Passive acoustic monitoring is a promising approach for monitoring long-term trends in harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) abundance. Before passive acoustic monitoring can be implemented to estimate harbor porpoise abundance, information about the detectability of harbor porpoise is needed to convert recorded numbers of echolocation clicks to harbor porpoise densities. In the present study, paired data from a grid of nine passive acoustic click detectors (C-PODs, Chelonia Ltd., United Kingdom) and three days of simultaneous aerial line-transect visual surveys were collected over a 370 km2 study area. The focus of the study was estimating the effective detection area of the passive acoustic sensors, which was defined as the product of the sound production rate of individual animals and the area within which those sounds are detected by the passive acoustic sensors. Visually estimated porpoise densities were used as informative priors in a Bayesian model to solve for the effective detection area for individual harbor porpoises. This model-based approach resulted in a posterior distribution of the effective detection area of individual harbor porpoises consistent with previously published values. This technique is a viable alternative for estimating the effective detection area of passive acoustic sensors when other experimental approaches are not feasible.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
Article navigation
January 2017
January 13 2017
Using paired visual and passive acoustic surveys to estimate passive acoustic detection parameters for harbor porpoise abundance estimates Available to Purchase
Eiren K. Jacobson;
Eiren K. Jacobson
a)
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093-0208, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Karin A. Forney;
Karin A. Forney
National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Southwest Fisheries Science Center
, 110 Shaffer Road, Santa Cruz, California 95060, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Jay Barlow
Jay Barlow
National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Southwest Fisheries Science Center
, 8901 La Jolla Shores Drive, La Jolla, California 92037, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Eiren K. Jacobson
a)
Karin A. Forney
Jay Barlow
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093-0208, USA
a)
Electronic mail: [email protected]
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 141, 219–230 (2017)
Article history
Received:
April 29 2016
Accepted:
December 08 2016
Citation
Eiren K. Jacobson, Karin A. Forney, Jay Barlow; Using paired visual and passive acoustic surveys to estimate passive acoustic detection parameters for harbor porpoise abundance estimates. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 January 2017; 141 (1): 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4973415
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Variation in global and intonational pitch settings among black and white speakers of Southern American English
Aini Li, Ruaridh Purse, et al.
Related Content
On the performance of automated porpoise-click-detectors in experiments with captive harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena)
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (July 2005)
Behavioral response of harbor porpoises to vessel noise in a tidal strait.
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2011)
Predictions from harbor porpoise habitat association models are confirmed by long-term passive acoustic monitoring
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (September 2013)
Determining the detection thresholds for harbor porpoise clicks of autonomous data loggers, the Timing Porpoise Detectors
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (September 2013)
Dual instrument passive acoustic monitoring of belugas in Cook Inlet, Alaska
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2016)