Bias errors for two-dimensional active acoustic intensity using multi-microphone probes have been previously calculated for both the traditional cross-spectral and the Phase and Amplitude Gradient Estimator (PAGE) methods [Whiting, Lawrence, Gee, Neilsen, and Sommerfeldt, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 142, 2208–2218 (2017)]. Here, these calculations are expanded to include errors due to contaminating noise, as well as probe orientation. The noise can either be uncorrelated at each microphone location or self-correlated; the self-correlated noise is modeled as a plane-wave with a varying angle of incidence. The intensity errors in both magnitude and direction are dependent on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), frequency, source properties, incidence angles, probe configuration, and processing method. The PAGE method is generally found to give more accurate results, especially in direction; however, uncorrelated noise with a low SNR (below 10–15 dB) and low frequency (wavelengths more than 1/4 the microphone spacing) can yield larger errors in magnitude than the traditional method—though a correction for this is possible. Additionally, contaminating noise does not necessarily impact the possibility of using the PAGE method for broadband signals beyond a probe's spatial Nyquist frequency.

1.
F. J.
Fahy
,
Sound Intensity
(
Spon
,
London
,
1995
), pp.
1
295
.
2.
F. J.
Fahy
, “
Measurement of acoustic intensity using the cross-spectral density of two microphone signals
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
62
,
1057
1059
(
1977
).
3.
M. J.
Crocker
, “
Measurement of sound intensity
,” in
Handbook of Acoustical Measurements and Noise Control
(
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
,
1991
), pp.
14.1
14.17
.
4.
J. Y.
Chung
, “
Cross-spectral method of measuring acoustic intensity without error caused by instrument phase mismatch
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
64
,
1613
1616
(
1978
).
5.
D. C.
Thomas
,
B. Y.
Christensen
, and
K. L.
Gee
, “
Phase and amplitude gradient method for the estimation of acoustic vector quantities
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
137
,
3366
3376
(
2015
).
6.
D. K.
Torrie
,
E. B.
Whiting
,
K. L.
Gee
,
T. B.
Neilsen
, and
S. D.
Sommerfeldt
, “
Initial laboratory experiments to validate a phase and amplitude gradient estimator method for the calculation of acoustic intensity
,”
Proc. Mtgs. Acoust.
23
,
030005
(
2015
).
7.
J. A.
Mann
 III
and
J.
Tichy
, “
Acoustic intensity analysis: Distinguishing energy propagation and wave-front propagation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
90
,
20
25
(
1991
).
8.
E. B.
Whiting
,
J. S.
Lawrence
,
K. L.
Gee
,
T. B.
Neilsen
, and
S. D.
Sommerfeldt
, “
Bias error analysis for phase and amplitude gradient estimation of acoustic intensity and specific acoustic impedance
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
142
,
2208
2218
(
2017
).
9.
E. B.
Whiting
, “
Energy quantity estimation in radiated acoustic fields
,” MS thesis,
Brigham Young University
,
2016
.
10.
J. S.
Lawrence
,
E. B.
Whiting
,
K. L.
Gee
,
R. D.
Rasband
,
T. B.
Neilsen
, and
S. D.
Sommerfeldt
, “
Three-microphone probe bias error for acoustic intensity and specific acoustic impedance
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
143
,
EL81
EL86
(
2018
).
11.
M. R.
Cook
,
K. L.
Gee
,
S. D.
Sommerfeldt
, and
T. B.
Neilsen
, “
Coherence-based phase unwrapping for broadband acoustic signals
,”
Proc. Mtgs. Acoust.
30
,
055005
(
2017
).
12.
J. S.
Bendat
and
A. G.
Piersol
,
Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures
(
Wiley, Hoboken
,
NJ
,
2010
).
13.
C. H.
Oppenheimer
, “
A statistical background noise correction sensitive to the steadiness of background noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
140
,
2888
2922
(
2016
).
14.
E. Y.
Lo
and
M. C.
Junger
, “
Signal-to-noise enhancement by underwater intensity measurements
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
82
,
1450
1453
(
1987
).
15.
J. S.
Lawrence
,
K. L.
Gee
,
T. B.
Neilsen
, and
S. D.
Sommerfeldt
, “
Higher-order estimation of active and reactive acoustic intensity
,”
Proc. Mtgs. Acoust.
30
,
055004
(
2017
).
16.
L. S.
Goodfriend
, “
Correction chart for background noise
,”
Noise Control
4
(
3
),
56
(
1958
).
17.
S. E.
Bard
, “
A study of background noise variability in acoustical measurement laboratories
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
132
,
2086
(
2012
).
18.
C. H.
Oppenheimer
, “
An alternate background noise correction sensitive to the steadiness of background noise
,” ECMA TR/107 (
2015
).
You do not currently have access to this content.