Impact Insulation Class (IIC), the single-number rating for evaluating the impact noise insulation of a floor-ceiling assembly, and the associated field testing ratings, are unsatisfactory because they do not have strong correlation with subjective reaction nor provide suitable detailed information for evaluation or design of floor-ceiling assemblies. Various proposals have been made for improving the method, but the data presented indicate that no single-number rating can adequately characterize the impact noise isolation of an assembly. For realistic impact noise sources and floor-ceiling assembly types, there are two frequency domains for impact noise, and the impact noise levels in the two domains can vary independently. Therefore, two ratings are required in order to satisfactorily evaluate the impact isolation provided by a floor-ceiling assembly. Two different ratings are introduced for measuring field impact isolation in the two frequency domains, using the existing impact source and measurement method. They are named low-frequency impact rating (LIR) and high-frequency impact rating (HIR). LIR and HIR are proposed to improve the current method for design and evaluation of floor-ceiling assemblies and also provide a better method for predicting subjective reaction.
References
1.
ASTM Standard E492
, Standard Test Method for Laboratory Measurement of Impact Sound Transmission Through Floor-Ceiling Assemblies Using the Tapping Machine
(ASTM International
, West Conshohocken, PA
, 2009
).2.
ASTM Standard E989-06
, Standard Classification for Determination of Impact Insulation Class (IIC)
(ASTM International
, West Conshohocken, PA
, 2006
).3.
“Impact Noise Control in Multifamily Dwellings,”
Report No. 750 (Federal Housing Administration, Washington, DC, 1963
).4.
T.
Mariner
, “Criticism of the ISO impact-noise test
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
36
, 1024
(1964
).5.
T.
Mariner
, “Comments on impact-noise measurement
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
35
, 1453
(1963
).6.
W. E.
Blazier
and R. B.
DuPree
, “Investigation of low-frequency footfall noise in wood-frame, multifamily building construction
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
96
, 1521
–1532
(1994
).7.
B.
Rasmussen
and M.
Machimbarrena
, “COST Action TU0901—Building acoustics throughout Europe
,” in Volume 1: Towards a common framework in building acoustics throughout Europe
(COST Office Action TU0901
, Brussels, Belgium
, 2014
).8.
W.
Fasold
, “Investigation in to the shape of the criterion curve for impact noise in dwellings
,” Acustica
15
, 271
–284
(1965
).9.
D.
Olynyk
, “Assessment of footstep noise through wood-joist and concrete floors
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
43
, 730
–733
(1968
).10.
D.
Olynyk
, “Subjective judgments of footstep-noise transmission through floors
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
38
, 1035
–1039
(1965
).11.
T. J.
Schultz
, “Alternative test method for evaluating impact noise
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
60
, 645
–655
(1976
).12.
ASTM Standard E1007
, Standard Test Method for Field Measurement of Tapping Machine Impact Sound Transmission through Floor-Ceiling Assemblies and Associated Support Structures
(ASTM International
, West Conshohocken, PA
, 2013
).13.
J. J.
LoVerde
and W.
Dong
, “Field impact insulation testing: Inadequacy of existing normalization methods and proposal for new ratings analogous to those for airborne noise reduction
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
118
, 638
–646
(2005
).14.
ASTM Standard E413
, Classification for Rating Sound Insulation
(ASTM International
, West Conshohocken, PA
, 2010
).15.
T. D.
Northwood
, “Sound-insulation ratings and the new ASTM sound-transmission class
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
34
, 493
–501
(1962
).16.
J. S.
Bradley
, “Acceptable party wall sound insulation criteria
,” Can. Acoust.
29
, 56
–57
(2001
).17.
O.
Brandt
, “European experience with sound-insulation requirements
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
36
, 719
–724
(1964
).18.
V.
Belmondo
, T.
Heebink
, and F.
Brittain
, “Ranking the impact sound transmission of wood-framed floor-ceiling assemblies
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
54
, 1433
–1441
(1973
).19.
ISO 717-2 (2013)
, Acoustics—Rating of sound insulation in buildings and of building elements Part 2: Impact Sound Insulation
(International Organization for Standardization
, Geneva, Switzerland
, 2013
).20.
F.
Ljunggren
, C.
Simmons
, and K.
Hagberg
, “Correlation between sound insulation and occupants' perception—Proposal of alternative single number rating of impact sound
,” Appl. Acoust.
85
, 57
–68
(2014
).21.
J. Y.
Jeon
, P. J.
Lee
, and S.
Sato
, “Use of the standard rubber ball as an impact source with heavyweight concrete floors
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
126
, 167
–178
(2009
).22.
JIS A 1418
, Acoustics: Measurement of floor impact sound insulation of buildings Part 2: Method using standard heavy impact souces
(Japanese Standards Association
, Tokyo, Japan
, 2000
).23.
ISO 10140-5 (2010)
, Acoustics—Laboratory Measurment of Sound Insulation of Building Elements Part 5: Requirements for Test Facilities and Equipment
(International Organization for Standardization
, Geneva, Switzerland
, 2010
).24.
H.
Sato
and J.
Yoshimura
, “Classification scheme of floor impact sounds with the standard rubber ball in dwellings
,” in Proceedings of Inter-Noise 2014
(2014
), pp. 6166
–6172
.25.
Y.
Suzuki
and H.
Takeshima
, “Equal-loudness-level contours for pure tones
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
116
, 918
–933
(2004
).26.
ICC G2-2010
, Guideline for Acoustics
(International Code Council
, Washington, DC
, 2010
).27.
E.
Zwicker
, G.
Flottorp
, and S. S.
Stevens
, “Critical band width in loudness summation
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
29
, 548
–557
(1957
).28.
E.
Zwicker
, “Subdivision of the audible frequency range into critical bands (Frequenzgruppen)
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
33
, 248
(1961
).29.
T. J.
Schultz
, “Impact-noise recommendations for the FHA
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
36
, 729
–739
(1964
).30.
T.
Mariner
, “Impact-noise rating of various floors
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
41
, 206
–214
(1967
).31.
T.
Mariner
, “Technical problems in impact noise testing
,” Build. Res.
1
, 52
–60
(1964
).32.
B. G.
Watters
, “Impact-noise characteristics of female hard-heeled foot traffic
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
37
, 619
–630
(1965
).33.
H. W.
Hehmann
, “Impact-noise measurements for some floated-floor construction
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
36
, 1024
(1964
).34.
J.
LoVerde
and D. W.
Dong
, “Optimizing floor-ceiling assemblies in wood-framed multifamily buildings using a two-rating method of evaluating impact isolation
,” in Proc. ICA2016
(2016
), paper 765.35.
J. S.
Bradley
, “Acoustical measurements in some Canadian homes
,” Can. Acoust.
14
, 19
–25
(1986
).© 2017 Acoustical Society of America.
2017
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.
