Listeners with cochlear implants (CIs) typically show poor sensitivity to the temporal-envelope pitch of high-rate pulse trains. Sensitivity to interaural time differences improves when adding pulses with short inter-pulse intervals (SIPIs) to high-rate pulse trains. In the current study, monaural temporal-pitch sensitivity with SIPI pulses was investigated for six CI listeners. Amplitude-modulated single-electrode stimuli, representing the coding of the fundamental frequency (F0) in the envelope of a high-rate carrier, were used. Two SIPI-insertion approaches, five modulation depths, two typical speech-F0s, and two carrier rates were tested. SIPI pulses were inserted either in every amplitude-modulation period (full-rate SIPI) to support the F0 cue or in every other amplitude-modulation period (half-rate SIPI) to circumvent a potential rate limitation at higher F0s. The results demonstrate that full-rate SIPI pulses improve temporal-pitch sensitivity across F0s and particularly at low modulation depths where envelope-pitch cues are weak. The half-rate SIPI pulses did not circumvent the limitation and further increased variability across listeners. Further, no effect of the carrier rate was found. Thus, the SIPI approach appears to be a promising approach to enhance CI listeners' access to temporal-envelope pitch cues at pulse rates used clinically.

1.
Arora
,
K.
,
Dawson
,
P.
,
Dowell
,
R.
, and
Vandali
,
A.
(
2009
). “
Electrical stimulation rate effects on speech perception in cochlear implants
,”
Int. J. Audiol.
48
,
561
567
.
2.
Baumann
,
U.
, and
Nobbe
,
A.
(
2004
). “
Pitch ranking with deeply inserted electrode arrays
,”
Ear. Hear.
25
,
275
283
.
3.
Boulet
,
J.
,
White
,
M.
, and
Bruce
,
I. C.
(
2016
). “
Temporal considerations for stimulating spiral ganglion neurons with cochlear implants
,”
J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.
17
,
1
17
.
4.
Buechel
,
B. D.
,
Hancock
,
K. E.
,
Chung
,
Y.
, and
Delgutte
,
B.
(
2018
). “
Improved neural coding of ITD with bilateral cochlear implants by introducing short inter-pulse intervals
,”
J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.
19
,
681
702
.
5.
Carlyon
,
R. P.
,
Lynch
,
C.
, and
Deeks
,
J. M.
(
2010
). “
Effect of stimulus level and place of stimulation on temporal pitch perception by cochlear implant users
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
127
,
2997
3008
.
6.
Carlyon
,
R. P.
,
van Wieringen
,
A.
,
Long
,
C. J.
,
Deeks
,
J. M.
, and
Wouters
,
J.
(
2002
). “
Temporal pitch mechanisms in acoustic and electric hearing
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
112
,
621
633
.
7.
Chatterjee
,
M.
, and
Oberzut
,
C.
(
2011
). “
Detection and rate discrimination of amplitude modulation in electrical hearing
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
130
,
1567
1580
.
8.
Chen
,
J.
,
Yang
,
H.
,
Wu
,
X.
, and
Moore
,
B. C. J.
(
2018
). “
The effect of F0 contour on the intelligibility of speech in the presence of interfering sounds for Mandarin Chinese
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
143
,
864
877
.
9.
Churchill
,
T. H.
,
Kan
,
A.
,
Goupell
,
M. J.
, and
Litovsky
,
R. Y.
(
2014
). “
Spatial hearing benefits demonstrated with presentation of acoustic temporal fine structure cues in bilateral cochlear implant listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
136
,
1246
1256
.
10.
Cousineau
,
D.
(
2005
). “
Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method,” Tutor
.
Quant. Methods Psychol.
1
,
42
45
.
11.
Cutler
,
A.
,
Dahan
,
D.
, and
van Donselaar
,
W.
(
1997
). “
Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review
,”
Lang. Speech
40
,
141
201
.
12.
Darwin
,
C. J.
(
2005
). “
Pitch and auditory grouping
,” in
Pitch
, edited by
C. J.
Plack
,
R. R.
Fay
,
A. J.
Oxenham
, and
A. N.
Popper
(
Springer
,
New York
), pp.
278
305
.
13.
Dorman
,
M.
, and
Wilson
,
B.
(
2004
). “
The design and function of cochlear implants
,”
Am. Sci.
92
,
436
445
.
14.
Egger
,
K.
