Southern U.S. speech has been the focus of much sociophonetic work. In terms of vowel patterns, Southern speech is often characterized by the Southern Vowel Shift (SVS, involving shifts in /e/, /ɛ/, and /aɪ/), back vowel fronting, and changes in glide dynamics. The SVS, in particular, is said to play a primary role in distinguishing the South as a unique dialect region. However, there have been few investigations of the role of various vowel quality differences in perceptions of Southern accent, particularly across the vowel space beyond /e/, /ɛ/, and /aɪ/, or that ask whether any aggregate speaker-level acoustic measures align with listeners' perceptions, despite some suggestions in the literature to this effect. The current study examines what acoustic cues contribute to non-Southern listeners' evaluations of words spoken by Southerners as sounding more or less Southern accented, looking at a range of vowels from across the vowel space. Results indicate that listeners rate the speakers' productions of /u/ and /ɔ/ as most Southern and that vowel dynamics and speaker-level measures were the acoustic factors most predictive of Southernness ratings. These results together call for further work examining vowel dynamics and a more complete set of vowel categories in perception studies of Southern speech.

1.
Albritten
,
R.
(
2011
). “
Sounding Southern: Phonetic features and dialect perceptions
,” Ph.D. thesis, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C.
2.
Baayen
,
H.
(
2008
).
Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics using R
, 1st ed. (
Cambridge University Press
,
New York
).
3.
Boersma
,
P.
, and
Weenink
,
D.
(
2017
). “
Praat: Doing phonetics by computer, version 6.0.28 [computer program]
,” http://www.praat.org/ (Last viewed 1/10/2020).
4.
Clopper
,
C. G.
, and
Pisoni
,
D. B.
(
2004
). “
Some acoustic cues for the perceptual categorization of American English regional dialects
,”
J. Phon.
32
,
111
140
.
5.
Clopper
,
C. G.
,
Pisoni
,
D. B.
, and
de Jong
,
K. J.
(
2005
). “
Acoustic characteristics of the vowel systems of six regional varieties of American English
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
118
,
1661
1676
.
6.
Clopper
,
C. G.
, and
Smiljanic
,
R.
(
2011
). “
Effects of gender and regional dialect on prosodic patterns in American English
,”
J. Phon.
39
,
237
245
.
7.
Fabricius
,
A. H.
,
Watt
,
D.
, and
Johnson
,
D. E.
(
2009
). “
A comparison of three speaker-intrinsic vowel formant frequency normalization algorithms for sociophonetics
,”
Lang. Var. Change
21
,
413
435
.
8.
Farrington
,
C.
,
Kendall
,
T.
, and
Fridland
,
V.
(
2018
). “
Vowel dynamics in the Southern vowel shift
,”
Am. Speech
93
,
186
222
.
9.
Feagin
,
C.
(
1986
). “
More evidence for major vowel change in the South
,” in
Diversity and Diachrony
, edited by
D.
Sankoff
(
John Benjamins
,
Amsterdam
), pp.
83
95
.
10.
Feagin
,
C.
(
1987
). “
A closer look at the Southern drawl: Variation taken to extremes
,” in
Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation
, October 17–19, Stanford, CA, pp.
137
150
.
11.
Feagin
,
C.
(
2000
). “
Sound change in the South
,”
Am. Speech
75
,
342
344
.
12.
Fox
,
R. A.
, and
Jacewicz
,
E.
(
2009
). “
Cross-dialectal variation in formant dynamics of American English vowels
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
126
,
2603
2618
.
13.
Fridland
,
V.
(
2000
). “
The Southern Shift in Memphis, Tennessee
,”
Lang. Var. Change
11
,
267
285
.
14.
Fridland
,
V.
(
2003
). “
 ‘Tie, tied and tight’: The expansion of /aɪ/ monophthongization in African-American and European-American speech in Memphis, Tennessee
,”
J. Socioling.
7
,
279
298
.
15.
Fridland
,
V.
(
2008
). “
Regional differences in perceiving vowel tokens on Southerness, education, and pleasantness ratings
,”
Lang. Var. Change
20
,
67
83
.
16.
Fridland
,
V.
(
2012
). “
Rebel vowels: How vowel shift patterns are reshaping speech in the modern south
,”
Lang. Ling. Compass
6
,
183
192
.
17.
Fridland
,
V.
, and
Bartlett
,
K.
(
2006
). “
The social and linguistic conditioning of back vowel fronting across ethnic groups in Memphis, Tennessee
,”
Eng. Lang. Linguist.
10
,
1
22
.
18.
Fridland
,
V.
,
Bartlett
,
K.
, and
Kreuz
,
R.
(
2004
). “
Do you hear what I hear? Experimental measurement of the perceptual salience of acoustically manipulated vowel variants by Southern speakers in Memphis, TN
,”
Lang. Var. Change
16
,
1
16
.
19.
Fridland
,
V.
, and
Kendall
,
T.
(
2012
). “
Exploring the relationship between production and perception in the mid front vowels of US English
,”
Lingua
122
,
779
793
.
20.
Fridland
,
V.
, and
Kendall
,
T.
(
2015
). “
Within-region diversity in the Southern vowel shift: Production and perception
