Concerns have been raised about potential health effects of public exposure to ultrasound; however, there are few published surveys of measurements taken in public places. Results are presented of measurements taken in a selection of public places including train stations, shopping centres, galleries and museums, and the difficulties of taking measurements with conventional equipment are highlighted. Tones were identified in the 20 kHz third-octave band at 8 of the 14 locations tested; the characteristics of the tones are consistent with their source being Public Address or Voice Alarm systems. The measured results do not exceed existing interim guidelines for public exposure to ultrasound, and existing research suggests that no significant undesirable effects would be anticipated following exposure to ultrasound of this nature for short periods. The measured data may be reviewed against future public exposure guidelines which consider the variation in response across the population and between continuous and pulsed sources.

1.
T. G.
Leighton
, “
Are some people suffering as a result of increasing mass exposure of the public to ultrasound in air?
,”
Proc. R. Soc. A
472
,
20150624
(
2016
). Available from http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/385213/ (Last viewed July 26, 2016).
2.
B.
Paxton
and
J.
Harvie-Clark
, “
Public exposure to very high frequency sound and ultrasound: Do we know the risks?
,”
Proc. Inst. Acoust.
38
(Part
1
),
400
406
(
2016
).
3.
M.
Ueda
,
A.
Ota
, and
H.
Takahashi
, “
Investigation on high-frequency noise in public space. We tried noise abatement measures for displeasure people
,” in
Proceedings of the 7th Forum Acusticum
,
Krakow, Poland
(
September 7–12
,
2014
), p.
148
.
4.
M.
Ueda
,
A.
Ota
, and
H.
Takahashi
, “
Investigation on high-frequency noise in public space
,” in
Internoise 2014
,
Melbourne, Australia
(
November 16–19
,
2014
),
7
pp.
5.
C.
Glorieux
, “
Undesirable effects as a result of short-term exposure to an ultrasonic repellent device. Part I—Acoustic measurements
,” Assignment No. DGS/PB_PP/IVC/13026 from the Federal Public Service in Belgium for Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment (July 28,
2014
).
6.
P.
Mapp
, “
Ultrasonic surveillance monitoring of PA systems, a safety feature or audible hazard?
,”
Proc. Inst. Acoust.
38
(Part
2
),
1
16
(
2016
).
7.
International Non-Ionizing Radiation Committee of the International Radiation Protection Association (INIRC-IRPA)
, “
Interim guidelines on the limits of human exposure to airborne ultrasound
,”
Health Phys.
46
,
969
974
(
1984
).
8.
T. G.
Leighton
, “
Comment on ‘Are some people suffering as a result of increasing mass exposure of the public to ultrasound in air?,’
 ”
Proc. R. Soc. A
473
(
2199
),
20160828
(
2017
).
9.
A.
van Wieringen
, “
Undesirable effects as a result of short-term exposure to an ultrasonic repellent device. Part II—Exposure of volunteers
,” Assignment No. DGS/PB_PP/IVC/13026 from the Federal Public Service in Belgium for Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment (July 28,
2014
).
10.
Health Effects of Ultrasound in Air
(2017), website https://sites.google.com/site/hefua2/ (Last viewed October 30,
2017
).
11.
Health Effects of Ultrasound in Air
(2017) website https://www.southampton.ac.uk/populationhealth/partners/HEFUA.page (Last viewed October 30,
2017
).
12.
BS EN 61672-1:2013
. “
Electroacoustics—Sound level meters—Part 1: Specifications
” (British Standards Institute, London) (
2013
).
13.
See supplementary material at https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5063811 for the raw measurement data.

Supplementary Material

You do not currently have access to this content.