When hearing an ambiguous speech sound, listeners show a tendency to perceive it as a phoneme that would complete a real word, rather than completing a nonsense/fake word. For example, a sound that could be heard as either /b/ or /ɡ/ is perceived as /b/ when followed by _ack but perceived as /ɡ/ when followed by “_ap.” Because the target sound is acoustically identical across both environments, this effect demonstrates the influence of top-down lexical processing in speech perception. Degradations in the auditory signal were hypothesized to render speech stimuli more ambiguous, and therefore promote increased lexical bias. Stimuli included three speech continua that varied by spectral cues of varying speeds, including stop formant transitions (fast), fricative spectra (medium), and vowel formants (slow). Stimuli were presented to listeners with cochlear implants (CIs), and also to listeners with normal hearing with clear spectral quality, or with varying amounts of spectral degradation using a noise vocoder. Results indicated an increased lexical bias effect with degraded speech and for CI listeners, for whom the effect size was related to segment duration. This method can probe an individual's reliance on top-down processing even at the level of simple lexical/phonetic perception.

1.
Abbas
,
P.
,
Hughes
,
M.
,
Brown
,
C.
,
Miller
,
C.
, and
South
,
H.
(
2004
). “
Channel interaction in cochlear implant users evaluated using the electrically evoked compound action potential
,”
Audiol. Neurotol.
9
,
203
213
.
2.
ANSI S3.6-2004
. (
2004
). “
American National Standard Specification for audiometers
” (American National Standards Institute, New York).
3.
Bates
,
D.
,
Maechler
,
M.
,
Bolker
,
B.
, and
Walker
,
S.
(
2015
). “
Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4
,”
J. Stat. Software
67
(
1
),
1
48
.
4.
Bilger
,
R.
,
Nuetzel
,
J.
,
Rabinowitz
,
W.
, and
Rzeczkowski
,
C.
(
1984
). “
Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
27
(
March
),
32
48
.
5.
Bingabr
,
M.
,
Espinoza-Varas
,
B.
, and
Loizou
,
P.
(
2008
). “
Simulating the effect of spread of excitation in cochlear implants
,”
Hear. Res.
241
,
73
79
.
6.
Boersma
,
P.
, and
Weenink
,
D.
(
2016
). “
Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 6.0.21) [computer program]
,” http://www.praat.org/ (Last viewed November 6, 2019).
7.
Boothroyd
,
A.
, and
Nittrouer
,
S.
(
1988
). “
Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
84
(1),
101
114
.
8.
Borsky
,
S.
,
Tuller
,
B.
, and
Shapiro
,
L.
(
1998
). “ 
‘How to milk a coat:’ The effects of semantic and acoustic information on phoneme categorization
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
103
,
2670
2676
.
9.
Burton
,
M.
, and
Blumstein
,
S. E.
(
1995
). “
Lexical effects on phonetic categorization: The role of stimulus naturalness and stimulus quality
,”
J. Exp. Psych.: Hum. Percept. Perf.
21
,
1230
1235
.
10.
Chatterjee
,
M.
, and
Shannon
,
R.
(
1998
). “
Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode electrical stimulation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
103
,
2565
2572
.
11.
Connine
,
C.
(
1987
). “
Constraints on interactive processes in auditory word recognition: The role of sentence context
,”
J. Memory Lang.
16
,
527
538
.
12.
Deeks
,
J. M.
, and
Carlyon
,
R. P.
(
2004
). “
Simulations of cochlear implant hearing using filtered harmonic complexes: Implications for concurrent sound segregation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
115
,
1736
1746
.
13.
Desai
,
S.
,
Stickney
,
G.
, and
Zeng
,
F.
(
2008
). “
Auditory-visual speech perception in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am
123
(
1
),
428
440
.
14.
Donaldson
,
G. S.
,
Rogers
,
C. L.
,
Johnson
,
L. B.
, and
Oh
,
S. H.
(
2015
). “
Vowel identification by cochlear implant users: Contributions of duration cues and dynamic spectral cues
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
138
,
65
73
.
15.
Evers
,
V.
,
Reetz
,
H.
, and
Lahiri
,
A.
(
1998
). “
Crosslinguistic acoustic categorization of sibilants independent of phonological status
,”
J. Phonetics
26
,
345
370
.
16.
Farris-Trimble
,
A.
,
McMurray
,
B.
,
Cigrand
,
N.
, and
Tomblin
,
J. B.
(
2014
). “
The process of spoken word recognition in the face of signal degradation
,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.
40
(
1
),
308
327
.
17.
Fishman
,
K.
,
Shannon
,
R.
, and
Slattery
,
W.
(
1997
). “
Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
40
,
1201
1215
.
18.
Friesen
,
L.
