While previous research has primarily concerned the dialectal influence on speakers' production of oral-nasal balance, quantitatively represented by nasalance, information on cross-dialectal variation in nasality perception is limited. This study investigated the effects of speakers'/listeners' dialectal background on oral-nasal balance characteristics estimated by nasalance, as well as nasality perception measured by direct magnitude estimation with modulus. Represented by two geographically distinct regions, Texas South and Midland dialects were of special interest given that the two dialects lie at opposite ends of normal nasalance variation [Awan, Bressmann, Poburka, Roy, Sharp, and Watts. (2015). J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 58, 69–77]. Mean nasalance of various speech stimuli and direct magnitude estimation ratings on synthesized vowel stimuli with varying degrees of simulated nasalization were obtained from 62 participants (31 Texas South, 31 Midland). The results revealed that the two dialectal groups significantly differed in nasalance scores and nasality ratings, with Texas South exhibiting higher nasalance for standardized passage readings and assigning higher nasality ratings on the synthetic auditory stimuli than Midland. These findings indicate that, in addition to production variations of oral-nasal balance characteristics, perceptual variations of nasality exist at a dialectal level.

1.
Abramson
,
A. S.
,
Nye
,
P. W.
,
Henderson
,
J. B.
, and
Marshall
,
C. W.
(
1998
). “
Vowel height and the perception of consonantal nasality
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
70
,
329
339
.
2.
Awan
,
S. N.
,
Bressmann
,
T.
,
Poburka
,
B.
,
Roy
,
N.
,
Sharp
,
H.
, and
Watts
,
C.
(
2015
). “
Dialectal effects on nasalance: A multicenter, cross-continental study
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
58
,
69
77
.
3.
Awan
,
S. N.
,
Omlor
,
K.
, and
Watts
,
C. R.
(
2011
). “
Effects of computer system and vowel loading on measures of nasalance
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
54
,
1284
1294
.
4.
Bae
,
Y.
(
2018
). “
Nasalization amplitude-timing characteristics of speakers with and without cleft palate
,”
Cleft Palate Craniofac. J.
55
,
45
56
.
5.
Bae
,
Y.
,
Kuehn
,
D. P.
,
Conway
,
C. A.
, and
Sutton
,
B. P.
(
2011
). “
Real-time magnetic resonance imaging of velopharyngeal activities with simultaneous speech recordings
,”
Cleft Palate Craniofac. J.
48
,
695
707
.
6.
Bae
,
Y.
,
Kuehn
,
D. P.
, and
Ha
,
S.
(
2007
). “
Validity of the nasometer measuring the temporal characteristics of nasalization
,”
Cleft Palate Craniofac. J.
44
,
506
517
.
7.
Beddor
,
P. S.
,
Coetzee
,
A. W.
,
Styler
,
W.
,
McGowan
,
K. B.
, and
Boland
,
J. E.
(
2018
). “
The time course of individuals' perception of coarticulatory information is linked to their production: Implications for sound change
,”
Language
94
,
931
968
.
8.
Brancamp
,
T. U.
,
Lewis
,
K. E.
, and
Watterson
,
T.
(
2010
). “
The relationship between nasalance scores and nasality ratings obtained with equal appearing interval and direct magnitude estimation scaling methods
,”
Cleft Palate Craniofac. J.
47
,
631
637
.
9.
Brunelle
,
M.
(
2009
). “
Tone perception in Northern and Southern Vietnamese
,”
J. Phon.
37
,
79
96
.
10.
Bunnell
,
H. T.
(
2015
).
Low Level Synthesis Interface
(software) (
University of Delaware
,
Newark, DE
).
11.
Bunton
,
K.
(
2015
). “
Effects of nasal port area on perception of nasality and measures of nasalance based on computational modeling
,”
Cleft Palate Craniofac. J.
52
,
110
114
.
12.
Bunton
,
K.
, and
Story
,
B. H.
(
2012
). “
The relation of nasality and nasalance to nasal port area based on a computational model
,”
Cleft Palate Craniofac. J.
49
,
741
749
.
13.
Casserly
,
E. D.
, and
Pisoni
,
D. B.
(
2010
). “
Speech perception and production
,”
Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci.
1
,
629
647
.
14.
Clopper
,
C. G.
, and
Pisoni
,
D. B.
(
2004
). “
Some acoustic cues for the perceptual categorization of American English regional dialects
,”
J. Phon.
32
,
111
140
.
15.
Clopper
,
C. G.
, and
Pisoni
,
D. B.
(
2006
). “
The Nationwide Speech Project: A new corpus of American English dialects
,”
Speech Commun.
