Speech perception abilities vary substantially across listeners, particularly in adverse conditions including those stemming from environmental degradation (e.g., noise) or from talker-related challenges (e.g., nonnative or disordered speech). This study examined adult listeners' recognition of words in phrases produced by six talkers representing three speech varieties: a nonnative accent (Spanish-accented English), a regional dialect (Irish English), and a disordered variety (ataxic dysarthria). Semantically anomalous phrases from these talkers were presented in a transcription task and intelligibility scores, percent words correct, were compared across the three speech varieties. Three cognitive-linguistic areas—receptive vocabulary, cognitive flexibility, and inhibitory control of attention—were assessed as possible predictors of individual word recognition performance. Intelligibility scores for the Spanish accent were significantly correlated with scores for the Irish English and ataxic dysarthria. Scores for the Irish English and dysarthric speech, in contrast, were not correlated. Furthermore, receptive vocabulary was the only cognitive-linguistic assessment that significantly predicted intelligibility scores. These results suggest that, rather than a global skill of perceiving speech that deviates from native dialect norms, listeners may possess specific abilities to overcome particular types of acoustic-phonetic deviation. Furthermore, vocabulary size offers performance benefits for intelligibility of speech that deviates from one's typical dialect norms.
References
1.
Adank
, P.
, Evans
, B. G.
, Stuart-Smith
, J.
, and Scott
, S. K.
(2009
). “Comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar native accents under adverse listening conditions
,” J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform.
35
, 520
–529
.2.
Adank
, P.
, and Janse
, E.
(2010
). “Comprehension of a novel accent by young and older listeners
,” Psychol. Aging
25
, 736
–740
.3.
Akeroyd
, M.
(2008
). “Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults
,” Int. J. Audiol.
47
, S53
–S71
.4.
Atagi
, E.
, and Bent
, T.
(2015
). “Relationship between listeners' nonnative speech recognition and categorization abilities
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
137
, EL44
–EL50
.5.
Baese-Berk
, M. M.
, Bradlow
, A. R.
, and Wright
, B. A.
(2013
). “Accent-independent adaptation to foreign accented speech
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
133
, EL174
–EL180
.6.
Baese-Berk
, M. M.
, and Morrill
, T. H.
(2015
). “Speaking rate consistency in native and non-native speakers of English
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
138
, EL223
–EL228
.7.
Banks
, B.
, Gowen
, E.
, Munro
, K. J.
, and Adank
, P.
(2015
). “Cognitive predictors of perceptual adaptation to accented speech
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
137
, 2015
–2024
.8.
Benichov
, J.
, Cox
, L. C.
, Tun
, P. A.
, and Wingfield
, A.
(2012
). “Word recognition within a linguistic context: Effects of age, hearing acuity, verbal ability, and cognitive function
,” Ear Hear.
33
, 262
–268
.9.
Borrie
, S. A.
(2015
). “Visual speech information: A help or hindrance in perceptual processing of dysarthric speech
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
137
, 1473
–1480
.10.
Borrie
, S. A.
, Lansford
, K. L.
, and Barrett
, T. S.
(2016
). “Rhythm perception and its role in recognition and learning of dysrhythmic speech
,” J. Speech, Lang., Hear. Res
., in press.11.
Borrie
, S. A.
, McAuliffe
, M. J.
, and Liss
, J. M.
(2012a
). “Perceptual learning of dysarthric speech: A review of experimental studies
,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
55
, 290
–305
.12.
Borrie
, S. A.
, McAuliffe
, M. J.
, Liss
, J. M.
, Kirk
, C.
, O'Beirne
, G. A.
, and Anderson
, T.
(2012b
). “Familiarisation conditions and the mechanisms that underlie improved recognition of dysarthric speech
,” Lang. Cogn. Process.
27
, 1039
–1055
.13.
Bradlow
, A. R.
, and Bent
, T.
(2008
). “Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech
,” Cognition
106
, 707
–729
.14.
Cambridge Cognition
(2014
). CANTAB
(Cambridge Cognition Ltd
., Cambridge
).15.
Carlisle
, R. S.
(1991
). “The influence of environment on vowel epenthesis in Spanish English interphonology
,” Appl. Linguist.
12
, 76
–95
.16.
Darley
, F. L.
, Aronson
, A. E.
, and Brown
, J. R.
(1969a
). “Clusters of deviant speech dimensions in dysarthrias
,” J. Speech Hear. Res.
12
, 462
–496
.17.
Darley
, F. L.
, Aronson
, A. E.
, and Brown
, J. R.
(1969b
). “Differential diagnostic patterns of dysarthria
,” J. Speech Hear. Res.
12
, 246
–269
.18.
Davis
, M. H.
, Johnsrude
, I. S.
, Hervais-Adelman
, A.
, Taylor
, K.
, and McGettigan
, C.
(2005
). “Lexical information drives: Perceptual learning of distorted speech: Evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences
,” J. Exp. Psychol.-Gen.
134
, 222
–241
.19.
Dorn
, A.
, O'Reilly
, M.
, and Chasaide
, A. N.
(2012
). “A preliminary analysis of speech rhythm in three varieties of Irish (Gaelic)
,” in 6th International Conference on Speech Prosody
(Shanghai, China
).20.
Duffy
, J. R.
