Multiple measures of vowel overlap have been proposed that use F1, F2, and duration to calculate the degree of overlap between vowel categories. The present study assesses four of these measures: the spectral overlap assessment metric [SOAM; Wassink (2006). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119(4), 2334–2350], the a posteriori probability (APP)-based metric [Morrison (2008). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123(1), 37–40], the vowel overlap analysis with convex hulls method [VOACH; Haynes and Taylor, (2014). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 136(2), 883–891], and the Pillai score as first used for vowel overlap by Hay, Warren, and Drager [(2006). J. Phonetics 34(4), 458–484]. Summaries of the measures are presented, and theoretical critiques of them are performed, concluding that the APP-based metric and Pillai score are theoretically preferable to SOAM and VOACH. The measures are empirically assessed using accuracy and precision criteria with Monte Carlo simulations. The Pillai score demonstrates the best overall performance in these tests. The potential applications of vowel overlap measures to research scenarios are discussed, including comparisons of vowel productions between different social groups, as well as acoustic investigations into vowel formant trajectories.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
January 2020
January 17 2020
A comparison of four vowel overlap measures
Matthew C. Kelley;
Matthew C. Kelley
a)
Department of Linguistics, University of Alberta
, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E7, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Benjamin V. Tucker
Benjamin V. Tucker
b)
Department of Linguistics, University of Alberta
, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E7, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
a)
Electronic mail: [email protected]. ORCID: 0000-0002-7218-5599.
b)
ORCID: 0000-0001-8965-7890.
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 147, 137–145 (2020)
Article history
Received:
September 16 2019
Accepted:
December 02 2019
Citation
Matthew C. Kelley, Benjamin V. Tucker; A comparison of four vowel overlap measures. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 January 2020; 147 (1): 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0000494
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Performance study of ray-based ocean acoustic tomography methods for estimating submesoscale variability in the upper ocean
Etienne Ollivier, Richard X. Touret, et al.
Related Content
An assessment of acoustic contrast between long and short vowels using convex hulls
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2014)
Sample size matters in calculating Pillai scores
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (January 2023)
Comment on “A geometric representation of spectral and temporal vowel features: Quantification of vowel overlap in three linguistic varieties” [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 2334–2350 (2006)]
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (January 2008)
Best practices in measuring vowel merger
Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. (August 2014)
A geometric representation of spectral and temporal vowel features: Quantification of vowel overlap in three linguistic varieties
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2006)