In realistic listening environments, speech perception requires grouping together audible fragments of speech, filling in missing information, and segregating the glimpsed target from the background. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which age-related difficulties with these tasks can be explained by declines in glimpsing, phonemic restoration, and/or speech segregation. Younger and older adults with normal hearing listened to sentences interrupted with silence or envelope-modulated noise, presented either in quiet or with a competing talker. Older adults were poorer than younger adults at recognizing keywords based on short glimpses but benefited more when envelope-modulated noise filled silent intervals. Recognition declined with a competing talker but this effect did not interact with age. Results of cognitive tasks indicated that faster processing speed and better visual-linguistic closure were predictive of better speech understanding. Taken together, these results suggest that age-related declines in speech recognition may be partially explained by difficulty grouping short glimpses of speech into a coherent message.

1.
ANSI
(
2010
). ANSI/ASA S3.6-2010,
American National Standard Specification for Audiometers
(
American National Standards Institute
,
New York)
.
2.
Baltes
,
P. B.
(
1993
). “
The aging mind: Potential and limits
,”
Gerontologist
33
,
580
594
.
3.
Bashford
,
J. A.
, Jr.
,
Meyers
,
M. D.
,
Brubaker
,
B. S.
, and
Warren
,
R. M.
(
1988
). “
Illusory continuity of interrupted speech: Speech rate determines durational limits
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
84
,
1635
1638
.
4.
Bashford
,
J. A.
, Jr.
, and
Warren
,
R. M.
(
1987
). “
Multiple phonemic restorations follow the rules for auditory induction
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
42
,
114
121
.
5.
Bashford
,
J. A.
, Jr.
,
Warren
,
R. M.
, and
Brown
,
C. A.
(
1996
). “
Use of speech-modulated noise adds strong ‘bottom-up’ cues for phonemic restoration
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
58
,
342
350
.
6.
Başkent
,
D.
(
2010
). “
Phonemic restoration in sensorineural hearing loss does not depend on baseline speech perception scores
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am
128
,
EL169
EL174
.
7.
Başkent
,
D.
,
Eiler
,
C. L.
, and
Edwards
,
B.
(
2010
). “
Phonemic restoration by hearing-impaired listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss
,”
Hear. Res.
260
,
54
62
.
8.
Bates
,
D.
,
Maechler
,
M.
,
Bolker
,
B.
, and
Walker
,
S.
(
2015
). “
Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4
,”
J. Stat. Softw.
67
,
1
48
.
9.
Benard
,
M. R.
,
Mensink
,
J. S.
, and
Başkent
,
D.
(
2014
). “
Individual differences in top-down restoration of interrupted speech: Links to linguistic and cognitive abilities
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
135
,
EL88
EL94
.
10.
Ben-David
,
B. M.
,
Tse
,
V. Y.
, and
Schneider
,
B. A.
(
2012
). “
Does it take older adults longer than younger adults to perceptually segregate a speech target from a background masker?
,”
Hear. Res.
290
,
55
63
.
11.
Bregman
,
A. S.
(
1990
).
Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound
(
MIT Press
,
Cambridge, MA)
, pp.
1
705
.
12.
Brungart
,
D. S.
(
2001
). “
Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
,
1101
1109
.
13.
Brysbaert
,
M.
, and
New
,
B.
(
2009
). “
Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English
,”
Behav. Res. Methods.
41
,
977
990
.
14.
Clark
,
H. H.
(
1973
). “
The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research
,”
J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav.
12
,
335
359
.
15.
Cluff
,
M. S.
, and
Luce
,
P. A.
(
1990
). “
Similarity neighborhoods of spoken two-syllable words: Retroactive effects on multiple activation
,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.
16
,
551
563
.
16.
Cole
,
R. A.
, and
Perfetti
,
C. A.
(
1980
). “
Listening for mispronunciations in a children's story: The use of context by children and adults
,”
J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav.
19
,
297
315
.
17.
Cooke
,
M.
(
2006
). “
A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
119
,
1562
1573
.
