Previous research has suggested that a greater degree of social indexing of gender, race, and regional background is produced in linguistic contexts that promote phonetic reduction. The goal of the current study was to explore this hypothesis through an examination of the realization of an ongoing sound change in the American Midwest—/u/ fronting—as a function of four linguistic factors that contribute to phonetic reduction: lexical frequency, phonological neighborhood density, discourse mention, and speaking style. The results revealed minimal effects of the linguistic factors on the degree of /u/ fronting among talkers with greater overall advancement in the /u/ fronting change-in-progress, suggesting that the process of /u/ fronting is nearing completion among some American Midwesterners. However, the results also revealed more /u/ fronting in plain laboratory speech than in clear laboratory speech and in low-frequency, low-density words than in low-frequency, high-density words among talkers with lower overall advancement in the /u/ fronting change-in-progress. The directions of these effects are consistent with the hypothesis that social indexing is greater in reduction-promoting contexts. Further, the relative sizes of these effects suggest that speaking style contributes more to variability in social indexing than lexical properties, such as frequency and neighborhood density.

1.
Anderson
,
B. L.
(
2002
). “
Dialect leveling and /ai/ monophthongization among African American Detroiters
,”
J. Sociolinguist.
6
,
86
98
.
2.
Anderson
,
B. L.
(
2008
).
Migration, Accommodation, and Language Change: At the Intersection of Regional and Ethnic Identity
(
Palgrave Macmillan
,
New York
).
3.
Aylett
,
M.
, and
Turk
,
A.
(
2004
). “
The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: A functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech
,”
Lang. Speech
47
,
31
56
.
4.
Baese-Berk
,
M.
, and
Goldrick
,
M.
(
2009
). “
Mechanisms of interaction in speech production
,”
Lang. Cognit. Process.
24
,
527
554
.
5.
Bailey
,
G.
, and
Thomas
,
E.
(
1998
). “
Some aspects of African-American Vernacular English phonology
,” in
African American English: Structure, History, Use
, edited by
S.
Mufwene
,
J.
Rickford
,
G.
Bailey
, and
J.
Baugh
(
Routledge
,
London
), pp.
85
109
.
6.
Baker
,
R. E.
, and
Bradlow
,
A. R.
(
2009
). “
Variability in word duration as a function of probability, speech style, and prosody
,”
Lang. Speech
52
,
391
413
.
7.
Baranowski
,
M.
(
2008
). “
The fronting of the back upgliding vowels in Charleston, South Carolina
,”
Lang. Var. Change
20
,
527
551
.
8.
Bates
,
D.
,
Kliegl
,
R.
,
Vasishth
,
S.
, and
Baayen
,
R. H.
(
2015
). “
Parsimonious mixed models
,” arXiv:1506.04967.
9.
Bell
,
A.
(
1984
). “
Language style as audience design
,”
Lang. Soc.
13
,
145
204
.
10.
Bell
,
A.
,
Brenier
,
J. M.
,
Gregory
,
M.
,
Girand
,
C.
, and
Jurafsky
,
D.
(
2009
). “
Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English
,”
J. Mem. Lang.
60
,
92
111
.
11.
Bradlow
,
A. R.
,
Torretta
,
G. M.
, and
Pisoni
,
D. B.
(
1996
). “
Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics
,”
Speech Commun.
20
,
255
272
.
12.
Browman
,
C. P.
, and
Goldstein
,
L.
(
1992
). “ 
‘Targetless’ schwa: An articulatory analysis
,” in
Papers in Laboratory Phonology II: Gesture, Segment, Prosody
, edited by
G. J.
Docherty
and
D. R.
Ladd
(
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
), pp.
26
67
.
13.
Burdin
,
R. S.
,
Turnbull
,
R.
, and
Clopper
,
C. G.
(
2015
). “
Interactions among lexical and discourse characteristics in vowel production
,”
Proc. Meet. Acoust.
22
,
060005
.
14.
Campbell-Kibler
,
K.
(
2012
). “
Contestation and enregisterment in Ohio's imagined dialects
,”
J. Eng. Ling.
40
,
281
305
.
15.
