Estimating the basic acoustic parameters of conversational speech in noisy real-world conditions has been an elusive task in hearing research. Nevertheless, these data are essential ingredients for speech intelligibility tests and fitting rules for hearing aids. Previous surveys did not provide clear methodology for their acoustic measurements and setups, were opaque about their samples, or did not control for distance between the talker and listener, even though people are known to adapt their distance in noisy conversations. In the present study, conversations were elicited between pairs of people by asking them to play a collaborative game that required them to communicate. While performing this task, the subjects listened to binaural recordings of different everyday scenes, which were presented to them at their original sound pressure level (SPL) via highly open headphones. Their voices were recorded separately using calibrated headset microphones. The subjects were seated inside an anechoic chamber at 1 and 0.5 m distances. Precise estimates of realistic speech levels and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) were obtained for the different acoustic scenes, at broadband and third octave levels. It is shown that with acoustic background noise at above approximately 69 dB SPL at 1 m distance, or 75 dB SPL at 0.5 m, the average SNR can become negative. It is shown through interpolation of the two conditions that if the conversation partners would have been allowed to optimize their positions by moving closer to each other, then positive SNRs should be only observed above 75 dB SPL. The implications of the results on speech tests and hearing aid fitting rules are discussed.

1.
Accredited Standards Committee S3, Bioacoustics
(
1997
). ANSI s3.5-1997,
Methods for Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index
(
American National Standards Institute
,
New York
).
2.
Bates
,
D.
,
Mächler
,
M.
,
Bolker
,
B.
, and
Walker
,
S.
(
2015
). “
Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4
,”
J. Stat. Software
67
(
1
),
1
48
.
3.
Beechey
,
T.
,
Buchholz
,
J. M.
, and
Keidser
,
G.
(
2018
). “
Measuring communication difficulty through effortful speech production during conversation
,”
Speech Commun.
100
,
18
29
.
4.
Bench
,
J.
,
Kowal
,
Å.
, and
Bamford
,
J.
(
1979
). “
The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children
,”
Br. J. Audiol.
13
(
3
),
108
112
.
5.
Bode
,
D.
, and
Carhart
,
R.
(
1973
). “
Measurement of articulation functions using adaptive test procedures
,”
IEEE Trans Audio Electroacoust.
21
(
3
),
196
201
.
6.
Brimijoin
,
W. O.
,
Hadley
,
L. V.
,
Naylor
,
G. M.
, and
Whitmer
,
W. M.
(
2017
). “
Parametric measurements of natural conversation behaviour reveal effects of background noise level on speech, movement, and gaze
,” in
6th International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research (ISAAR)
.
7.
Brimijoin
,
W. O.
,
McShefferty
,
D.
, and
Akeroyd
,
M. A.
(
2012
). “
Undirected head movements of listeners with asymmetrical hearing impairment during a speech-in-noise task
,”
Hear. Res.
283
(
1–2
),
162
168
.
8.
Carhart
,
R.
, and
Tillman
,
T. W.
(
1970
). “
Interaction of competing speech signals with hearing losses
,”
Arch. Otolaryngol.
91
(
3
),
273
279
.
9.
Ching
,
T. Y.
,
Incerti
,
P.
, and
Hill
,
M.
(
2004
). “
Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears
,”
Ear Hear.
25
(
1
),
9
21
.
10.
Cox
,
R. M.
,
Alexander
,
G. C.
, and
Gilmore
,
C.
(
1987a
). “
Development of the connected speech test (CST)
,”
Ear Hear.
8
(
5
),
119S
126S
.
11.
Cox
,
R. M.
,
Alexander
,
G. C.
, and
Gilmore
,
C.
(
1987b
). “
Intelligibility of average talkers in typical listening environments
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
81
(
5
),
1598
1608
.
12.
Culling
,
J. F.
(
2016
). “
Speech intelligibility in virtual restaurants
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
140
(
4
),
2418
2426
.
13.
Grange
,
J. A.
, and
Culling
,
J. F.
(
2016
). “
The benefit of head orientation to speech intelligibility in noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
139
(
2
),
703
712
.
14.
Hagerman
,
B.
(
1982
). “
Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise
,”
Scand. Audiol.
11
(
2
),
79
87
.
15.
Hagerman
,
B.
(
1984
). “
Clinical measurements of speech reception threshold in noise
,”
Scand. Audiol.
13
(
1
),
57
63
.
16.
Hanks
,
W. D.
, and
Johnson
,
G. D.
(
1998
). “
Hint list equivalency using older listeners
,”
J. Speech, Lang. Hear. Res.
41
(
6
),
1335
1340
.
17.
IEC
(
2011
).
IEC 60268-16
, edition 4.0 (2011-06), “
Sound System Equipment—Part 16: Objective Rating of Speech Intelligibility by Speech Transmission Index
,” (
International Electrotechnical Commission
,
Geneva, Switzerland
).
18.
Junqua
,
J.-C.
(
1993
). “
The Lombard reflex and its role on human listeners and automatic speech recognizers
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
93
(
1
),
510
524
.
19.
Kalikow
,
D. N.
,
Stevens
,
K. N.
, and
Elliott
,
L. L.
(
1977
). “
Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
61
(
5
),
1337
1351
.