,” in
Proceedings of the 18th International Congress on Phonetic Science
, August 10–14, Glasgow, UK.
21.
Fridland
,
V.
,
Kendall
,
T.
, and
Farrington
,
C.
(
2014
). “
Durational and spectral differences in American English vowels: Dialect variation within and across regions
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
136
,
341
349
.
22.
Irons
,
T. L.
(
2007
). “
On the Southern shift in Appalachian English
,”
Univ. Pennsylvania Work. Pap. Linguist.
13
,
121
134
.
23.
Jacewicz
,
E.
,
Fox
,
R. A.
, and
Lyle
,
S.
(
2010
). “
Variation in stop consonant voicing in two regional varieties of American English
,”
J. Int. Phon. Ass.
39
,
313
334
.
24.
Jacewicz
,
E.
,
Fox
,
R. A.
, and
Salmons
,
J.
(
2007
). “
Vowel duration in three American English dialects
,”
Am. Speech
82
,
367
385
.
25.
Kendall
,
T.
, and
Fridland
,
V.
(
2012
). “
Variation in perception and production of mid front vowels in the US Southern vowel shift
,”
J. Phon.
40
,
289
306
.
26.
Kendall
,
T.
, and
Fridland
,
V.
(
2017
). “
Regional relationships among the low vowels of U.S. English: Evidence from production and perception
,”
Lang. Var. Change
29
,
245
271
.
27.
Koops
,
C.
(
2010
). “
/u/-Fronting is not monolithic: Two types of fronted /u/ in Houston Anglos
,”
Univ. Pennsylvania Work. Pap. Linguist.
16
,
111
122
.
28.
Koops
,
C.
(
2014
). “
Iconization and the timing of Southern vowels: A case study of / æ / iconization and the timing of Southern vowels: A case study of / æ
/,”
Univ. Pennsylvania Work. Pap. Linguist.
20
,
81
90
.
29.
Kuznetsova
,
A.
,
Brockhoff
,
P. B.
, and
Christensen
,
R. H. B.
(
2017
). “
lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models
,”
J. Stat. Softw.
82
(
13
),
1
26
.
30.
Labov
,
W.
(
1991
). “
The three dialects of English
,” in
New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English
, edited by
P.
Eckert
(
Academic Press
,
San Diego, CA
), pp.
1
44
.
31.
Labov
,
W.
,
Ash
,
S.
, and
Boberg
,
C.
(
2006
).
The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology and Sound Change
(
De Gruyter
,
Berlin
).
32.
Majors
,
T.
(
2005
). “
Low back vowel merger in Missouri speech: Acoustic description and explanation
,”
Am. Speech
80
,
165
179
.
33.
McAuliffe
,
M.
,
Socolof
,
M.
,
Mihuc
,
S.
,
Wagner
,
M.
, and
Sonderegger
,
M.
(
2017
). “
Montreal Forced Aligner: Trainable text-speech alignment using Kaldi
,” in
Proceedings of Interspeech
, August 20–24, Stockholm, Sweden.
34.
Nakagawa
,
S.
, and
Schielzeth
,
H.
(
2013
). “
A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models
,”
Methods Ecol. Evol.
4
(
2
),
133
142
.
35.
Nearey
,
T. M.
, and
Assmann
,
P. F.
(
1986
). “
Modeling the role of inherent spectral change in vowel identification
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
80
,
1297
1308
.
36.
Nycz
,
J.
, and
Hall-Lew
,
L.
(
2013
). “
Best practices in measuring vowel merger
,”
Proc. Mtgs. Acoust.
20
,
060008
.
37.
O'Brien
,
R. M.
(
2007
). “
A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors
,”
Qual. Quant.
41
(
5
),
673
690
.
38.
Plichta
,
B.
, and
Preston
,
D.
(
2005
). “
The /ay/s have it: The perception of /ay/ as a North–South stereotype in United States English
,”
Acta Linguist. Hafniensia
37
,
107
130
.
39.
Preston
,
D. R.
(
1993
). “
Folk dialectology
,” in American Dialect Research: Celebrating the 100th Anniversary of the American Dialect Society, 1889–1989 (
John Benjamins Publishing
,
Philadelphia
), pp.
333
378
.
40.
Preston
,
D. R.
(
2015
). “
The South: Still different
,” in
New Perspectives on Language Variety in the South: Historical and Contemporary Approaches
(
University of Alabama Press
,
Tuscaloosa, AL
), pp.
311
326
.
41.
Reed
,
P. E.
(
2016
). “
Sounding Appalachian: /ai/ monophthongization, rising pitch accents, and rootedness
,” Ph.D. thesis,
University of South Carolina, Columbia
, South Carolina.
42.
Sledd
,
J. H.
(
1966
). “
Breaking, umlaut, and the Southern drawl
,”
Language (Baltimore)
42
,
18
41
.
43.
Thomas
,
E. R.
(
2001
).
An Acoustic Analysis of Vowel Variation in New World English
(
Duke University Press Books
,
Durham, NC
), pp.
15
58
.
44.
Thomas
,
E. R.
(
2003
). “
Secrets revealed by Southern vowel shifting
,”
Am. Speech
78
,
150
170
.
45.
Torbert
,
B.
(
2004
). “
Southern vowels and the construction of social salience
,” Ph.D. thesis,
Duke University
,
Durham, NC
.
46.
Wetzell
,
W. B.
(
2000
). “
Rhythm, dialects and the Southern drawl
,” Master's thesis,
North Carolina State University
, Raleigh, North Carolina.
47.
Wolfram
,
W.
,
Hazen
,
K.
, and
Schilling-Estes
,
N.
(
1999
). “
The shifting status of outer banks /aɪ/
,”
Publ. Am. Dialect Soc.
81
,
104
119
.

Supplementary Material

You do not currently have access to this content.