Chung
,
H.
,
Kong
,
E. J.
,
Edwards
,
J.
,
Weismer
,
G.
,
Fourakis
,
M.
, and
Hwang
,
Y.
(
2012
). “
Cross-linguistic studies of children's and adults' vowel spaces
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
131
,
442
454
.
16.
Clopper
,
C. G.
,
Mitsch
,
J. F.
, and
Tamati
,
T. N.
(
2017
). “
Effects of phonetic reduction and regional dialect on vowel production
,”
J. Phonetics
60
,
38
59
.
17.
Clopper
,
C. G.
, and
Pierrehumbert
,
J. B.
(
2008
). “
Effects of semantic predictability and regional dialect on vowel space reduction
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
124
,
1682
1688
.
18.
Clopper
,
C. G.
,
Pisoni
,
D. B.
, and
de Jong
,
K.
(
2005
). “
Acoustic characteristics of the vowel systems of six regional varieties of American English
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
118
,
1661
1676
.
19.
Clopper
,
C. G.
,
Turnbull
,
R.
, and
Burdin
,
R. S.
(
2018
). “
Assessing predictability effects in connected read speech
,”
Ling. Vanguard
4
(
S2
),
1
13
.
20.
Cole
,
J.
,
Linebaugh
,
G.
,
Munson
,
C. M.
, and
McMurray
,
B.
(
2010
). “
Unmasking the acoustic effects of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: A statistical modeling approach
,”
J. Phonetics
38
,
167
184
.
21.
Drager
,
K.
(
2011
). “
Speaker age and vowel perception
,”
Lang. Speech
54
,
99
121
.
22.
Eberhardt
,
M.
(
2009
). “
African American and white vowel systems in Pittsburgh
,”
Publ. Am. Dialect. Soc.
94
,
129
157
.
23.
Ferguson
,
S. H.
, and
Kewley-Port
,
D.
(
2007
). “
Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: Acoustic characteristics of vowels
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
50
,
1241
1255
.
24.
Flemming
,
E.
(
2010
). “
Modeling listeners: Comments on Pluymaekers et al. and Scarborough
,” in
Laboratory Phonology 10
, edited by
C.
Fougeron
,
B.
Kühnert
,
M.
D'Imperio
, and
N.
Vallée
(
De Gruyter Mouton
,
Berlin
), pp.
587
605
.
25.
Fought
,
C.
(
1999
). “
A majority sound change in a minority community: /u/ -fronting in Chicano English
,”
J. Sociolinguist.
3
,
5
23
.
26.
Fourakis
,
M.
(
1991
). “
Tempo, stress, and vowel reduction in American English
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
90
,
1816
1827
.
27.
Fowler
,
C. A.
, and
Housum
,
J.
(
1987
). “
Talkers' signalling of ‘new’ and ‘old’ words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction
,”
J. Mem. Lang.
26
,
489
504
.
28.
Fridland
,
V.
(
2008
). “
Patterns of /uw/, /ʊ/, and /ow/ fronting in Reno, Nevada
,”
Am. Speech
83
,
432
454
.
29.
Fridland
,
V.
, and
Bartlett
,
K.
(
2006
). “
The social and linguistic conditioning of back vowel fronting across ethnic groups in Memphis, Tennessee
,”
Eng. Lang. Ling.
10
,
1
22
.
30.
Gahl
,
S.
,
Yao
,
Y.
, and
Johnson
,
K.
(
2012
). “
Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech
,”
J. Mem. Lang.
66
,
789
806
.
31.
Hall-Lew
,
L.
(
2011
). “
The completion of a sound change in California English
,” in
Proc. 17th Int. Congress Phonetic Sci.
, pp.
807
810
.
32.
Harrington
,
J.
,
Kleber
,
F.
, and
Reubold
,
U.
(
2008
). “
Compensation for coarticulation, /u/-fronting, and sound change in standard southern British: An acoustic and perceptual study
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
123
,
2825
2835
.
33.
Hay
,
J.
,
Jannedy
,
S.
, and
Mendoza-Denton
,
N.