,
Majdak
,
P.
, and
Laback
,
B.
(
2017
). “
Binaural timing information in electric hearing at low rates: Effects of inaccurate encoding and loudness
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
141
,
3164
3174
.
15.
Francart
,
T.
,
Osses
,
A.
, and
Wouters
,
J.
(
2015
). “
Speech perception with F0mod, a cochlear implant pitch coding strategy
,”
Int. J. Audiol.
54
,
424
432
.
16.
Garofolo
,
J. S.
,
Lamel
,
L. F.
,
Fisher
,
W. M.
,
Fiscus
,
J. G.
,
Pallett
,
D. S.
,
Dahlgren
,
N. L.
, and
Zue
,
V.
(
1993
).
TIMIT Acoustic Phonetic Continuous Speech Corpus
(
Linguistic Data Consortium
,
Philadelphia, PA, USA
).
17.
Geurts
,
L.
, and
Wouters
,
J.
(
2001
). “
Coding of the fundamental frequency in continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
,
713
726
.
18.
Green
,
T.
,
Faulkner
,
A.
, and
Rosen
,
S.
(
2004
). “
Enhancing temporal cues to voice pitch in continuous interleaved sampling cochlear implants
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
116
,
2298
2310
.
19.
Green
,
T.
,
Faulkner
,
A.
, and
Rosen
,
S.
(
2012
). “
Variations in carrier pulse rate and the perception of amplitude modulation in cochlear implant users
,”
Ear. Hear.
33
,
221
230
.
20.
Green
,
T.
,
Faulkner
,
A.
,
Rosen
,
S.
, and
Macherey
,
O.
(
2005
). “
Enhancement of temporal periodicity cues in cochlear implants: Effects on prosodic perception and vowel identification
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
118
,
375
385
.
21.
Hancock
,
K. E.
,
Chung
,
Y.
, and
Delgutte
,
B.
(
2012
). “
Neural ITD coding with bilateral cochlear implants: Effect of binaurally coherent jitter
,”
J. Neurophysiol.
108
,
714
728
.
22.
Hancock
,
K. E.
,
Chung
,
Y.
,
McKinney
,
M. F.
, and
Delgutte
,
B.
(
2017
). “
Temporal envelope coding by inferior colliculus neurons with cochlear implant stimulation
,”
J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.
18
,
771
788
.
23.
Houtsma
,
A. J. M.
(
1995
). “
Pitch Perception
,” in
Hearing
, edited by
B. C. J.
Moore
(
Academic Press
,
London, UK)
, pp.
267
295
.
24.
Hu
,
H.
,
Ewert
,
S. D.
,
McAlpine
,
D.
, and
Dietz
,
M.
(
2017
). “
Differences in the temporal course of interaural time difference sensitivity between acoustic and electric hearing in amplitude modulated stimuli
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
141
,
1862
1873
.
25.
Ihlefeld
,
A.
,
Carlyon
,
R. P.
,
Kan
,
A.
,
Churchill
,
T. H.
, and
Litovsky
,
R. Y.
(
2015
). “
Limitations on monaural and binaural temporal processing in bilateral cochlear implant listeners
,”
J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.
16
,
641
652
.
26.
Jesteadt
,
W.
(
1980
). “
An adaptive procedure for subjective judgments
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
28
,
85
88
.
27.
Kalathottukaren
,
R. T.
,
Purdy
,
S. C.
, and
Ballard
,
E.
(
2015
). “
Prosody perception and musical pitch discrimination in adults using cochlear implants
,”
Int. J. Audiol.
54
,
444
452
.
28.
Kirby
,
A. E.
, and
Middlebrooks
,
J. C.
(
2010
). “
Auditory temporal acuity probed with cochlear implant stimulation and cortical recording
,”
J. Neurophysiol.
103
,
531
542
.
29.
Klein
,
S. A.
(
2001
). “
Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: A commentary
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
63
,
1421
1455
.
30.
Kohler
,
K. J.
(
1996
). “
Labelled data bank of spoken standard German: The Kiel corpus of read/spontaneous speech
,” in
Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, ICSLP ';96
, October 3–6, Philadelphia, PA, pp.
1938
1941
.
31.
Kong
,
Y.-Y.
, and
Carlyon
,
R. P.
(
2010
). “
Temporal pitch perception at high rates in cochlear implants
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
127
,
3114
3123
.