18.
Daneman
,
M.
, and
Carpenter
,
P. A.
(
1980
). “
Individual differences in working memory and reading
,”
J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav.
19
,
450
466
.
19.
DeCaro
,
R.
,
Peelle
,
J. E.
,
Grossman
,
M.
, and
Wingfield
,
A.
(
2016
). “
The two sides of sensory-cognitive interactions: Effects of age, hearing acuity, and working memory span on sentence comprehension
,”
Front. Psychol.
7
,
236
.
20.
Dirks
,
D. D.
,
Bell
,
T. S.
,
Rossman
,
R. N.
, and
Kincaid
,
G. E.
(
1986
). “
Articulation index predictions of contextually dependent words
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
80
,
82
92
.
21.
Dubno
,
J. R.
,
Horwitz
,
A. R.
, and
Ahlstrom
,
J. B.
(
2002
). “
Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
111
,
2897
2907
.
22.
Dubno
,
J. R.
,
Horwitz
,
A. R.
, and
Ahlstrom
,
J. B.
(
2003
). “
Recovery from prior stimulation: Masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
113
,
2084
2094
.
23.
Durlach
,
N. I.
,
Mason
,
C. R.
,
Kidd
,
G.
,
Arbogast
,
T. L.
,
Colburn
,
S.
, and
Shinn-Cunningham
,
B. G.
(
2003
). “
Note on informational masking (L)
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
113
,
2984
2987
.
24.
Eisenberg
,
L. S.
,
Dirks
,
D. D.
, and
Bell
,
T. S.
(
1995
). “
Speech recognition in amplitude-modulated noise of listeners with normal and listeners with impaired hearing
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
38
,
222
233
.
25.
Ezzatian
,
P.
,
Li
,
L.
,
Pichora-Fuller
,
K.
, and
Schneider
,
B. A.
(
2015
). “
Delayed stream segregation in older adults: More than just informational masking
,”
Ear Hear.
36
,
482
484
.
26.
Festen
,
J. M.
, and
Plomp
,
R.
(
1990
). “
Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
88
,
1725
1736
.
27.
Fitzgibbons
,
P. J.
, and
Gordon-Salant
,
S.
(
1987
). “
Temporal gap resolution in listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
81
,
133
137
.
28.
Fitzgibbons
,
P. J.
, and
Gordon-Salant
,
S.
(
1994
). “
Age effects on measures of auditory duration discrimination
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
37
,
662
670
.
29.
Fitzgibbons
,
P. J.
, and
Gordon Salant
,
S.
(
1995
). “
Age effects on duration discrimination with simple and complex stimuli
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
98
,
3140
3145
.
30.
Fitzgibbons
,
P. J.
, and
Gordon Salant
,
S.
(
1996
). “
Auditory temporal processing in elderly listeners
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol.
7
,
183
189
.
31.
Fitzgibbons
,
P. J.
, and
Gordon Salant
,
S.
(
2001
). “
Aging and temporal discrimination in auditory sequences
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
,
2955
2963
.
32.
Folstein
,
M. F.
,
Folstein
,
S. E.
, and
McHugh
,
P. R.
(
1975
). “ 
‘Mini-mental state.’ A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician
,”
J. Psychiatr. Res.
12
,
189
198
.
33.
Füllgrabe
,
C.
,
Moore
,
B. C.
, and
Stone
,
M. A.
(
2015
). “
Age-group differences in speech identification despite matched audiometrically normal hearing: Contributions from auditory temporal processing and cognition
,”
Front. Aging. Neurosci.
6
,
347
.
34.
Garofolo
,
J. S.
,
Lamel
,
L. F.
,
Fisher
,
W. M.
,
Fiscus
,
J. G.
,
Pallett
,
D. S.
, and
Dahlgren
,
N. L.
(
1993
). “
DARPA TIMIT acoustic-phonetic continuous speech corpus CDROM
,” Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia.
35.
