and
Keidser
,
G.
(
2019
). “
The ambisonic recordings of typical environments (ARTE) database
,”
Acta Acust. Acust.
105
(
4
),
695
713
.
You do not currently have access to this content.