20.
Lane
,
H.
, and
Tranel
,
B.
(
1971
). “
The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech
,”
J. Speech, Lang. Hear. Res.
14
(
4
),
677
709
.
21.
Lane
,
H.
,
Tranel
,
B.
, and
Sisson
,
C.
(
1970
). “
Regulation of voice communication by sensory dynamics
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
47
(
2B
),
618
624
.
22.
Levitt
,
H.
, and
Rabiner
,
L. R.
(
1967
). “
Use of a sequential strategy in intelligibility testing
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
42
(
3
),
609
612
.
23.
Lombard
,
E.
(
1911
). “
Le signe de l'elevation de la voix
” (“The sign of the elevation of the voice”),
Ann. Maladiers Oreille.
37
,
101
119
.
24.
Lunner
,
T.
,
Rudner
,
M.
,
Rosenbom
,
T.
,
Ågren
,
J.
, and
Ng
,
E. H. N.
(
2016
). “
Using speech recall in hearing aid fitting and outcome evaluation under ecological test conditions
,”
Ear Hear.
37
,
145S
154S
.
25.
MacLeod
,
A.
, and
Summerfield
,
Q.
(
1990
). “
A procedure for measuring auditory and audiovisual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: Rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use
,”
Br. J. Audiol.
24
(
1
),
29
43
.
26.
Monson
,
B. B.
,
Hunter
,
E. J.
, and
Story
,
B. H.
(
2012
). “
Horizontal directivity of low- and high-frequency energy in speech and singing
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
132
(
1
),
433
441
.
27.
Naylor
,
G.
(
2016
). “
Theoretical issues of validity in the measurement of aided speech reception threshold in noise for comparing nonlinear hearing aid systems
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol.
27
(
7
),
504
514
.
28.
Nielsen
,
J. B.
, and
Dau
,
T.
(
2009
). “
Development of a Danish speech intelligibility test
,”
Int. J. Audiol.
48
(
10
),
729
741
.
29.
Nilsson
,
M.
,
Soli
,
S. D.
, and
Sullivan
,
J. A.
(
1994
). “
Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
95
(
2
),
1085
1099
.
30.
Pearsons
,
K. S.
,
Bennett
,
R. L.
, and
Fidell
,
S.
(
1977
).
Speech Levels in Various Noise Environments
(
US Environmental Agency, Office of Health and Ecological Effects, Office of Research and Development
,
Washington, DC
).
31.
Pelegrín-García
,
D.
,
Smits
,
B.
,
Brunskog
,
J.
, and
Jeong
,
C.
(
2011
). “
Vocal effort with changing talker-to-listener distance in different acoustic environments
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
129
(
4
),
1981
1990
.
32.
Plomp
,
R.
(
1986
). “
A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired
,”
J. Speech, Lang. Hear. Res.
29
(
2
),
146
154
.
33.
Ricketts
,
T. A.
, and
Hornsby
,
B. W.
(
2005
). “
Sound quality measures for speech in noise through a commercial hearing aid implementing
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol.
16
(
5
),
270
277
.
34.
Smeds
,
K.
,
Wolters
,
F.
, and
Rung
,
M.
(
2015
). “
Estimation of signal-to-noise ratios in realistic sound scenarios
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol.
26
(
2
),
183
196
.
35.
Sommer
,
R.
(
2002
). “
Personal space in a digital age
,” in
Handbook of Environmental Psychology
, edited by
R. B.
Bechtel
and
A.
Churchman
(
John Wiley & Sons., Inc.
,
New York
), pp.
647
660
.
36.
Sumby
,
W. H.
, and
Pollack
,
I.
(
1954
). “
Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
26
(
2
),
212
215
.
37.
Sussman
,
N. M.
, and
Rosenfeld
,
H. M.
(
1982
). “
Influence of culture, language, and sex on conversational distance.
J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.
42
(
1
),
66
.
38.
Wagener
,
K. C.
,
Hansen
,
M.
, and
Ludvigsen
,
C.
(
2008
). “
Recording and classification of the acoustic environment of hearing aid users
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol.
19
(
4
),
348
370
.
39.
Warren
,
R.
(
1968
). “
Vocal compensation for change of distance
,” in
Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Acoustics
, International Commission for Acoustics Tokyo, pp.
61
64
.
40.
Weisser
,
A.
(
2018
). “
Complex acoustic environments: Concepts, methods, and auditory perception
,” Ph.D. thesis,
Macquarie University
.
41.
Wu
,
Y.-H.
,
Stangl
,
E.
,
Chipara
,
O.
,
Hasan
,
S. S.
,
Welhaven
,
A.
, and
Oleson
,
J.
(
2018
). “
Characteristics of real-world signal to noise ratios and speech listening situations of older adults with mild to moderate hearing loss
,”
Ear Hear.
39
(
2
),
293
304
.
42.
Zahorik
,
P.
, and
Kelly
,
J. W.
(
2007
). “
Accurate vocal compensation for sound intensity loss with increasing distance in natural environments
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
122
(
5
),
EL143
EL150
.
You do not currently have access to this content.