George
,
E. L. H.
,
Zekveld
,
A. A.
,
Kramer
,
S. E.
,
Goverts
,
S. T.
,
Festen
,
J. M.
, and
Houtgast
,
T.
(
2007
). “
Auditory and nonauditory factors affecting speech reception in noise by older listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
121
,
2362
2375
.
36.
Gilbert
,
G.
,
Bergeras
,
I.
,
Voillery
,
D.
, and
Lorenzi
,
C.
(
2007
). “
Effects of periodic interruptions on the intelligibility of speech based on temporal fine-structure or envelope cues
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
122
,
1336
1339
.
37.
Gilbert
,
J. L.
,
Tamati
,
T. N.
, and
Pisoni
,
D. B.
(
2013
). “
Development, reliability, and validity of PRESTO: A new high-variability sentence recognition test
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol.
24
,
26
36
.
38.
Gordon-Salant
,
S.
, and
Cole
,
S. S.
(
2016
). “
Effects of age and working memory capacity on speech recognition performance in noise among listeners with normal hearing
,”
Ear Hear.
37
,
593
602
.
39.
Gordon-Salant
,
S.
, and
Fitzgibbons
,
P. J.
(
1993
). “
Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
36
,
1276
1285
.
40.
Gordon-Salant
,
S.
,
Yeni-Komshian
,
G. H.
,
Fitzgibbons
,
P. J.
, and
Barrett
,
J.
(
2006
). “
Age-related differences in identification and discrimination of temporal cues in speech segments
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
119
,
2455
2466
.
41.
Helfer
,
K. S.
, and
Freyman
,
R. L.
(
2008
). “
Aging and speech-on-speech masking
,”
Ear Hear.
29
,
87
98
.
42.
Helfer
,
K. S.
, and
Freyman
,
R. L.
(
2009
). “
Lexical and indexical cues in masking by competing speech
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
125
,
447
456
.
43.
Hinkle
,
D. E.
,
Wiersma
,
W.
, and
Jurs
,
S. G.
(
2003
).
Applied Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
, 5th ed. (
Houghton Mifflin
,
Boston
).
44.
Hofmann
,
D. A.
(
1997
). “
An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models
,”
J. Manage.
23
,
723
744
.
45.
Humes
,
L. E.
,
Kidd
,
G. R.
, and
Lentz
,
J. J.
(
2013
). “
Auditory and cognitive factors underlying individual differences in aided speech-understanding among older adults
,”
Front. Syst. Neurosci.
7
,
1
16
.
46.
Humes
,
L. E.
,
Kidd
,
G. R.
, and
Lentz
,
J. J.
(
2016
). “
Corrigendum: Auditory and cognitive factors underlying individual differences in aided speech-understanding among older adults
,”
Front. Syst. Neurosci.
10
,
1
.
47.
Humes
,
L. E.
,
Watson
,
B. U.
,
Christensen
,
L. A.
,
Cokely
,
C. G.
,
Halling
,
D. C.
, and
Lee
,
L.
(
1994
). “
Factors associated with individual differences in clinical measures of speech recognition among the elderly
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
37
,
465
474
.
48.
Jaekel
,
B. N.
,
Newman
,
R. S.
, and
Groupell
,
M. J.
(
2018
). “
Age effects on perceptual restoration of degraded interrupted sentences
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
143
,
84
97
.
49.
Jin
,
S. H.
, and
Nelson
,
P. B.
(
2006
). “
Speech perception in gated noise: The effects of temporal resolution
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
119
,
3097
3108
.
50.
Jin
,
S. H.
, and
Nelson
,
P. B.
(
2010
). “
Interrupted speech perception: The effects of hearing sensitivity and frequency resolution
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
128
,
881
889
.
51.
Kidd
,
G.
, Jr.
,
Arbogast
,
T. L.
,
Mason
,
C. R.
, and
Gallun
,
F. J.
(
2005
). “
The advantage of knowing where to listen
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
118
,
3804
3815
.
52.
