Polish is a geminating language with true lexical geminates that form minimal pairs with their singleton counterparts. What is more, Polish, unlike many other geminating languages, allows both single-articulated and rearticulated geminate realisations. In this study, durational properties of Polish geminates together with preceding and following vowels were analysed to compare Polish to other geminating languages. Fifty-four native speakers of Polish were recorded producing geminates and singletons in controlled carrier sentences during a reading task. The results revealed that the main durational cue to the geminate/singleton contrast was consonant duration with a geminate-to-singleton ratio (G/S) of 2.48. Vowels preceding or following geminates and singletons did not differ significantly in duration. Rearticulated geminates occurred 22% of the time and were not significantly longer or shorter than single-articulated geminates. The current results locate Polish among the languages with a medium-to-high G/S ratio and without vowel duration as a cue to a geminate/singleton contrast. Finally, the results allow for the discussion of the behaviour of Polish geminates relative to other languages as well as to indicate directions for further research into the phenomenon of geminate rearticulation.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 2019
December 05 2019
Durational properties of Polish geminate consonants
Arkadiusz Rojczyk;
Arkadiusz Rojczyk
a)
Acoustic-Phonetic Laboratory, University of Silesia in Katowice
, ul. Bankowa 12, 40-007 Katowice, Poland
Search for other works by this author on:
Andrzej Porzuczek
Andrzej Porzuczek
Acoustic-Phonetic Laboratory, University of Silesia in Katowice
, ul. Bankowa 12, 40-007 Katowice, Poland
Search for other works by this author on:
a)
Electronic mail: [email protected]
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 146, 4171–4182 (2019)
Article history
Received:
July 03 2019
Accepted:
October 30 2019
Citation
Arkadiusz Rojczyk, Andrzej Porzuczek; Durational properties of Polish geminate consonants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 December 2019; 146 (6): 4171–4182. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5134782
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
Day-to-day loudness assessments of indoor soundscapes: Exploring the impact of loudness indicators, person, and situation
Siegbert Versümer, Jochen Steffens, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Pseudo “geminates” in French
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)
Affricate gemination in the English of Polish speakers: A study in second language variability
J Acoust Soc Am (April 2003)
“Fake” gemination in suffixed words and compounds in English and German
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (July 2016)
Speech training systems using the lateral shape of the vocal tract and an F1−F2 diagram for hearing‐impaired children
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)