Recently, auralizations have become more prevalent in architectural acoustics and virtual reality. However, there have been few studies examining the perceptual quality achievable by room acoustic simulations and auralizations. Such studies have highlighted potential problems in creating perceptually equivalent simulations when compared to measured auralizations in terms of parameter estimation. In order to accomplish realistic auralizations, calibration of the geometrical acoustics model can be considered a necessary step. In situations where the studied space exists, well-calibrated auralizations can be employed for multiple purposes, such as multi-modal virtual reality explorations, studies of the acoustical influence of renovations, and historic research. Using this case type as a base, a perceptual study evaluating state-of-the-art binaural auralizations has been carried out. Three test sites of different complexity and acoustics were selected: the abbey church Saint-Germain-des-Prés, the cathedral Notre-Dame de Paris, and the Théâtre de l'Athénée. Models were calibrated according to omni-directional source-receiver measurements for reverberation and clarity parameters. In the subjective listening test, measured and simulated binaural auralizations were compared according to eight acoustic perceptual attributes. Results showed that the methodical calibration procedure employed in combination with attention to control factors led to ecologically/perceptually valid auralizations.

1.
M.
Kleiner
,
B.
Dalenbäck
, and
P.
Svensson
, “
Auralization—An overview
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
41
,
861
875
(
1993
).
2.
S.
Siltanen
,
T.
Lokki
, and
L.
Savioja
, “
Rays or waves? Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of computational room acoustics modeling techniques
,” in
International Symposium on Room Acoustics (ISRA)
(
2010
), pp.
1
6
.
3.
P.
Luizard
,
M.
Otani
,
J.
Botts
,
L.
Savioja
, and
B. F.
Katz
, “
Comparison of sound field measurements and predictions in coupled volumes between numerical methods and scale model measurements
,”
Proc. Mtgs. Acoust.
19
,
015114
(
2013
).
4.
M.
Vorländer
, “
International round robin on room acoustical computer simulations
,” in the
International Congress on Acoustics
(
1995
), pp.
689
692
.
5.
I.
Bork
, “
A comparison of room simulation software—The 2nd round robin on room acoustical computer simulation
,”
Acta Acust. Acust.
86
,
943
956
(
2000
).
6.
I.
Bork
, “
Report on the 3rd round robin on room acoustical computer simulation. Part I: Measurements
,”
Acta Acust. Acust.
91
,
740
752
(
2005
).
7.
I.
Bork
, “
Report on the 3rd round robin on room acoustical computer simulation, Part II: Calculations
,”
Acta Acust. Acust.
91
,
753
763
(
2005
).
8.
B.
Katz
and
E.
Wetherill
, “
Fogg art museum lecture room, a calibrated recreation of the birthplace of room acoustics
,” in
Forum Acusticum
(
2005
).
9.
B. N.
Postma
and
B. F. G.
Katz
, “
Acoustics of Notre-Dame Cathedral de Paris
,” in
International Congress on Acoustics (ICA)
, 0269:1-10, Buenos Aires (
2016
), http://www.ica2016.org.ar/ica2016proceedings/ica2016/ICA2016-0269.pdf (Last viewed June 30, 2016).
10.
T.
Lokki
and
H.
Järveläinen
, “
Subjective evaluation of auralization of physics-based room acoustics modeling
,” in
International Conference on Auditory Display
(
2001
), pp.
1
6
.
11.
T.
Lokki
and
V.
Pulkki
, “
Evaluation of geometry-based parametric auralization
,” in
AES 22nd International Conference on Virtual, Synthetic and Entertainment Audio
(
2002
), pp.
367
376
.
12.
Y.-J.
Choi
and
F.
Fricke
, “
A comparison of subjective assessments of recorded music and computer simulated auralizations in two auditoria
,”
Acta Acust. Acust.
92
,
604
611
(
2006
).
13.
ISO 3382-1
, “
Acoustics—Measurement of room acoustic parameters—Part 1: Performance spaces
” (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland,
2009
).
14.
W.
Yang
and
M.
Hodgson
, “
Validation of the auralization technique: Comparative speech-intelligibility tests in real and virtual classrooms
,”
Acta Acust. Acust.
93
,
991
999
(
2007
).
15.
B.
Postma
and
B.
Katz
, “
Creation and calibration method of virtual acoustic models for historic auralizations
,”
Virtual Real.
19
,
161
180
(
2015
).
16.
B.
Katz
, “
International round robin on room acoustical response analysis software 2004
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
4
,
158
164
(
2004
).
17.
D.
Cabrera
,
J.
Xun
, and
M.
Guski
, “
Calculating reverberation time from impulse responses: A comparison of software implementations
,”
Acoust. Aust.
4
(2),
1
10
(
2016
).
18.
L.
Beranek
,
Acoustics
(
Acoustical Society of America
,
Melville, NY
,
1986
), pp.
1
643
.
19.
L.
Beranek
,
Concert and Opera Halls: How they Sound
(
Acoustical Society of America
,
Melville, NY
,
1996
), pp.
1
643
.
20.
M.
Vorländer
,
Auralizations Fundamentals of Acoustics, Modeling, Simulation, Algorithms and Acoustic Virtual Reality
(
Springer-Verlag
,
Berlin
,
2008
), pp.
1
335
.
21.

The notation employed here denotes the source-receiver combination of Source 2 and Receiver 1. This notation is employed throughout this paper.

22.
B.
Postma
,
A.
Tallon
, and
B.
Katz
, “
Calibrated auralization simulation of the abbey of Saint-Germain-des-Prés for historical study
,” in the
International Conference on Auditorium Acoustics
(
2015
), Vol.
37
, pp.
190
197
, available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283457384_Calibrated_auralization_simulation_of_the_abbey_of_Saint-Germain-des-Pres_for_historical_study (Last viewed June 30, 2016).
23.
T.
Lokki
,
J.
Pätynen
, and
V.
Pulkki
, “
Recording of anechoic symphony music
,” in
Proceedings of Acoustics
(
2008
), pp.
6431
6436
.
24.

In the preliminary test defined as Coloration.

25.
R.
Thiele
, “
Richtungsverteilung und zeitfolge der schallruckwurfe in räumen” (“Directional distribution and sequence of the sound reflections in rooms”)
,
Acustica
3
,
291
302
(
1953
).
26.
W.
Reichardt
,
O.
Abdel Alim
, and
W.
Schmidt
, “
Definition und messgrunde eines objektiven masses zur ermittlung der grenze zwischen brauchbarer und unbrauchbarer durchsichtigkeit bei musikarbietung” (“Definition and basis of making an objective evaluation to distinguish between useful and useless clarity defining musical performances)
,”
Acustica
32
,
126
137
(
1975
).
27.
B.
Katz
and
C.
d'Alessandro
, “
Directivity measurements of the singing voice
,” in
International Congress on Acoustics
, Madrid (
2007
), Vol.
19
, pp.
1
6
, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236213215_Directivity_measurements_of_the_singing_voice (Last viewed June 30, 2016).
28.
B. N.
Postma
and
B. F.
Katz
, “
Dynamic voice directivity in room acoustic auralizations
,” in
German Annual Conference on Acoustics (DAGA)
(
2016
), pp.
352
355
.
29.
D.
Poirier-Quinot
,
B. N.
Postma
, and
B. F. G.
Katz
, “
Augmented auralization: Complimenting auralizations with immersive virtual reality technologies
,” in
International Symposium on Music and Room Acoustics (ISMRA)
, La Plata (
2016
), pp.
1
10
.
You do not currently have access to this content.