48
,
633
644
.
16.
Clopper
,
C. G.
,
Pisoni
,
D. B.
, and
de Jong
,
K.
(
2005
). “
Acoustic characteristics of the vowel systems of six regional varieties of American English
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
118
,
1661
1676
.
17.
Drager
,
K.
(
2010
). “
Sociophonetic variation in speech perception
,”
Lang. Linguist. Compass
4
,
473
480
.
18.
Drager
,
K.
(
2011
). “
Speaker age and vowel perception
,”
Lang. Speech
54
,
99
121
.
19.
Evans
,
B. G.
, and
Iverson
,
P.
(
2007
). “
Plasticity in vowel perception and production: A study of accent change in young adults
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
121
,
3814
3826
.
20.
Fox
,
R. A.
,
Flege
,
J. E.
, and
Munro
,
M. J.
(
1995
). “
The perception of English and Spanish vowels by native English and Spanish listeners: A Multidimensional scaling analysis
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
97
,
2540
2551
.
21.
Fox
,
R. A.
, and
Jacewicz
,
E.
(
2009
). “
Cross-dialectal variation in formant dynamics of American English vowels
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
126
,
2603
2618
.
22.
Fridland
,
V.
, and
Kendall
,
T.
(
2012
). “
Exploring the relationship between production and perception in the mid front vowels of U.S. English
,”
Lingua
122
,
779
793
.
23.
Gandour
,
J. T.
(
1983
). “
Tone perception in far eastern languages
,”
J. Phon.
11
,
149
175
.
24.
Gideon
,
R. A.
, and
Hollister
,
R. A.
(
1987
). “
A rank correlation coefficient resistant to outliers
,”
J. Am. Stat. Assoc.
82
,
656
666
.
25.
Hagiwara
,
R.
(
1997
). “
Dialect variation and formant frequency: The American English vowels revisited
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
102
,
655
658
.
26.
Hartley
,
L. C.
, and
Preston
,
D. R.
(
1999
). “
The names of US English: Valley Girl, cowboy, yankee, normal, nasal and ignorant
,” in
Standard English: The Widening Debate
, edited by
T.
Bex
and
R. J.
Watts
(
Routledge
,
London
).
27.
Hawkins
,
S.
, and
Stevens
,
K. N.
(
1985
). “
Acoustic and perceptual correlates of the non-nasal—Nasal distinction for vowels
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
77
,
1560
1575
.
28.
Hawks
,
J. W.
(
1994
). “
Difference limens for formant patterns of vowel sounds
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
95
,
1074
1084
.
29.
Hinkle
,
D. E.
,
Wiersma
,
W.
, and
Jurs
,
S. G.
(
2003
).
Applied Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
(
Houghton Mifflin
,
Boston)
.
30.
House
,
A. S.
, and
Stevens
,
K. N.
(
1956
). “
Analog studies of the nasalization of vowels
,”
J. Speech Hear. Disord.
21
,
218
232
.
31.
Jacewicz
,
E.
, and
Fox
,
R. A.
(
2012
). “
The effects of cross-generational and cross-dialectal variation on vowel identification and classification
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
131
,
1413
1433
.
32.
Jacewicz
,
E.
, and
Fox
,
R. A.
(
2014
). “
The effects of indexical and phonetic variation on vowel perception in typically developing 9- to 12-year-old children
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
57
,
389
405
.
33.
Jacewicz
,
E.
,
Fox
,
R. A.
, and
Salmons
,
J.
(
2011
). “
Cross-generational vowel change in American English
,”
Lang. Var. Change
23
,
45
86
.
34.
Kirby
,
J.
(
2010
). “
Dialect experience in Vietnamese tone perception
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
127
,
3749
3757
.
35.
Kummer
,
A. W.
(
2005
).
The MacKay-Kummer SNAP Test-R: Simplified Nasometric Assessment Procedures
(
KayPENTAX™
,
Montvale, NJ
).
36.
Kummer
,
A. W.
(
2008
).
Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Anomalies: Effects on Speech and Resonance
(
Cengage Learning
,
Clifton Park, NY)
.
37.
Labov
,
W.
(
1998
). “
The three dialects of English
,” in
Handbook of Dialects and Language Variation
, edited by
M. D.
Linn
(
Academic Press
,
San Diego, CA
).
38.
Labov
,
W.
,
Ash
,
S.
, and
Boberg
,
C.
(
2006
).
The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology, and Sound Change
(
Mouton de Gruyter
,
New York
).
39.
Lee
,
A.
,
Brown
,
S.