,
Shannon
,
R.
,
Baskent
,
D.
, and
Wang
,
X.
(
2001
). “
Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
110
,
1150
1163
.
19.
Frisch
,
S.
(
2018
). (personal communication).
20.
Fu
,
Q.
, and
Shannon
,
R.
(
1998
). “
Effects of amplitude nonlinearity on phone recognition by cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
104
,
2570
2577
.
21.
Fu
,
Q.
, and
Shannon
,
R.
(
2000
). “
Effect of stimulation rate on phoneme recognition by nucleus-22 cochlear implant listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
107
,
589
597
.
22.
Ganong
,
W. F.
(
1980
). “
Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception
,”
J. Exp. Psych.: Hum. Percept. Perf.
6
(
1
),
110
115
.
23.
Gilbert
,
R.
,
Chandrasekaran
,
B.
, and
Smiljanic
,
R.
(
2014
). “
Recognition memory in noise for speech of varying intelligibility
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
135
,
389
399
.
24.
Glasberg
,
B. R.
, and
Moore
,
B. C.
(
1986
). “
Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
79
,
1020
1033
.
25.
Greenwood
,
D.
(
1990
). “
A cochlear frequency-position for several species—29 years later
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
87
(
6
),
2592
2605
.
26.
Grieco-Calub
,
T.
,
Saffran
,
J.
, and
Litovsky
,
R.
(
2009
). “
Spoken word recognition in toddlers who use cochlear implants
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
52
(
6
),
1390
1400
.
27.
Jenkins
,
J.
,
Strange
,
W.
, and
Edman
,
T.
(
1983
). “
Identification of vowels in ‘vowelless’ syllables
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
34
,
441
450
.
28.
Johnson
,
K.
(
2003
).
Acoustic & Auditory Phonetics
, 2nd ed. (
Blackwell
,
Malden, MA
).
29.
Lisker
,
L.
, and
Abramson
,
A.
(
1964
).
“A cross-language study of voicing in stops: Acoustical measurements
,”
Word
20
,
384
422
.
30.
Litvak
,
L.
,
Spahr
,
A.
,
Saoji
A.
, and
Fridman
,
G.
(
2007
). “
Relationship between perception of spectral ripple and speech recognition in cochlear implant and vocoder listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
122
,
982
991
.
31.
Loebach
,
J. L.
,
Pisoni
,
D. B.
, and
Svirsky
,
M. A.
(
2010
). “
Effects of semantic context and feedback on perceptual learning of speech processed through an acoustic simulation of a cochlear implant
,”
J. Exp. Psych.: Hum. Percept. Perf.
36
(
1
),
224
234
.
32.
Loizou
,
P.
, and
Poroy
,
O.
(
2001
). “
Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
110
,
1619
1627
.
33.
Mattys
,
S. L.
, and
Scharenborg
,
O.
(
2014
). “
Phoneme categorization and discrimination in younger and older adults: A comparative analysis of perceptual, lexical, and attentional factors
,”
Psychol. Aging
29
(1),
150
162
.
34.
Mattys
,
S. L.
, and
Wiget
,
L.
(
2011
). “
Effects of cognitive load on speech recognition
,”
J. Memory Lang.
65
(2),
145
160
.
35.
McClelland
,
J.
, and
Elman
,
J.
(
1986
). “
The TRACE model of speech perception
,”
Cog. Psych.
18
,
1
86
.
36.
McMurray
,
B.
,
Farris-Trimble
,
A.
, and
Rigler
,
H.
(
2017
). “
Waiting for lexical access: Cochlear implants or severely degraded input lead listeners to process speech less incrementally
,”
Cognition
169
,
147
164
.
37.
McMurray
,
B.
, and
Jongman
,
A.
(
2011
). “
What information is necessary for speech categorization? Harnessing variability in the speech signal by integrating cues computed relative to expectations
,”
Psychol. Rev.
118
(
2
),
219
246
.
38.
Moberly
,
A.
,
Lowenstein
,
J.
, and
Nittrouer
,
S.
(
2016
). “
Word recognition variability with cochlear implants: ‘perceptual attention’ versus ‘auditory sensitivity,’
 ”
Ear Hear.
37
,
14
26
.
39.
Munson
,
B.
,
Donaldson
,
G.
,
Allen
,
S.
,
Collison
,
E.
, and
Nelson
,
D.
(
2003
). “
Patterns of phoneme perception errors by listeners with cochlear implants as a function of overall speech perception ability
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
113
(
2
),
925
935
.
40.
Norris
,
D.
,
McQueen
,
J.
, and
Cutler
,
A.
(
2003
). “
Perceptual learning in speech
,”
Cognitive Psychol.
47
,
204
238
.
41.
