Recent literature reports that a large percentage of teachers complain that teaching has an adverse effect on their voice status. Thus, more needs to be done to study their vocal behavior. The objective of this longitudinal study was twofold: to determine changes in the voice use of teachers over a school year, and to study the relationships between voice use and classroom acoustic parameters. Thirty-one teachers from two secondary schools in Turin (Italy) were involved at the beginning of the 2014–2015 school year, and 22 of them also participated at the end of the same school year. The results show that teachers adjust their voices with noise and reverberation. A minimum value of the sound pressure level of voice (SPL) was found at a mid-frequency reverberation time of 0.8 s in both periods. Moreover, the teachers who worked in the worst classroom acoustic conditions showed an increase of 2.3 dB in the mean SPL and a decrease of 10% in the voicing time percentage at the end of the school year. A predictive model that can be used to estimate the mean SPL from the background noise level and the reverberation time, based on collected data, is here proposed.
References
1.
M.
Behlau
, F.
Zambon
, and G.
Madazio
, “Managing dysphonia in occupational voice users
,” Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.
22
(3
), 188
–194
(2014
).2.
I. R.
Titze
, J.
Lemk
, and D.
Montequin
, “Populations in the U.S: Workforce who rely on voice as a primary tool of a trade: A preliminary report
,” J. Voice
11
, 254
–259
(1997
).3.
E.
Smith
, J.
Lemke
, M.
Taylor
, H. L.
Kirchner
, and H.
Hoffman
, “Frequency of voice problems among teachers and other occupations
,” J. Voice
12
, 480
–488
(1998
).4.
P.
Godall
, C.
Gassul
, and M.
Amador
, “Epidemiological voice health map of the teaching population of Granollers (Barcelona) developed from the EVES questionnaire and the VHI
,” Logoped. Phoniatr. Vocol.
40
(4
), 171
–178
(2015
).5.
S.
Simberg
, E.
Sala
, K.
Vehmas
, and A.
Line
, “Changes in the prevalence of vocal symptoms among teachers during a twelve-year period
,” J. Voice
19
(1
), 95
–102
(2005
).6.
L. C.
Cantor Cutiva
, I.
Vogel
, and A.
Burdorf
, “Voice disorders in teachers and their associations with work-related factors: A systematic review
,” J. Commun. Disord.
46
(2
), 143
–155
(2013
).7.
J.
Vinturri
, P.
Alku
, E.
Sala
, M.
Sihvo
, and E.
Vilkman
, “Loading-related subjective symptoms during a vocal loading test with special reference to gender and some ergonomic factors
,” Folia Phoniatr. Logop.
55
(2
), 55
–59
(2003
).8.
E.
Vilkman
, “Occupational safety and health aspects of voice and speech professions
,” Folia Phoniatr. Logop.
56
(4
), 220
–253
(2004
).9.
A. M.
Laukkanen
, I.
Ilomaki
, K.
Leppanen
, and E.
Vilkman
, “Acoustic measures and self-reports of vocal fatigue by female teachers
,” J. Voice
22
(3
), 283
–289
(2008
).10.
R.
Ruekers
, E.
Bierens
, H.
Kingma
, and E. H.
Marres
, “Vocal load as measured by the voice accumulator
,” Folia Phoniatr. Logop.
45
(5
), 252
–261
(1995
).11.
S.
Whitling
, R.
Rydelland
, and V. L.
Åhlander
, “Design of a clinical vocal loading test with long-time measurement of voice
,” J. Voice
29
(2
), 261.e13
–261.e27
(2015
).12.
ISO 9921
: Ergonomics—Assessment of Speech Communication
(International Organization for Standardization
, Geneva, Switzerland
, 2003
).13.
H. A.
Cheyne
, H. M.
Hanson
, R. P.
Genereux
, K. N.
Stevens
, and R. E.
Hillman
, “Development and testing of a portable vocal accumulator
,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
46
(6
), 1457
–1467
(2003
).14.
J. G.
Švec
, I. R.
Titze
, and P. S.