(2005
). Motor Speech Disorders: Substrates, Differential Diagnosis, and Management
(Elsevier Mosby
, St. Louis, MO
).21.
Dunn
, L. M.
, and Dunn
, D. M.
(2007
). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test
(American Guidance Service
, Circle Pines, MN
).22.
Flege
, J. E.
(1991
). “Age of learning affects the authenticity of voice-onset time (VOT) in stop consonants produced in a second language
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
89
, 395
–411
.23.
Flege
, J. E.
, and Bohn
, O.-S.
(1989
). “An instrumental study of vowel reduction and stress placement in Spanish-accented English
,” Stud. Second Lang. Acquisit.
11
, 35
–62
.24.
Flege
, J. E.
, Bohn
, O. S.
, and Jang
, S.
(1997
). “Effects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels
,” J. Phon.
25
, 437
–470
.25.
Gilbert
, J. L.
, Tamati
, T. N.
, and Pisoni
, D. B.
(2013
). “Development, reliability, and validity of PRESTO: A new high-variability sentence recognition test
,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol.
24
, 26
–36
.26.
Grabe
, E.
, and Low
, E. L.
(2002
). “Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis
,” in Papers in Laboratory Phonology
, edited by N.
Warner
and C.
Gussenhoven
(Mouton de Gruyter
, Berlin
), pp. 515
–546
.27.
Hanulikova
, A.
, and Weber
, A.
(2012
). “Sink positive: Linguistic experience with the substitutions influences nonnative word recognition
,” Attn., Percept., Psychophys.
74
, 613
–629
.28.
Hickey
, R.
(2004
). A Sound Atlas of Irish English
(Mouton de Gruyter
, Berlin, Germany
), pp. 43
–50
.29.
Hughes
, A.
, Trudgill
, P.
, and Watt
, D.
(2012
). English Accents and Dialects: An Introduction to Social and Regional Varieties of English in the British Isles
(Routledge
, London
), pp. 141
–142
.30.
Imai
, S.
, Walley
, A. C.
, and Flege
, J. E.
(2005
). “Lexical frequency and neighborhood density effects on the recognition of native and Spanish-accented words by native English and Spanish listeners
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
117
, 896
–907
.31.
Janse
, E.
, and Adank
, P.
(2012
). “Predicting foreign-accent adaptation in older adults
,” Q. J. Exp. Psychol.
65
, 1563
–1585
.32.
Kent
, R. D.
, Weismer
, G.
, Kent
, J. F.
, and Rosenbek
, J. C.
(1989
). “Toward phonetic intelligibility testing in dysarthria
,” J. Speech Hear. Disorders
54
, 482
–499
.33.
Kidd
, G. R.
, Watson
, C. S.
, and Gygi
, B.
(2007
). “Individual differences in auditory abilities
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
122
, 418
–435
.34.
Liss
, J. M.
, Spitzer
, S.
, Caviness
, J. N.
, Adler
, C.
, and Edwards
, B.
(1998
). “Syllabic strength and lexical boundary decisions in the perception of hypokinetic dysarthric speech
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
104
, 2457
–2466
.35.
Mattys
, S. L.
, Davis
, M. H.
, Bradlow
, A. R.
, and Scott
, S. K.
(2012
). “Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review
,” Lang. Cogn. Process.
27
, 953
–978
.36.
McAuliffe
, M. J.
, Gibson
, E. M. R.
, Kerr
, S. E.
, Anderson
, T.
, and LaShell
, P. J.
(2013
). “Vocabulary influences older and younger listeners' processing of dysarthric speech
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
134
, 1358
–1368
.37.
Mueller
, S.
(2014
). “PEBL: The psychology experiment building language (Version 0.14) [Computer experiment programming language]
,” Retrieved May 2014 from http://pebl.sourceforge.net (Last viewed February 2015).38.
Ringle
, C. M.
, Wende
, S.
, and Becker
, J.-M.
(2015
). “SmartPLS 3” (SmartPLS, Bönningstedt).39.
Sereno
, J.
, Lammers
, L.
, and Jongman
, A.
(2016
). “The relative contribution of segments and intonation to the perception of foreign-accented speech
,” Appl. Psycholinguist.
37
, 303
–322
.40.
Shah
, A. P.
(2003
). “Acoustic indicators of Spanish-accented English
,” Canadian Acoust.
31
, 42
–43
.41.
Sidaras
, S. K.
, Alexander
, J. E. D.
, and Nygaard
, L. C.
(2009
). “Perceptual learning of systematic variation in Spanish-accented speech
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
125
, 3306
–3316
.42.
Sumby
, W. H.
, and Pollack
, I.
(1954
). “Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
26
, 212
–215
.43.
Tamati
, T. N.
, Gilbert
, J. L.
, and Pisoni
, D. B.
(2013
). “Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: A first report
,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol.
24
, 616
–634
.44.
Wade
, T.
, Jongman
, A.
, and Sereno
, J.
(2007
). “Effects of acoustic variability in the perceptual learning of non-native-accented speech sounds
,” Phonetica
64
, 122
–144
.45.
Watson
, C. S.
, Qiu
, W. W.
, Chamberlain
, M. M.
, and Li
, X. F.
(1996
). “Auditory and visual speech perception: Confirmation of a modality-independent source of individual differences in speech recognition
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
100
, 1153
–1162
.© 2016 Acoustical Society of America.
2016
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.