Nusbaum
,
H.
,
Pisoni
,
D.
, and
Davis
,
C.
(
1984
). “
Sizing up the Hoosier mental lexicon: Measuring the familiarity of 20,000 words
,” Research on Speech Perception, Progress Report 10, Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, pp.
357
376
.
42.
Patro
,
C.
, and
Mendel
,
L. L.
(
2016
). “
Role of contextual cues on the perception of spectrally reduced interrupted speech
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
140
,
1336
1345
.
43.
Pichora-Fuller
,
K.
,
Schneider
,
B.
, and
Daneman
,
M.
(
1995
). “
How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
97
,
593
608
.
44.
R Core Team
(
2016
). “
R: A language and environment for statistical computing
,” R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, www.R-project.org (Last viewed November 6, 2019).
45.
Schertz
,
J.
, and
Hawthorne
,
K.
(
2018
). “
The effect of sentential context on phonetic categorization is modulated by talker accent and exposure
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
143
,
EL231
EL236
.
46.
Shannon
,
R.
,
Zeng
,
F.
,
Kamath
,
V.
,
Wygonski
,
J.
, and
Ekelid
,
M.
(
1995
). “
Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues
,”
Science
270
,
303
304
.
47.
Smart
,
J.
, and
Frisch
,
S.
(
2015
). “
Top-down influences in perception with spectrally degraded resynthesized natural speech
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
138
,
1810
.
48.
Souza
,
P.
, and
Rosen
,
S.
(
2009
). “
Effects of envelope bandwidth on the intelligibility of sine- and noise vocoded speech
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
126
(
2
),
792
805
.
49.
Stafford
,
R.
,
Stafford
,
J.
,
Wells
,
J.
,
Loizou
,
P.
, and
Keller
,
M.
(
2013
). “
Vocoder simulations of highly focused cochlear implant stimulation with limited dynamic range and discriminable step
,”
Ear Hear.
35
,
262
270
.
50.
Strange
,
W.
,
Jenkins
,
J.
, and
Johnson
,
T.
(
1983
). “
Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
74
,
695
705
.
51.
Svirsky
,
M.
,
Fitzgerald
,
M.
,
Sagi
,
E.
, and
Glassman
,
E.
(
2015
). “
Bilateral cochlear implants with large asymmetries in electrode insertion depth: Implications for the study of auditory plasticity
,”
Acta Oto-Laryngologica
135
(
4
),
354
363
.
52.
Van Engen
,
K.
,
Chandrasekaran
,
B.
, and
Smiljanic
,
R.
(
2012
). “
Effects of speech clarity on recognition memory for spoken sentences
,”
PLoS One
7
(
9
),
e43753
.
53.
Vitevitch
,
M.
,
Luce
,
P. A.
,
Charles-Luce
,
J.
, and
Kemmerer
,
D.
(
1997
). “
Phonotactics and syllable stress: Implications for the processing of spoken nonsense words
,”
Lang. Speech
40
,
47
62
.
54.
Vitevitch
,
M. S.
, and
Luce
,
P. A.
(
2004
). “
A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English
,”
Behav. Res. Methods, Instrum., Comput.
36
,
481
487
.
55.
Winn
,
M.
,
Chatterjee
,
M.
, and
Idsardi
,
W. J.
(
2012
). “
The use of acoustic cues for phonetic identification: Effects of spectral degradation and electric hearing
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
131
,
1465
1479
.
56.
Winn
,
M.
,
Edwards
,
J. R.
, and
Litovsky
,
R. Y.
(
2015
). “
The impact of auditory spectral resolution in listeners with cochlear implants
,”
Ear Hear.
36
(
4
),
e153
e165
.
57.
Winn
,
M.
,
Rhone
,
A.
,
Chatterjee
,
M.
, and
Idsardi
,
W.
(
2013
). “
Auditory and visual context effects in phonetic perception by normal-hearing listeners and listeners with cochlear implants
,”
Front. Psych. Auditory Cogn. Neurosci.
4
,
1
13
.
58.
Winn
,
M. B.
, and
Litovsky
,
R. Y.
(
2015
). “
Using speech sounds to test functional spectral resolution in listeners with cochlear implants
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
137
(
3
),
1430
1442
.
59.
Winn
,
M. B.
,
Won
,
J. H.
, and
Moon
,
I. J.
(
2016
). “
Assessment of spectral and temporal resolution in cochlear implant users using psychoacoustic discrimination and speech cue categorization
,”
Ear Hear
37
,
e377
e390
.
60.
Xu
,
L.
,
Thompson
,
C.
, and
Pfingst
,
B.
(
2005
). “
Relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
117
,
3255
3267
.

Supplementary Material

You do not currently have access to this content.