32.
Kong
,
Y.-Y.
,
Deeks
,
J. M.
,
Axon
,
P. R.
, and
Carlyon
,
R. P.
(
2009
). “
Limits of temporal pitch in cochlear implants
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
125
,
1649
1657
.
33.
Kreft
,
H. A.
,
Oxenham
,
A. J.
, and
Nelson
,
D. A.
(
2010
). “
Modulation rate discrimination using half-wave rectified and sinusoidally amplitude modulated stimuli in cochlear-implant users
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
127
,
656
659
.
34.
Laback
,
B.
, and
Majdak
,
P.
(
2008
). “
Binaural jitter improves interaural time-difference sensitivity of cochlear implantees at high pulse rates
,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
105
,
814
817
.
35.
Laback
,
B.
,
Majdak
,
P.
, and
Baumgartner
,
W.-D.
(
2007
). “
Lateralization discrimination of interaural time delays in four-pulse sequences in electric and acoustic hearing
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
121
,
2182
2191
.
36.
Laback
,
B.
,
Pok
,
S.-M.
,
Baumgartner
,
W.-D.
,
Deutsch
,
W. A.
, and
Schmid
,
K.
(
2004
). “
Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors
,”
Ear. Hear.
25
,
488
500
.
37.
Laback
,
B.
,
Zimmermann
,
I.
,
Majdak
,
P.
,
Baumgartner
,
W.-D.
, and
Pok
,
S.-M.
(
2011
). “
Effects of envelope shape on interaural envelope delay sensitivity in acoustic and electric hearing
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
130
,
1515
1529
.
38.
Landsberger
,
D. M.
(
2008
). “
Effects of modulation wave shape on modulation frequency discrimination with electrical hearing
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
124
,
EL21
EL27
.
39.
Laneau
,
J.
,
Wouters
,
J.
, and
Moonen
,
M.
(
2006
). “
Improved music perception with explicit pitch coding in cochlear implants
,”
Audiol. Neurootol.
11
,
38
52
.
40.
Loizou
,
P. C.
,
Poroy
,
O.
, and
Dorman
,
M.
(
2000
). “
The effect of parametric variations of cochlear implant processors on speech understanding
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
108
,
790
802
.
41.
McKay
,
C. M.
, and
Henshall
,
K. R.
(
2010
). “
Amplitude modulation and loudness in cochlear implantees
,”
J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.
11
,
101
111
.
42.
McKay
,
C. M.
,
McDermott
,
H. J.
, and
Clark
,
G. M.
(
1994
). “
Pitch percepts associated with amplitude-modulated current pulse trains in cochlear implantees
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
96
,
2664
2673
.
43.
McKay
,
C. M.
,
McDermott
,
H. J.
, and
Clark
,
G. M.
(
1995
). “
Pitch matching of amplitude-modulated current pulse trains by cochlear implantees: The effect of modulation depth
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
97
,
1777
1785
.
44.
McKay
,
C. M.
,
Remine
,
M. D.
, and
McDermott
,
H. J.
(
2001
). “
Loudness summation for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea: Effects of rate, electrode separation, level, and mode of stimulation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
110
,
1514
1524
.
45.
Mehta
,
A. H.
, and
Oxenham
,
A. J.
(
2017
). “
Vocoder simulations explain complex pitch perception limitations experienced by cochlear implant users
,”
J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.
18
,
789
802
.
46.
Milczynski
,
M.
,
Chang
,
J. E.
,
Wouters
,
J.
, and
van Wieringen
,
A.
(
2012
). “
Perception of Mandarin Chinese with cochlear implants using enhanced temporal pitch cues
,”
Hear. Res.
285
,
1
12
.
47.
Milczynski
,
M.
,
Wouters
,
J.
, and
van Wieringen
,
A.
(
2009
). “
Improved fundamental frequency coding in cochlear implant signal processing
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
125
,
2260
2271
.
48.
Miller
,
S. E.
,
Schlauch
,
R. S.
, and
Watson
,
P. J.
(
2010
). “
The effects of fundamental frequency contour manipulations on speech intelligibility in background noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
128
,
435
443
.
49.
Monaghan
,
J. J. M.
, and
Seeber
,
B. U.
(
2016
). “
A method to enhance the use of interaural time differences for cochlear implants in reverberant environments
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
140
,
1116
1129
.