Popolo
, “Estimation of sound pressure levels of voiced speech from skin vibration of the neck
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
117
(3
), 1386
–1394
(2005
).15.
D. D.
Mehta
, M.
Zañartu
, S. W.
Feng
, H. A.
Cheyne
, and R. E.
Hillman
, “Mobile voice health monitoring using a wearable accelerometer sensor and a smartphone platform
,” IEEE T. Biom. Eng.
59
(11
), 3090
–3096
(2012
).16.
L.
Rantala
, E.
Vilkman
, and R.
Bloigu
, “Voice changes during work: Subjective complaints and objective measurements for female primary and secondary school teachers
,” J. Voice
16
(3
), 344
–355
(2002
).17.
E. J.
Hunter
and I. R.
Titze
, “Variation in intensity, fundamental frequency, and voicing for teachers in occupational versus nonoccupational settings
,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
53
(4
), 862
–875
(2010
).18.
J. C.
Švec
, P. S.
Popolo
, and I. R.
Titze
, “Measurement of vocal doses in speech: Experimental procedure and signal processing
,” Logoped. Phoniatr. Vocol.
28
(4
), 181
–192
(2003
).19.
A.
Nacci
, B.
Fattori
, V.
Mancini
, E.
Panicucci
, F.
Ursino
, F. M.
Cartaino
, and S.
Berrettini
, “The use and role of the Ambulatory Phonation Monitor (APM) in voice assessment
,” Acta Otorhinolaryngol. Ital.
33
(1
), 49
–55
(2013
).20.
E.
Vilkman
, E. R.
Lauri
, P.
Alku
, E.
Sala
, and M.
Sihvo
, “Effects of prolonged oral reading on F0, SPL, subglottal pressure and amplitude characteristics of glottal flow waveforms
,” J. Voice
13
(2
), 303
–312
(1999
).21.
H.
Lane
and B.
Tranel
, “The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech
,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
14
(4
), 677
–709
(1971
).22.
H.
Lazarus
, “Prediction of verbal communication is noise—A review: Part 1
,” Appl. Acoust.
19
(6
), 439
–464
(1986
).23.
P.
Bottalico
and A.
Astolfi
, “Investigations into vocal doses and parameters pertaining to primary school teachers in classrooms
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
131
(4
), 2817
–2827
(2012
).24.
H.
Sato
and J. S.
Bradley
, “Evaluation of acoustical conditions for speech communication in working elementary school classrooms
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
123
(4
), 2064
–2077
(2008
).25.
N.
Durup
, B.
Shield
, S.
Dance
, and R.
Sullivan
, “An investigation into relationships between classroom acoustic measurements and voice parameters of teachers
,” Build. Acoust.
22
(3–4
), 225
–242
(2015
).26.
B.
Shield
, R.
Conetta
, J.
Dockrell
, D.
Connolly
, T.
Cox
, and C.
Mydlarz
, “A survey of acoustic conditions and noise levels in secondary school classrooms in England
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
137
(1
), 177
–188
(2015
).27.
E.
Sala
and L.
Rantala
, “Acoustics and activity noise in school classrooms in Finland
,” Appl. Acoust.
114
, 252
–259
(2016
).28.
P.
Lundquist
, K.
Holmberg
, and U.
Landstrom
, “Annoyance and effects on work from environmental noise at school
,” Noise Health
2
, 39
–46
(2000
).29.
Y.
Avsar
and M.
Gonullu
, “The influence of indoor acoustical parameters on student perception in classrooms
,” Noise Control Eng. J.
58
(3
), 310
–318
(2010
).30.
A.
Astolfi
and F.
Pellerey
, “Subjective and objective assessment of acoustical and overall environmental quality in secondary school classrooms
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
123
, 163
–173
(2008
).31.
A.
Brunskog
, A.
Gade
, G. P.
Ballester
, and L.
Calbo
, “Increase in voice level and speaker comfort in lecture room
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
125
(4
), 2072
–2082
(2009
).32.
D.
Pelegrín-García
, B.
Smits
, J.
Brunskog
, and C.
Joeng
, “Vocal effort with changing talker-to-listener distance in different acoustic environments
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
129
(4
), 1981
–1990
(2011
).33.