(
1999
). “
Oprah and /ay/: Lexical frequency, referee design, and style
,” in
Proc. 14th Int. Congress Phonetic Sci.
, pp.
1389
1392
.
34.
Hillenbrand
,
J. M.
,
Clark
,
M. J.
, and
Nearey
,
T. M.
(
2001
). “
Effects of consonant environment on vowel formant patterns
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
,
748
763
.
35.
Holt
,
Y. F.
(
2018
). “
Mechanisms of vowel variation in African American English
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
61
,
197
209
.
36.
Johnstone
,
B.
, and
Kiesling
,
S. F.
(
2008
). “
Indexicality and experience: Exploring the meanings of /aw/-monophthongization in Pittsburgh
,”
J. Sociolinguist.
12
,
5
33
.
37.
Jurafsky
,
D.
,
Bell
,
A.
,
Gregory
,
M.
, and
Raymond
,
W. D.
(
2001
). “
Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production
,” in
Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure
, edited by
J.
Bybee
and
P.
Hopper
(
Benjamins
,
Amsterdam
), pp.
229
254
.
38.
Kendall
,
T.
, and
Fridland
,
V.
(
2012
). “
Variation in perception and production of mid front vowels in the U.S. southern vowel shift
,”
J. Phonetics
40
,
289
306
.
39.
Kiesling
,
S. F.
(
2004
). “
Dude
,”
Am. Speech.
79
,
281
305
.
40.
Kuo
,
C.
, and
Weismer
,
G.
(
2016
). “
Vowel reduction across tasks for male speakers of American English
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
140
,
369
383
.
41.
Labov
,
W.
(
1972
).
Sociolinguistic Patterns
(
University of Pennsylvania
,
Philadelphia
).
42.
Labov
,
W.
(
1994
).
Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors
(
Blackwell
,
Malden, MA
).
43.
Labov
,
W.
(
2001
).
Principles of Linguistic Change: Social Factors
(
Blackwell
,
Malden, MA
).
44.
Labov
,
W.
,
Ash
,
S.
, and
Boberg
,
C.
(
2006
).
Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology and Sound Change
(
Mouton de Gruyter
,
New York
).
45.
Lam
,
T. Q.
, and
Watson
,
D. G.
(
2010
). “
Repetition is easy: Why repeated referents have reduced prominence
,”
Mem. Cognit.
38
,
1137
1146
.
46.
Lindblom
,
B.
(
1990
). “
Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory
,” in
Speech Production and Speech Modelling
, edited by
W. J.
Hardcastle
and
A.
Marchal
(
Kluwer
,
Dordrecht
), pp.
403
439
.
47.
Mendoza-Denton
,
N.
,
Hay
,
J.
, and
Jannedy
,
S.
(
2003
). “
Probabilistic sociolinguistics: Beyond variable rules
,” in
Probabilistic Linguistics
, edited by
R.
Bod
,
J.
Hay
, and
S.
Jannedy
(
MIT Press
,
Cambridge, MA
), pp.
97
138
.
48.
Moon
,
S.-J.
, and
Lindblom
,
B.
(
1994
). “
Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
96
,
40
55
.
49.
Munson
,
B.
(
2007
). “
Lexical characteristics mediate the influence of sex and sex typicality on vowel-space size
,” in
Proc. 16th Int. Congress Phonetic Sci.
, pp.
885
888
.
50.
Munson
,
B.
, and
Solomon
,
N. P.
(
2004
). “
The effect of phonological neighborhood density on vowel articulation
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
47
,
1048
1058
.
51.
Nusbaum
,
H. C.
,
Pisoni
,
D. B.
, and
Davis
,
C. K.
(
1984
). “
Sizing up the Hoosier mental lexicon: Measuring the familiarity of 20,000 words
,” in
Research on Speech Perception Progress Report No. 10
(
Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University
,
Bloomington, IN
), pp.
357
376
.
52.
Peterson
,
G. E.
, and
Lehiste
,
I.
(
1960
). “
Duration of syllable nuclei in English
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
32
,
693
703
.
53.
Picheny
,
M. A.
,
Durlach
,
N. I.
, and
Braida
,
L. D.
(
1986
). “
Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
29
,
434
445
.
