Bias errors for two-dimensional active acoustic intensity using multi-microphone probes have been previously calculated for both the traditional cross-spectral and the Phase and Amplitude Gradient Estimator (PAGE) methods [Whiting, Lawrence, Gee, Neilsen, and Sommerfeldt, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 142, 2208–2218 (2017)]. Here, these calculations are expanded to include errors due to contaminating noise, as well as probe orientation. The noise can either be uncorrelated at each microphone location or self-correlated; the self-correlated noise is modeled as a plane-wave with a varying angle of incidence. The intensity errors in both magnitude and direction are dependent on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), frequency, source properties, incidence angles, probe configuration, and processing method. The PAGE method is generally found to give more accurate results, especially in direction; however, uncorrelated noise with a low SNR (below 10–15 dB) and low frequency (wavelengths more than 1/4 the microphone spacing) can yield larger errors in magnitude than the traditional method—though a correction for this is possible. Additionally, contaminating noise does not necessarily impact the possibility of using the PAGE method for broadband signals beyond a probe's spatial Nyquist frequency.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
,
Article navigation
January 2019
January 09 2019
The effects of contaminating noise on the calculation of active acoustic intensity for pressure gradient methods
Mylan R. Cook;
Mylan R. Cook
a)
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University
, N283 ESC Provo, Utah 84602, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Kent L. Gee;
Kent L. Gee
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University
, N283 ESC Provo, Utah 84602, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Tracianne B. Neilsen;
Tracianne B. Neilsen
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University
, N283 ESC Provo, Utah 84602, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Scott D. Sommerfeldt
Scott D. Sommerfeldt
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University
, N283 ESC Provo, Utah 84602, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Mylan R. Cook
a)
Kent L. Gee
Tracianne B. Neilsen
Scott D. Sommerfeldt
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University
, N283 ESC Provo, Utah 84602, USA
a)
Electronic mail: [email protected].
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 145, 173–184 (2019)
Article history
Received:
September 17 2018
Accepted:
November 27 2018
Citation
Mylan R. Cook, Kent L. Gee, Tracianne B. Neilsen, Scott D. Sommerfeldt; The effects of contaminating noise on the calculation of active acoustic intensity for pressure gradient methods. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 January 2019; 145 (1): 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5084046
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
I can't hear you without my glasses
Tessa Bent
Related Content
Bandwidth extension of narrowband-signal intensity calculation using additive, low-level broadband noise
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2019)
Bandwidth extension of intensity-based sound power estimates
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2020)
A coherence-based phase and amplitude gradient estimator method for calculating active acoustic intensity
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (June 2022)
Bias error analysis for phase and amplitude gradient estimation of acoustic intensity and specific acoustic impedance
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2017)
Three-microphone probe bias errors for acoustic intensity and specific acoustic impedance
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (February 2018)