Regulators in Europe and in the United States have developed sound exposure criteria. Criteria range from broadband levels to frequency weighted received sound levels. The associated differences in impact assessment results are, however, not yet understood. This uncertainty makes environmental management of transboundary anthropogenic noise challenging and causes confusion for regulators who need to choose appropriate exposure criteria. In the present study, three established exposure criteria frameworks from Germany, Denmark, and the US were used to analyse the effect of impact pile driving at a location in the Baltic Sea on harbor porpoise and harbor seal hearing. The acoustic modeling using MIKE showed that an unmitigated scenario would lead to auditory injury for all three criteria. Despite readily apparent variances in impact ranges among the applied approaches, it was also evident that noise mitigation measures could reduce underwater sound to levels where auditory injuries would be unlikely in most cases. It was concluded that each of the frameworks has its own advantages and disadvantages. Single noise exposure criteria follow the precautionary principle and can be enforced relatively easily, whereas criteria that consider hearing capabilities and animal response movement can improve the accuracy of the assessment if data are available.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
May 31 2019
Effect of impact pile driving noise on marine mammals: A comparison of different noise exposure criteria
Uwe Stöber;
Uwe Stöber
a)
DHI WASY GmbH
, Volmerstraße 8, 12489 Berlin, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Frank Thomsen
Frank Thomsen
DHI A/S
, Agern Allé 5, 2970 Hørsholm, Denmark
Search for other works by this author on:
a)
Electronic mail: usto@dhigroup.com
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 145, 3252–3259 (2019)
Article history
Received:
July 27 2018
Accepted:
May 08 2019
Citation
Uwe Stöber, Frank Thomsen; Effect of impact pile driving noise on marine mammals: A comparison of different noise exposure criteria. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 May 2019; 145 (5): 3252–3259. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5109387
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionPay-Per-View Access
$40.00