The present study has investigated the occupational voice use of 27 female primary school teachers over a four-day-follow-up. Sixty-one working-day voice samples were acquired with two contact sensor-based vocal analyzers in four schools with highly different classroom acoustics. The vocal parameters were compared with a conversational task that the teachers performed before each lesson and with the measured classroom acoustic parameters. The average equivalent sound pressure level at 1 m from the mouth, which refers to the teacher's vocal effort, and the voicing time percentage were 71.2 dB [standard error (SE) 1.0 dB] and 29%, respectively. The teachers' mean voice level and fundamental frequency were significantly higher in the occupational setting than in the conversational one, which is by 5.5 dB (SE 0.5 dB) and 50 Hz (SE 3 Hz), respectively. Higher voice levels were observed for higher background noise levels, at a rate of 0.53 dB/dB, and a tendency of the background noise to increase with increasing reverberation time was observed at a rate of 13 dB/s. An optimal reverberation time of 0.7 s was found to minimize the voice level, since teachers raised their voice at lower and higher reverberation times, the latter presumably due to higher background noise levels.
References
1.
E.
Vilkman
, “Voice problems at work: A challenge for occupational safety and health arrangement
,” Folia Phoniatr. Logop.
52
, 120
–125
(2000
).2.
N. R.
Williams
, “Occupational groups at risk of voice disorders: A review of the literature
,” Occupational Med.
53
, 456
–460
(2003
).3.
A.
Astolfi
, P.
Bottalico
, A.
Accornero
, M.
Garzaro
, J.
Nadalin
, and C.
Giordano
, “Relationship between vocal doses and voice disorders on primary school teachers
,” in Proceedings of 9th Conference on Noise Control - Euronoise
, Prague, Czech Republic
(June 10–13, 2012
).4.
B.
Fritzell
, “Voice disorders and occupations
,” Log. Phon. Vocol.
21
, 7
–12
(1996
).5.
I. R.
Titze
, J.
Lemke
, and D.
Montequin
, “Populations in the U.S. workforce who rely on voice as a primary tool of trade: A preliminary report
,” J. Voice
11
(3
), 254
–259
(1996
).6.
National Center for Education Statistics
, “Digest of Education Statistics: 2013
,” http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d13/tables/dt13_208.20.asp (Last viewed February 15, 2016
).7.
H. A.
Cheyne
, H. M.
Hanson
, R. P.
Genereux
, K. N.
Stevens
, and R. E.
Hillman
, “Development and testing of a portable vocal accumulator
,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
46
(6
), 1457
–1467
(2003
).8.
J. G.
Švec
, I. R.
Titze
, and P. S.
Popolo
, “Estimation of sound pressure levels of voiced speech from skin vibration of the neck
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
117
(3
), 1386
–1394
(2005
).9.
D. D.
Mehta
, M.
Zañartu
, S. W.
Feng
, H. A.
Cheyne
, and R. E.
Hillman
, “Mobile voice health monitoring using a wearable accelerometer sensor and a smartphone platform
,” IEEE T. Biom. Eng.
59
(11
), 3090
–3096
(2012
).10.
C. S.
Gaskill
, S. G.
O'Brien
, and S. R.
Tinter
, “The effect of voice amplification on occupational vocal dose in elementary school teachers
,” J. Voice
26
(5
), 19
–27
(2012
).11.
E. J.
Hunter
and I. R.
Titze
, “Variations in intensity, fundamental frequency, and voicing for teachers in occupational versus nonoccupational settings
,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
53
, 862
–875
(2010
).12.
L. C.
Cantor Cutiva
, G. E.
Puglisi
, A.
Astolfi
, and A.
Carullo
, “Four-day-follow-up study on the self-reported voice condition and noise condition of teachers: Relationship between vocal parameters and classroom acoustics
,” J. Voice
31
(1), 120.e1
–120.e8
(2016
).13.
H.
Lane
and B.
Tranel
, “The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech
,” J. Speech Hear. Res.
14
(4
), 677
–709
(1971
).14.
A.
Astolfi
, A.
Carullo
, L.
Pavese
, and G. E.
Puglisi
, “Duration of voicing and silence periods of continuous speech in different acoustic environments
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
137
(2
), 565
–579
(2015
).15.
P.
Bottalico
, A.
Astolfi
, S.
Graetzer
, and E. J.
Hunter
, “Silence and voicing accumulations in primary school teachers with and without voice disorders
,” J. Voice in press (2016).16.
A.
Astolfi
, G. E.
Puglisi
, L. C. Cantor
Cutiva
, L.
Pavese
, A.
Carullo
, and A.
Burdorf
, “Associations between objectively-measured acoustic parameters and occupational voice use among primary school teachers
,” Energy Procedia
78
, 3422
–3427
(2015
).17.
B.
Shield
and J. E.
Dockrell
, “The effects of environmental and classroom noise on the academic attainments of primary school children
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
123
(1
), 133
–144
(2007
).18.
P.
Bottalico
and A.
Astolfi
, “Investigations into vocal doses and parameters pertaining to primary school teachers in classrooms
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
131
(4
), 2817
–2827
(2012
).19.
H.
Sato
and J. S.
Bradley
, “Evaluation of acoustical conditions for speech communication in working elementary school classrooms
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
123
(4
), 2064
–2077
(2008
).20.
N.
Durup
, B.