Kidd
,
G. R.
, and
Humes
,
L. E.
(
2012
). “
Effects of age and hearing loss on the recognition of interrupted words in isolation and in sentences
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
131
,
1434
1448
.
53.
Krull
,
V.
,
Humes
,
L. E.
, and
Kidd
,
G. R.
(
2013
). “
Reconstructing wholes from parts: Effects of modality, age, and hearing loss on word recognition
,”
Ear Hear.
34
,
e14
e23
.
54.
Kwon
,
B. J.
(
2012
). “
Token (version 1.36) [computer program]
,” available at auditorypro.com/aux/ (Last viewed 5 September 2012).
55.
Lee
,
J. H.
, and
Humes
,
L. E.
(
2012
). “
Effect of fundamental-frequency and sentence-onset differences on speech-identification performance of young and older adults in a competing-talker background
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
132
,
1700
1717
.
56.
Miller
,
G. A.
, and
Licklder
,
J. C. R.
(
1950
). “
The intelligibility of interrupted speech
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
22
,
167
173
.
57.
Molis
,
M. R.
,
Kampel
,
S. D.
,
McMillan
,
G. P.
,
Gallun
,
F. J.
,
Dann
,
S. M.
, and
Konrad-Martin
,
D.
(
2015
). “
Effects of hearing and aging on sentence-level time-gated word recognition
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
52
,
481
496
.
58.
Moore
,
B. C.
(
1990
). “
Co-modulation masking release: Spectro-temporal pattern analysis in hearing
,”
Br. J. Audiol.
24
,
131
137
.
59.
Moore
,
B. C.
(
2003
). “
Temporal integration and context effects in hearing
,”
J. Phon.
31
,
563
574
.
60.
Murdock
,
B. B.
, Jr.
(
1968
). “
Serial order effects in short-term memory
,”
J. Exp. Psychol.
76
,
1
15
.
61.
Pichora-Fuller
,
M. K.
(
2008
). “
Use of supportive context by younger and older adult listeners: Balancing bottom-up and top-down information processing
,”
Int. J. Audiol.
47
,
S72
S82
.
62.
Pichora-Fuller
,
M. K.
,
Schneider
,
B. A.
, and
Daneman
,
M.
(
1995
). “
How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
97
,
1197
1205
.
63.
Powers
,
G. L.
, and
Wilcox
,
J. C.
(
1977
). “
Intelligibility of temporally interrupted speech with and without intervening noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
61
,
195
199
.
64.
Rajan
,
R.
, and
Cainer
,
K. E.
(
2008
). “
Ageing without hearing loss or cognitive impairment causes a decrease in speech intelligibility only in informational maskers
,”
Neuroscience
154
,
784
795
.
65.
R Development Core Team
(
2016
). “
R: A language and environment for statistical computing
,” R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, available at http://www.R-project.org (Last viewed 21 June 2018).
66.
Rönnberg
,
J.
(
1990
). “
Cognitive and communicative function: The effects of chronological age and ‘handicap age,’
 ”
Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol.
2
,
253
273
.
67.
Saija
,
J. D.
,
Akyurek
,
E. G.
,
Andringa
,
T. C.
, and
Başkent
,
D.
(
2014
). “
Perceptual restoration of degraded speech is preserved with advancing age
,”
J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.
15
,
139
148
.
68.
Salthouse
,
T. A.
(
2000
). “
Aging and measures of processing speed
,”
Biol. Psychol.
54
,
35
54
.
69.
Shafiro
,
V.
,
Sheft
,
S.
, and
Risley
,
R.
(
2016
). “
The intelligibility of interrupted and temporally altered speech: Effects of context, age, and hearing loss
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
139
,
455
465
.
70.
Shafiro
,
V.
,
Sheft
,
S.
,
Risley
,
R.
, and
Gygi
,
B.
(
2015
). “
Effects of age and hearing loss on the intelligibility of interrupted speech
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
137
,
745
756
.
71.
Shinn-Cunningham
,
B. G.
(
2008
). “
Object-based auditory and visual attention
,”
Trends Cogn. Sci.