, and
Gibbon
,
F. E.
(
2008
). “
Effect of listeners' linguistic background on perceptual judgements of hypernasality
,”
Int. J. Lang. Comm. Dis.
43
,
487
498
.
40.
Lewis
,
K. E.
,
Watterson
,
T.
, and
Quint
,
T.
(
2000
). “
The effect of vowels on nasalance scores
,”
Cleft Palate Craniofac. J.
37
,
584
589
.
41.
Lintz
,
L. B.
, and
Sherman
,
D.
(
1961
). “
Phonetic elements and perception of nasality
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
4
,
381
396
.
42.
MacKain
,
K. S.
,
Best
,
C. T.
, and
Strange
,
W.
(
1981
). “
Categorical perception of English /r/ and /l/ in Japanese bilinguals
,”
Appl. Psycholinguist.
2
,
369
390
.
43.
Mayo
,
R.
,
Floyd
,
L. A.
,
Warren
,
D. W.
,
Dalston
,
R. M.
, and
Mayo
,
C. M.
(
1996
). “
Nasalance and nasal area values: Cross-racial study
,”
Cleft Palate Craniofac. J.
33
,
143
149
.
44.
Munro
,
M. J.
,
Derwing
,
T. M.
, and
Flege
,
J. E.
(
1999
). “
Canadians in Alabama: A perceptual study of dialect acquisition in adults
,”
J. Phon.
27
,
385
403
.
45.
Schiavetti
,
N.
,
Martin
,
R. R.
,
Haroldson
,
S. K.
, and
Metz
,
D. E.
(
1994
). “
Psychophysical analysis of audiovisual judgments of speech naturalness in nonstutterers and stutterers
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
37
,
46
52
.
46.
Seaver
,
E. J.
,
Dalston
,
R. M.
,
Leeper
,
H. A.
, and
Adams
,
L. E.
(
1991
). “
A study of nasometric values for normal nasal resonance
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
34
,
715
722
.
47.
Shriberg
,
L. D.
, and
Kent
,
R. D.
(
2003
).
Clinical Phonetics
(
Pearson
,
New York)
.
48.
Stevens
,
K. N.
(
2000
).
Acoustic Phonetics
(
MIT Press
,
Cambridge, MA
).
49.
Styler
,
W.
(
2015
). “
On the acoustical and perceptual features of vowel nasality
,” Ph.D. thesis,
University of Colorado
,
Denver, CO
.
50.
Styler
,
W.
(
2017
). “
On the acoustical features of vowel nasality in English and French
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
142
,
2469
2482
.
51.
Svantesson
,
J.-O.
, and
House
,
D.
(
2006
). “
Tone production, tone perception and Kammu tonogenesis
,”
Phonology
23
,
309
443
.
52.
Thomas
,
E.
(
2002
). “
Sociophonetic applications of speech perception experiments
,”
Am. Speech
77
,
115
147
.
53.
Thorp
,
E. B.
,
Virnik
,
B. T.
, and
Stepp
,
C. E.
(
2013
). “
Comparison of nasal acceleration and nasalance across vowels
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
56
,
1476
1484
.
54.
Velik
,
K.
,
Bae
,
Y.
, and
Fox
,
R. A.
(
2019
). “
Effects of regional dialect on oral-nasal balance and nasality perception
,”
Clin. Linguist. Phon.
33
,
587
600
.
55.
Wayland
,
R. P.
, and
Guion
,
S. G.
(
2004
). “
Training English and Chinese listeners to perceive Thai tones: A preliminary report
,”
Lang. Learn.
54
,
681
712
.
56.
Watterson
,
T.
,
Lewis
,
K. E.
,
Murdock
,
T.
, and
Cordero
,
K. N.
(
2013
). “
Reliability and validity of nasality ratings between a monolingual and bilingual listener for speech samples from English-Spanish speaking children
,”
Folia Phoniatr. Logop.
65
,
91
97
.
57.
Weismer
,
G.
, and
Laures
,
J. S.
(
2002
). “
Direct magnitude estimates of speech intelligibility in dysarthria: Effects of a chosen standard
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
45
,
421
433
.
58.
Whitehill
,
T. L.
,
Lee
,
A. S.
, and
Chun
,
J. C.
(
2002
). “
Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of hypernasality
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
45
,
80
88
.
59.
Zellou
,
G.
(
2017
). “
Individual differences in the production of nasal coarticulation and perceptual compensation
,”
J. Phon.
61
,
13
29
.
60.
Zraick
,
R. I.
, and
Liss
,
J. M.
(
2000
). “
A comparison of equal-appearing interval scaling and direct magnitude estimation of nasal voice quality
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
43
,
979
988
.
You do not currently have access to this content.