54.
Reed
,
P. E.
(
2014
). “
Inter- and intra-generational /aɪ/ monophthongization, indexicality, and Southern Appalachian identity
,”
South. J. Linguist.
38
,
159
194
.
55.
Scarborough
,
R.
(
2010
). “
Lexical and contextual predictability: Confluent effects on the production of vowels
,” in
Laboratory Phonology 10
, edited by
C.
Fougeron
,
B.
Kühnert
,
M.
D'Imperio
, and
N.
Vallée
(
De Gruyter Mouton
,
Berlin
), pp.
557
586
.
56.
Scarborough
,
R.
(
2013
). “
Neighborhood-conditioned patterns in phonetic detail: Relating coarticulation and hyperarticulation
,”
J. Phonetics
41
,
491
508
.
57.
Scarborough
,
R.
,
Brenier
,
J.
,
Zhao
,
Y.
,
Hall-Lew
,
L.
, and
Dmitrieva
,
O.
(
2007
). “
An acoustic study of real and imagined foreigner-directed speech
,” in
Proc. 16th Int. Congress Phonetic Sci.
, pp.
2165
2168
.
58.
Scarborough
,
R.
, and
Zellou
,
G.
(
2013
). “
Clarity in communication: ‘Clear’ speech authenticity and lexical neighborhood density effects in speech production and perception
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
134
,
3793
3807
.
59.
Slobe
,
T.
(
2018
). “
Style, stance, and social meaning in mock white girl
,”
Lang. Soc.
47
,
541
567
.
60.
Smiljanic
,
R.
, and
Bradlow
,
A. R.
(
2005
). “
Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
118
,
1677
1688
.
61.
Smiljanic
,
R.
, and
Bradlow
,
A. R.
(
2008
). “
Temporal organization of English clear and conversational speech
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
124
,
3171
3182
.
62.
Stevens
,
K. N.
, and
House
,
A. S.
(
1963
). “
Perturbation of vowel articulations by consonantal context: An acoustical study
,”
J. Speech. Hear. Res.
6
,
111
128
.
63.
Thomas
,
E. R.
(
2001
).
An Acoustic Analysis of Vowel Variation in New World English
(
Duke University Press
,
Durham, NC
).
64.
Thomas
,
E. R.
(
2007
). “
Phonological and phonetic characteristics of African American Vernacular English
,”
Lang. Ling. Compass
1
,
450
475
.
65.
Traunmüller
,
H.
(
1990
). “
Analytical expressions for the tonotopic sensory scale
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
88
,
97
100
.
66.
Turnbull
,
R.
(
2017
). “
The role of predictability in intonational variability
,”
Lang. Speech
60
,
123
153
.
67.
van Bergem
,
D. R.
(
1993
). “
Acoustic vowel reduction as a function of sentence accent, word stress, and word class
,”
Speech Commun.
12
,
1
21
.
68.
Watson
,
D. G.
(
2010
). “
The many roads to prominence: Understanding emphasis in conversation
,”
Psych. Learn. Motiv.
52
,
163
183
.
69.
Wolfram
,
W.
(
1994
). “
The phonology of a sociocultural variety: The case of African American Vernacular English
,” in
Child Phonology: Characteristics, Assessment, and Intervention with Special Populations
, edited by
J.
Bernthal
and
N.
Bankson
(
Thieme
,
New York
), pp.
227
244
.
70.
Wright
,
R.
(
2004
). “
Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation
,” in
Phonetic Interpretation: Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI
, edited by
J.
Local
,
R.
Ogden
, and
R.
Temple
(
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
), pp.
75
86
.
71.
Yuan
,
J.
, and
Liberman
,
M.
(
2008
). “
Speaker identification on the SCOTUS corpus
,” in
Proc. Acoust. '08
, pp.
5687
5690
.
72.
Zellou
,
G.
, and
Scarborough
,
R.
(
2015
). “
Lexically conditioned phonetic variation in motherese: Age-of-acquisition and other word-specific factors in infant- and adult-directed speech
,”
Lab. Phonol.
6
,
305
336
.
You do not currently have access to this content.