50.
Moore
,
B. C. J.
, and
Carlyon
,
R. P.
(
2005
). “
Perception of pitch by people with cochlear hearing loss and by cochlear implant users,” in Pitch
, edited by
C. J.
Plack
,
R. R.
Fay
,
A. J.
Oxenham
, and
A. N.
Popper
(
Springer
,
New York)
, pp.
234
277
.
51.
Morey
,
R. D.
(
2008
). “
Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005)
,”
Tutor. Quant. Methods Psychol.
4
,
61
64
.
52.
Oxenham
,
A. J.
(
2012
). “
Pitch perception
,”
J. Neurosci.
32
,
13335
13338
.
53.
Oxenham
,
A. J.
,
Micheyl
,
C.
,
Keebler
,
M. V.
,
Loper
,
A.
, and
Santurette
,
S.
(
2011
). “
Pitch perception beyond the traditional existence region of pitch
,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
108
,
7629
7634
.
54.
Pépiot
,
E.
(
2014
). “
Male and female speech: A study of mean F0, F0 range, phonation type and speech rate in Parisian French and American English speakers
,” in
Speech Prosody 7
, edited by
N.
Campbell
,
D.
Gibbon
, and
D.
Hirst
(
Trinity College
,
Dublin, Ireland
), pp.
305
309
.
55.
Peterson
,
G. E.
, and
Barney
,
H. L.
(
1952
). “
Control methods used in a study of the vowels
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
24
,
175
184
.
56.
Pieper
,
S. H.
, and
Bahmer
,
A.
(
2019
). “
Rate pitch discrimination in cochlear implant users with the use of double pulses and different interpulse intervals
,”
Cochlear Implants Int.
20
,
312
323
.
57.
Riss
,
D.
,
Hamzavi
,
J.-S.
,
Blineder
,
M.
,
Honeder
,
C.
,
Ehrenreich
,
I.
,
Kaider
,
A.
,
Baumgartner
,
W.-D.
,
Gstoettner
,
W.
, and
Arnoldner
,
C.
(
2014
). “
FS4, FS4-p, and FSP: A 4-month crossover study of 3 fine structure sound-coding strategies
,”
Ear. Hear.
35
,
e272
e281
.
58.
Sayles
,
M.
, and
Winter
,
I. M.
(
2008
). “
Reverberation challenges the temporal representation of the pitch of complex sounds
,”
Neuron
58
,
789
801
.
59.
Schouten
,
J. F.
(
1940
). “
The residue and the mechanism of hearing
,”
Proc. Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie Wetenschappen
43
,
991
999
.
60.
Shannon
,
R. V.
(
1983
). “
Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics
,”
Hear. Res.
11
,
157
189
.
61.
Smith
,
Z. M.
,
Kan
,
A.
,
Jones
,
H. G.
,
Buhr-Lawler
,
M.
,
Godar
,
S. P.
, and
Litovsky
,
R. Y.
(
2014
). “
Hearing better with interaural time differences and bilateral cochlear implants
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
135
,
2190
2191
.
62.
Srinivasan
,
S.
,
Laback
,
B.
, and
Majdak
,
P.
(
2017
). “
Improving interaural time difference sensitivity using short interpulse intervals with vowel-like stimuli in bilateral cochlear implants
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
141
,
3973
3974
.
63.
Srinivasan
,
S.
,
Laback
,
B.
,
Majdak
,
P.
, and
Arnoldner
,
C.
(
2020
). “
Improving interaural time difference sensitivity using short inter-pulse intervals with amplitude-modulated pulse trains in bilateral cochlear implants
,”
J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.
64.
Srinivasan
,
S.
,
Laback
,
B.
,
Majdak
,
P.
, and
Delgutte
,
B.
(
2018
). “
Introducing short interpulse intervals in high-rate pulse trains enhances binaural timing sensitivity in electric hearing
,”
J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.
19
,
301
315
.
65.
Stahl
,
P.
,
Macherey
,
O.
,
Meunier
,
S.
, and
Roman
,
S.
(
2016
). “
Rate discrimination at low pulse rates in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners: Influence of intracochlear stimulation site
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
139
,
1578
1591
.
66.
Stupak
,
N.
,
Padilla
,
M.
,
Morse
,
R. P.
, and
Landsberger
,
D. M.
(
2018
). “
Perceptual differences between low-frequency analog and pulsatile stimulation as shown by single- and multidimensional scaling
,”
Trends Hear.
