This study aims at validating an experimental method for characterizing the vibration behavior of panels excited by a turbulent boundary layer (TBL) excitation as a possible alternative to standard means like wind tunnels or in situ tests. The approach takes advantage of an explicit separation of the excitation contribution from the dynamic behavior of the panel. Based on the measurement of deterministic transfer functions on the panel, called “sensitivity functions,” which are then combined with either measurements or a model of the wall-pressure fluctuations induced by the TBL excitation, the vibration response under such an excitation can be retrieved. For validation purposes, the wall-pressure fluctuations of the turbulent flow generated in an anechoic wind tunnel are measured with a flush-mounted microphone array. The decay rates and the convection velocity, which mainly characterize the excitation, are extracted from these measurements. The plate velocity response to this excitation is estimated following the proposed method using the measured sensitivity functions and the model of Mellen fed with experimentally estimated decay rates and convection velocity. A comparison between a directly measured vibration auto-spectrum under the actual flow and the one predicted following the suggested method shows satisfactory agreement.

1.
M.
Aucejo
,
L.
Maxit
, and
J.-L.
Guyader
, “
Experimental simulation of turbulent boundary layer induced vibrations by using a synthetic array
,”
J. Sound Vib.
331
(
16
),
3824
3843
(
2012
).
2.
T.
Bravo
and
C.
Maury
, “
The experimental synthesis of random pressure fields: Methodology
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
120
(
5
),
2702
2711
(
2006
).
3.
T.
Bravo
and
C.
Maury
, “
A synthesis approach for reproducing the response of aircraft panels to a turbulent boundary layer excitation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
129
(
1
),
143
153
(
2011
).
4.
C.
Maury
and
T.
Bravo
, “
Focussed synthesis of a turbulent boundary layer excitation
,” in
22nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference
(
2013
), pp.
1
12
.
5.
A.
Berry
,
R.
Dia
, and
O.
Robin
, “
A wave field synthesis approach to reproduction of spatially correlated sound fields
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
131
(
2
),
1226
1239
(
2012
).
6.
O.
Robin
,
A.
Berry
, and
S.
Moreau
, “
Experimental vibroacoustic testing of plane panels using synthesized random pressure fields
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
135
(
6
),
3434
3445
(
2014
).
7.
C.
Marchetto
,
L.
Maxit
,
O.
Robin
, and
A.
Berry
, “
Vibroacoustic response of panels under diffuse acoustic field excitation from sensitivity functions and reciprocity principles
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
141
(
6
),
4508
4521
(
2017
).
8.
B.
Rafaely
, “
Spatial-temporal correlation of a diffuse sound field
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
107
(
6
),
3254
3258
(
2000
).
9.
T. S.
Miller
,
J. M.
Gallman
, and
M. J.
Moeller
, “
Review of turbulent boundary layer models for acoustic analysis
,” in
49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting
(
2011
), pp.
1
20
.
10.
A.
Caiazzo
,
R.
D'Amico
, and
W.
Desmet
, “
A generalized Corcos model for modelling turbulent boundary layer wall pressure fluctuations
,”
J. Sound Vib.
372
,
192
210
(
2016
).
11.
R. H.
Mellen
, “
Wave-vector filter analysis of turbulent flow
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
95
(
3
),
1671
1673
(
1994
).
12.
C.
Maury
,
P.
Gardonio
, and
S. J.
Elliott
, “
A wavenumber approach to modelling the response of a randomly excited panel, Part 1: General theory
,”
J. Sound Vib.
252
(
1
),
83
113
(
2002
).
13.
Y. K.
Lin
,
Probabilistic Theory of Structural Dynamics
(
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
,
1967
), p.
207
.
14.
F. J.
Fahy
, “
Some applications of the reciprocity principle in experimental vibroacoustics
,”
Acoust. Phys.
49
(
2
),
217
229
(
2003
).
15.
L.
Maxit
and
V.
Denis
, “
Prediction of flow induced sound and vibration of periodically stiffened plates
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
133
(
1
),
146
160
(
2013
).
16.
M.
Unser
, “
Sampling—50 years after Shannon
,”
Proc. IEEE
88
(
4
),
569
587
(
2000
).
17.
D.
Palumbo
, “
Determining correlation and coherence lengths in turbulent boundary layer flight data
,”
J. Sound Vib.
331
,
3721
3737
(
2012
).
18.
O.
Robin
,
S.
Moreau
,
T.
Padois
, and
A.
Berry
, “
Measurement of the wavenumber-frequency spectrum of wall pressure fluctuations: Spiral-shaped rotative arrays with pinhole-mounted quarter inch microphones
,” in
19th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference
(
2013
), pp.
1
18
.
19.
B.
Arguillat
,
D.
Ricot
,
C.
Bailly
, and
G.
Robert
, “
Measured wavenumber: Frequency spectrum associated with acoustic and aerodynamic wall pressure fluctuations
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
128
(
4
),
1647
1655
(
2010
).
20.
K.
Ehrenfried
and
L.
Koop
, “
Experimental study of pressure fluctuations beneath a compressible turbulent boundary layer
,” in
14th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference
(
2008
), pp.
1
18
.
21.
O.
Robin
,
J.-D.
Chazot
,
R.
Boulandet
,
M.
Michau
,
A.
Berry
, and
N.
Atalla
, “
A plane and thin panel with representative simply supported boundary conditions for laboratory vibroacoustic test
,”
Acta Acust. Acust.
102
(
1
),
170
182
(
2016
).
22.
H. H.
Schloemer
, “
Effects of pressure gradients on turbulent-boundary-layer wall-pressure fluctuations
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
42
(
1
),
93
113
(
1967
).
23.
N.
Totaro
,
G.
Robert
, and
J. L.
Guyader
, “
Frequency averaged injected power under boundary layer excitation: An experimental validation
,”
Acta Acust. Acust.
94
(
4
),
534
547
(
2008
).
24.
L.
Maxit
, “
Simulation of the pressure field beneath a turbulent boundary layer using realizations of uncorrelated wall plane waves
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
140
(
2
),
1268
1285
(
2016
).
25.
M.
Grédiac
and
F.
Hild
,
Full-Field Measurements and Identification in Solid Mechanics
(
ISTE Ltd. and Wiley
,
London
,
2013
), Chaps. 3 and 6.
You do not currently have access to this content.