Shield
, S.
Dance
, and R.
Sullivan
, “An investigation into relationships between classroom acoustic measurements and voice parameters of teachers
,” Build. Acoust.
22
(3+4
), 225
–242
(2015
).21.
D.
Pelegrín-García
, B.
Smits
, J.
Brunskog
, and C.
Jeong
, “Vocal effort with changing talker-to-listener distance in different acoustic environments
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
129
(4
), 1981
–1990
(2011
).22.
H.
Lazarus
, “Prediction of verbal communication in noise—A review: Part 1
,” Appl. Acoust.
19
, 439
–463
(1986
).23.
J.
Brunskog
, A. C.
Gade
, G. P.
Bellester
, and L. R.
Calbo
, “Increase in voice level and speaker comfort in lecture rooms
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
125
(4
), 2072
–2082
(2009
).24.
D.
Pelegrín-García
, “Comment on ‘Increase in voice level and speaker comfort in lecture rooms,’
” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
129
(3
), 1161
–1164
(2011
).25.
D.
Pelegrín-García
, O.
Fuentes-Mendizàbal
, J.
Brunskog
, and C.
Jeong
, “Equal autophonic level curves under different room acoustics conditions
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
130
(1
), 228
–238
(2011
).26.
V.
Lyberg-Åhlander
, R.
Rydell
, A.
Löfqvist
, D.
Pelegrín-García
, and J.
Brunskog
, “Part Summary of the project ‘Speakers’ Comfort': Teachers' voice use in teaching environments
,” Build. Acoust.
22
(3+4
), 209
–224
(2015
).27.
D.
Pelegrín-García
, J.
Brunskog
, and B.
Rasmussen
, “Speaker-oriented classroom acoustics design guidelines in the context of current regulations in European countries
,” Acta Acust. Acust.
100
, 1073
–1089
(2014
).28.
A.
Astolfi
, V.
Corrado
, and A.
Griginis
, “Comparison between measured and calculated parameters for the acoustical characterization of small classrooms
,” Appl. Acoust.
69
, 966
–976
(2008
).29.
BS EN ISO 3382-2
: Acoustics - Measurement of Room Acoustic Parameters – Part 2: Reverberation Time in Ordinary Rooms
(International Organization for Standardization
, Genève, Switzerland
, 2008
).30.
DIN 18041
: Hörsamkeit in kleinen bis mittelgroßen Räumen (Acoustical Quality in Small to Medium-Sized Rooms)
(Deutsche Institut für Normung
, Berlin, Germany
, 2004
).31.
D.
Pelegrín-García
and J.
Brunskog
, “Speakers' comfort and voice level variation in classrooms: Laboratory research
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
132
(1
), 249
–260
(2012
).32.
D.
Pelegrín-García
, J.
Brunskog
, V.
Lyberg-Åhlander
, and A.
Lofqvist
, “Measurement and prediction of voice support and room gain in school classrooms
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
131
(1
), 194
–204
(2012
).33.
A.
Carullo
, A.
Vallan
, and A.
Astolfi
, “Design issues for a portable vocal analyzer
,” IEEE T. Instrum. Meas.
62
(5
), 1084
–1093
(2013
).34.
A.
Carullo
, A.
Vallan
, A.
Astolfi
, L.
Pavese
, and G. E.
Puglisi
, “Validation of calibration procedures and uncertainty estimation of contact-microphone based vocal analyzers
,” Measurement
74
, 130
–142
(2015
).35.
A.
Carullo
, A.
Penna
, A.
Vallan
, A.
Astolfi
, L.
Pavese
, and G. E.
Puglisi
, “Traceability and uncertainty of vocal parameters estimated through a contact microphone
,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications
, Lisbon, Portugal
(June 11–12, 2014
).36.
A.
Nacci
, B.
Fattori
, V.
Mancini
, E.
Panicucci
, F.
Ursino
, F. M.
Cartaino
, and S.
Berrettini
, “The use and role of the Ambulatory Phonation Monitor (APM) in voice assessment
,” Acta Otorhinolaryngol. Ital.
33
(1
), 49
–55
(2013
).37.
ANSI S3.5
: Methods for Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index
(Acoustical Society of America
, New York
, 1997
).38.
H. J.
Seltman
, “Experimental design and analysis – September 2015
,” http://www.stat.cmu.edu/∼hseltman/309/Book/Book.pdf, Chap. 13 (Last viewed March 7, 2016
).39.
WSP
, Acoustic Design in Schools: Performance Standards
Building Bulletin, BB93 (Department for Education and the Educational Funding Agency
, London
, 2015
).40.
B.
Shield
and J. E.
Dockrell
, “External and internal noise surveys of London primary schools
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
115
(2
), 730
–738
(2004
).41.
M.
Cooke
, S.
King
, M.
Garnier
, and V.
Aubanel
, “The listening talker: A review of human and algorithmic context-induced modifications of speech
,” Comput. Speech Lang.
28
(2
), 543
–571
(2014
).42.
K. K.
Baker
, L. O.
Ramig
, S.
Sapir
, E. S.
Luschei
, and M. E.
Smith
, “Control of vocal loudness in young and old adults
,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
44
(2
), 297
–305
(2001
).43.
W.
Yang
and J. S.
Bradley
, “Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
125
(2
), 922
–933
(2009
).© 2017 Acoustical Society of America.
2017
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.
