Speech perception requires accommodation of a wide range of acoustic variability across talkers. A classic example is the perception of “sh” and “s” fricative sounds, which are categorized according to spectral details of the consonant itself, and also by the context of the voice producing it. Because women's and men's voices occupy different frequency ranges, a listener is required to make a corresponding adjustment of acoustic-phonetic category space for these phonemes when hearing different talkers. This pattern is commonplace in everyday speech communication, and yet might not be captured in accuracy scores for whole words, especially when word lists are spoken by a single talker. Phonetic accommodation for fricatives “s” and “sh” was measured in 20 cochlear implant (CI) users and in a variety of vocoder simulations, including those with noise carriers with and without peak picking, simulated spread of excitation, and pulsatile carriers. CI listeners showed strong phonetic accommodation as a group. Each vocoder produced phonetic accommodation except the 8-channel noise vocoder, despite its historically good match with CI users in word intelligibility. Phonetic accommodation is largely independent of linguistic factors and thus might offer information complementary to speech intelligibility tests which are partially affected by language processing.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
January 2020
January 22 2020
Accommodation of gender-related phonetic differences by listeners with cochlear implants and in a variety of vocoder simulations
Matthew B. Winn
Matthew B. Winn
a)
Department of Speech & Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota
, 164 Pillsbury Drive Southeast, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
a)
Electronic mail: mwinn@umn.edu
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 147, 174–190 (2020)
Article history
Received:
April 30 2019
Accepted:
December 13 2019
Citation
Matthew B. Winn; Accommodation of gender-related phonetic differences by listeners with cochlear implants and in a variety of vocoder simulations. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 January 2020; 147 (1): 174–190. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0000566
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Citing articles via
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Using soundscape simulation to evaluate compositions for a public space sound installation
Valérian Fraisse, Nadine Schütz, et al.
Source and propagation modelling scenarios for environmental impact assessment: Model verification
Michael A. Ainslie, Robert M. Laws, et al.