Rate manipulations can be used to study adaptation processes in the auditory nerve and brainstem. For this reason, rate effects on the click-evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) have been investigated in many mammals, including humans. In this study, click-evoked ABRs were obtained in eight bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) while varying stimulus rate using both conventional averaging and maximum length sequences (MLSs), which allow disentangling ABRs that overlap in time and thus permit the study of adaptation at high rates. Dolphins varied in age and upper cutoff frequency of hearing. Conventional stimulation rates were 25, 50, and 100 Hz and average MLS rates were approximately 50, 100, 250, 500, 1000, 2500, and 5000 Hz. Click peak-equivalent sound pressure levels for all conditions were 135 dB re 1 μPa. ABRs were observed in all dolphins, at all stimulus rates. With increasing rate, peak latencies increased and peak amplitudes decreased. There was a trend for an increase in the interwave intervals with increasing rate, which appeared more robust for the dolphins with a full range of hearing. For those rates where ABRs were obtained for both conventional and MLS approaches, the latencies of the mean data were in good agreement.

1.
Buchwald
,
J.
, and
Huang
,
C. M.
(
1975
). “
Far-field acoustic response: Origins in the cat
,”
Science
189
,
382
384
.
2.
Burkard
,
R.
(
1994
). “
Gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked responses to maximum length sequences
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
95
,
2126
2135
.
3.
Burkard
,
R.
, and
Hecox
,
K.
(
1983
). “
The effect of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory evoked response. I. Rate and intensity effects
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
74
,
1204
1224
.
4.
Burkard
,
R.
, and
Hecox
,
K. E.
(
1987
). “
The effect of broadband noise on the human brain-stem auditory evoked response. IV. Additivity of forward-masking and rate-induced wave V latency shifts
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
81
,
1064
1072
.
5.
Burkard
,
R.
,
Jones
,
S.
, and
Jones
,
T.
(
1994
). “
Conventional and cross-correlation brain-stem auditory evoked responses in the white leghorn chick: Rate manipulations
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
95
,
2136
2144
.
6.
Burkard
,
R.
,
Shi
,
Y.
, and
Hecox
,
K. E.
(
1990
). “
A comparison of maximum length and Legendre sequences for the derivation of brain-stem auditory-evoked responses at rapid rates of stimulation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
87
,
1656
1664
.
7.
Burkard
,
R.
, and
Voigt
,
H. F.
(
1989
). “
Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). I: Effects of click level, rate, and polarity
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
85
,
2514
2525
.
8.
Burkard
,
R.
, and
Voigt
,
H. F.
(
1990
). “
Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). III: Additivity of click level and rate with noise level
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
88
,
2222
2234
.
9.
Burkard
,
R. F.
,
McGee
,
J.
, and
Walsh
,
E.
(
1996a
). “
Effects of stimulus rate on the feline brain-stem auditory evoked response during development. II. Peak amplitudes
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
100
,
991
1002
.
10.
Burkard
,
R. F.
,
McGee
,
J.
, and
Walsh
,
E. J.
(
1996b
). “
Effects of stimulus rate on the feline brain-stem auditory evoked response during development. I. Peak latencies
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
100
,
978
990
.
11.
Burkard
,
R. F.
, and
Sims
,
D.
(
2001
). “
The human auditory brainstem response to high click rates: Aging effects
,”
Am. J. Audiol.
10
,
53
61
.
12.
Delgado
,
R. E.
, and
Ozdamar
,
O.
(
2004
). “
Deconvolution of evoked responses obtained at high stimulus rates
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
115
,
1242
1251
.
13.
Eysholdt
,
U.
, and
Schreiner
,
C.
(
1982
). “
Maximum length sequences—A fast method for measuring brain-stem-evoked responses
,”
Audiology
21
,
242
250
.
14.
Finneran
,
J. J.
,
Mulsow
,
J.
,
Houser
,
D. S.
, and
Burkard
,
R. F.
(
2016
). “
Place specificity of the click-evoked auditory brainstem response in the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus)
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
140
,
2593
2602
.
15.
GraphPad Software
(
2014
). “
GraphPad Prism (Version 6) [computer software]
,” (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).
16.
Jewett
,
D. L.
,
Caplovitz
,
G.
,
Baird
,
B.
,
Trumpis
,
M.
,
Olson
,
M. P.
, and
Larson-Prior
,
L. J.
(
2004
). “
The use of QSD (q-sequence deconvolution) to recover superposed, transient evoked-responses
,”
Clin. Neurophysiol
115
,
2754
2775
.
17.
Jewett
,
D. L.
, and
Williston
,
J. S.
(
1971
). “
Auditory-evoked far fields averaged from the scalp of humans
,”
Brain
94
,
681
696
.
18.
Møller
,
A.
(
1994
). “
Neural generators of auditory evoked potentials
,” in
Principles & Applications in Auditory Evoked Potentials
, edited by
J.
Jacobson
(
Alllyn and Bacon
,
Boston
), pp.
23
46
.
19.
Mulsow
,
J.
,
Finneran
,
J. J.
,
Houser
,
D. S.
, and
Burkard
,
R. F.
(
2016
). “
The effects of click and masker spectrum on the auditory brainstem response of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
140
,
2603
2613
.
20.
Ozdamar
,
O.
, and
Bohórquez
,
J.
(
2006
). “
Signal-to-noise ratio and frequency analysis of continuous loop averaging deconvolution (CLAD) of overlapping evoked potentials
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
119
,
429
438
.
21.
Popov
,
V.
, and
Supin
,
A. Y.
(
1990a
). “
Electrophysiological studies of hearing in some cetaceans and a manatee
,” in
Sensory Abilities in Cetaceans
, edited by
J. A.
Thomas
and
R. A.
Kastelein
(
Plenum
,
New York
), pp.
405
415
.
22.
Popov
,
V. V.
, and
Supin
,
A. Y.
(
1990b
). “
Auditory brain stem responses in characterization of dolphin hearing
,”
J. Comp. Physiol. A
166
,
385
393
.
23.
Ridgway
,
S. H.
,
Bullock
,
T. H.
,
Carder
,
D. A.
,
Seeley
,
R. L.
,
Woods
,
D.
, and
Galambos
,
R.
(
1981
). “
Auditory brainstem response in dolphins
,”
Neurobiology
78
,
1943
1947
.
24.
Supin
,
A. Y.
, and
Popov
,
V. V.
(
1995
). “
Temporal resolution in the dolphin's auditory system revealed by double-click evoked potential study
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
97
,
2586
2593
.
25.
Valderrama
,
J. T.
,
Alvarez
,
I.
,
de la Torre
,
A.
,
Carlos Segura
,
J.
,
Sainz
,
M.
, and
Luis Vargas
,
J.
(
2012
). “
Recording of auditory brainstem response at high stimulation rates using randomized stimulation and averaging
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
132
,
3856
3865
.
You do not currently have access to this content.