12
,
182
186
.
72.
Shinn-Cunningham
,
B. G.
, and
Wang
,
D.
(
2008
). “
Influences of auditory object formation on phonemic restoration
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
123
,
295
301
.
73.
Simpson
,
A. N.
,
Matthews
,
L. J.
, and
Dubno
,
J. R.
(
2013
). “
Lipid and C-reactive protein levels as risk factors for hearing loss in older adults
,”
Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.
148
,
664
670
.
74.
Srinivasan
,
S.
, and
Wang
,
D.
(
2005
). “
A schema-based model for phonemic restoration
,”
Speech Commun.
45
,
63
87
.
75.
Stroop
,
J. R.
(
1935
). “
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
,”
J. Exp. Psychol.
18
,
643
662
.
76.
Studebaker
,
G. A.
(
1985
). “
A ‘rationalized’ arcsine transform
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
28
,
455
462
.
77.
Surprenant
,
A. M.
,
Pitt
,
M. A.
, and
Crowder
,
R. G.
(
1993
). “
Auditory recency in immediate memory
,”
Q. J. Psychol. A
46
,
193
223
.
78.
Takahashi
,
G. A.
, and
Bacon
,
S. P.
(
1992
). “
Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
35
,
1410
1421
.
79.
Tiffin
,
J.
, and
Asher
,
E. J.
(
1948
). “
The Purdue Pegboard: Norms and studies of reliability and validity
,”
J. Appl. Psychol.
32
,
234
247
.
80.
Tombaugh
,
T. N.
, and
McIntyre
,
N. J.
(
1992
). “
The mini-mental state examination: A comprehensive review
,”
J. Am. Geriatr. Soc.
40
,
922
935
.
81.
Trenerry
,
M. R.
,
Crosson
,
B.
,
DeBoe
,
J.
, and
Leber
,
W. R.
(
1989
).
The Stroop Neuropsychological Screening Test
(
Psychological Assessment Resources
,
Odessa, FL
).
82.
Tun
,
P. A.
,
O'Kane
,
G.
, and
Wingfield
,
A.
(
2002
). “
Distraction by competing speech in young and older adult listeners
,”
Psychol. Aging
17
,
453
467
.
83.
Vaden
,
K. I.
,
Halpin
,
H. R.
, and
Hickok
,
G. S.
(
2009
). “
Irvine Phonotactic Online Dictionary, version 2.0
,” available at http://www.iphod.com (Last viewed 27 September 2017).
84.
Verhaeghen
,
P.
(
2003
). “
Aging and vocabulary scores: A meta-analysis
,”
Psychol. Aging
18
,
332
339
.
85.
Verschuure
,
J.
, and
Brocaar
,
M. P.
(
1983
). “
Intelligibility of interrupted meaningful and nonsense speech with and without intervening noise
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
33
,
232
240
.
86.
Versfeld
,
N. J.
,
Daalder
,
L.
,
Festen
,
J. M.
, and
Houtgast
,
T.
(
2000
). “
Method for the selection of sentence materials for efficient measurement of the speech reception threshold
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
107
,
1671
1684
.
87.
Vitevitch
,
M. S.
,
Luce
,
P. A.
,
Pisoni
,
D. B.
, and
Auer
,
E. T.
(
1999
). “
Phonotactics, neighborhood activation, and lexical access for spoken words
,”
Brain Lang.
68
,
306
311
.
88.
Wang
,
X.
, and
Humes
,
L. E.
(
2010
). “
Factors influencing recognition of interrupted speech
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
128
,
2100
2111
.
89.
Warren
,
R. M.
(
1970
). “
Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds
,”
Science
167
,
392
393
.
90.
Zekveld
,
A. A.
,
George
,
E. L.
,
Kramer
,
S. E.
,
Goverts
,
S. T.
, and
Houtgast
,
T.
(
2007
). “
The development of the text reception threshold test: A visual analogue of the speech reception threshold test
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
50
,
576
584
.
You do not currently have access to this content.