D.
Pelegrín-García
, J.
Brunskog
, V.
Lyberg-Åhlander
, and A.
Lofqvist
, “Measurement and prediction of voice support and room gain in school classrooms
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
131
(1
), 194
–204
(2012
).34.
A.
Carullo
, A.
Vallan
, and A.
Astolfi
, “Design issue for a portable vocal analyzer
,” IEEE Trans. Inst. Meas.
62
(5
), 1084
–1093
(2013
).35.
A.
Carullo
, A.
Vallan
, A.
Astolfi
, L.
Pavese
, and G. E.
Puglisi
, “Validation of calibration procedures and uncertainty estimation of contact-microphone based vocal analyzers
,” Measurement
74
, 130
–142
(2015
).36.
ANSI S3.5-1997
: Methods for Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index
(Acoustical Society of America
, New York
, 1997
).37.
BS EN ISO 3382-2
: Acoustics—Measurement of Room Acoustic Parameters—Part 2: Reverberation Time in Ordinary Rooms
(International Organization for Standardization
, Geneva, Switzerland
, 2008
).38.
DIN 18041
: Hörsamkeit in Räumen—Anforderungen, Empfehlungen und Hinweisefür die Planung (Acoustic Quality in Rooms- Specifications and Instructions for the Room Acoustic Design)
(Deutsche Institutfür Normung
, Berlin
, 2016
).39.
ISO 1996
: Acoustics—Description, Measurements and Assessment of Environmental Noise
(International Organization for Standardization
, Geneva, Switzerland
, 2016
).40.
G. E.
Puglisi
, A.
Astolfi
, A.
Carullo
, and L. C.
Cutiva
, “Assessment of indoor ambient noise level in school classrooms
,” in Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Noise Control—Euronoise
, Maastricht, the Netherlands
(May 31–June 3
, 2015
).41.
D.
Edeker
, “Generalized linear mixed models
,” in Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Sciences
, edited by B.
Everitt
and D.
Howell
, 2nd ed. (Wiley
, New York
, 2005
).42.
A.
Castellana
, A.
Carullo
, A.
Astolfi
, G. E.
Puglisi
, and U.
Fugiglando
, “Intra-speaker and inter-speaker variability in speech sound pressure level across repeated readings
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
141
(4
), 2353
–2363
(2017
).43.
P.
Bottalico
, I. I.
Passione
, S.
Graetzer
, and E. J.
Hunter
, “Evaluation of the starting point of the Lombard effect
,” Acta Acust. Acoust.
103
, 169
–172
(2017
).44.
G. E.
Puglisi
, A.
Astolfi
, L. C.
Cutiva
, and A.
Carullo
, “Four-day-follow-up study on the voice monitoring of primary school teachers: Relationships with conversational task and classroom acoustics
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
141
, 441
–452
(2017
).45.
L.
Nijs
and M.
Rychtarikova
, “Calculating the optimum reverberation time and absorption coefficient for good speech intelligibility in classroom design using U50
,” Acta Acust. Acust.
97
, 93
–102
(2011
).46.
W.
Yang
and J. S.
Bradley
, “Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
125
(2
), 922
–933
(2009
).47.
WSP, “
Acoustic Design in Schools: Performance Standards Building Bulletin
,” Bullletin BB93 (Department for Education and the Educational Funding Agency, London, 2015
).48.
French Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable Development
, Circulaire du 25 avril 2003 Relative à L'applicationde la Règlementation Acoustique des Bâtiments Autres Qued'habitation (Circular of 25 April 2003 Relative to the Application of Acoustic Regulation for Buildings Other Than Apartment Buildings)
(French Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable Development
, Paris, France
, 2003
).49.
UNI 11367
: Acustica in Edilizia. Classificazione Acustica Delle Unità Immobiliari. Procedura di Valutazione e Verifica in Opera (Building Acoustics. Acoustic Classification of Building Units. Evaluation Procedure and In Situ Measurements)
(EU GPP
, Brussels, Belgium
, 2016
).© 2017 Acoustical Society of America.
2017
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.