22
,
1
21
.
67.
Thakkar
,
T.
,
Kan
,
A.
,
Jones
,
H. G.
, and
Litovsky
,
R. Y.
(
2018
). “
Mixed stimulation rates to improve sensitivity of interaural timing differences in bilateral cochlear implant listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
143
,
1428
1440
.
68.
Titze
,
I. R.
(
1989
). “
Physiologic and acoustic differences between male and female voices
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
85
,
1699
1707
.
69.
Townshend
,
B.
,
Cotter
,
N.
,
Van Compernolle
,
D.
, and
White
,
R. L.
(
1987
). “
Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
82
,
106
115
.
70.
Vandali
,
A. E.
,
Sucher
,
C.
,
Tsang
,
D. J.
,
McKay
,
C. M.
,
Chew
,
J. W. D.
, and
McDermott
,
H. J.
(
2005
). “
Pitch ranking ability of cochlear implant recipients: A comparison of sound-processing strategies
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
117
,
3126
3138
.
71.
Vandali
,
A.
,
Sly
,
D.
,
Cowan
,
R.
, and
van Hoesel
,
R.
(
2013
). “
Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees
,”
Hear. Res.
302
,
32
49
.
72.
Vandali
,
A. E.
, and
van Hoesel
,
R. J. M.
(
2011
). “
Development of a temporal fundamental frequency coding strategy for cochlear implants
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
129
,
4023
4036
.
73.
Vandali
,
A. E.
, and
van Hoesel
,
R. J. M.
(
2012
). “
Enhancement of temporal cues to pitch in cochlear implants: Effects on pitch ranking
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
132
,
392
402
.
74.
van Hoesel
,
R. J. M.
,
Jones
,
G. L.
, and
Litovsky
,
R. Y.
(
2009
). “
Interaural time-delay sensitivity in bilateral cochlear implant users: Effects of pulse rate, modulation rate, and place of stimulation
,”
J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.
10
,
557
567
.
75.
van Hoesel
,
R. J. M.
, and
Tyler
,
R. S.
(
2003
). “
Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
113
,
1617
1630
.
76.
Vongphoe
,
M.
, and
Zeng
,
F.-G.
(
2005
). “
Speaker recognition with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
118
,
1055
1061
.
77.
Williges
,
B.
,
Jürgens
,
T.
,
Hu
,
H.
, and
Dietz
,
M.
(
2018
). “
Coherent coding of enhanced interaural cues improves sound localization in noise with bilateral cochlear implants
,”
Trends Hear.
22
,
1
18
.
78.
Wilson
,
B. S.
(
2006
). “
Speech processing strategies
,” in
Cochlear Implants: A Practical Guide
, edited by
H.
Cooper
and
L. C.
Craddock
(
Whurr
,
London, UK
), 2nd ed., pp.
21
69
.
79.
Wilson
,
B. S.
, and
Dorman
,
M. F.
(
2008
). “
Cochlear implants: A remarkable past and a brilliant future
,”
Hear. Res.
242
,
3
21
.
80.
Wilson
,
B. S.
,
Finley
,
C. C.
,
Lawson
,
D. T.
,
Wolford
,
R. D.
,
Eddington
,
D. K.
, and
Rabinowitz
,
W. M.
(
1991
). “
Better speech recognition with cochlear implants
,”
Nature
352
,
236
238
.
81.
Wilson
,
B. S.
,
Finley
,
C. C.
,
Lawson
,
D. T.
, and
Zerbi
,
M.
(
1997
). “
Temporal representations with cochlear implants
,”
Am. J. Otol.
18
,
30
34
.
82.
Wouters
,
J.
,
McDermott
,
H. J.
, and
Francart
,
T.
(
2015
). “
Sound coding in cochlear implants: From electric pulses to hearing
,”
IEEE Signal Process. Mag.
32
,
67
80
.
83.
Xu
,
L.
, and
Pfingst
,
B. E.
(
2003
). “
Relative importance of temporal envelope and fine structure in lexical-tone perception (L)
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
114
,
3024
3027
.
84.
Zierhofer
,
C. M.
(
2003
). “
Electrical nerve stimulation based on channel specific sampling sequences
,” U.S. patent No. 6,594,525.
You do not currently have access to this content.