Previous research has extensively investigated the spectral properties of sibilant fricatives with little consideration to how these properties vary over time. To investigate such spectro-temporal variation, productions of English /s/ and /ʃ/ and of Japanese /s/ and /ɕ/ in word-initial, prevocalic position were elicited from adult native speakers. The spectral dynamics of these productions were analyzed in terms of a psychoacoustic measure of peak frequency: “peak ERBN number.” Peak ERBN number was computed at 17 evenly spaced points across each fricative production. The resulting peak ERBN number trajectories were analyzed with orthogonal polynomial growth-curve models, to determine how peak frequency varied temporally within each fricative. Three analyses compared (1) the English sibilants to each other, (2) the Japanese sibilants to each other, and (3) English /s/ to Japanese /s/. The results indicated that, in both English and Japanese, the sibilant fricatives differ acoustically in terms of both static (i.e., overall level) and dynamic (i.e., shape) aspects of the peak ERBN number trajectories. Furthermore, English /s/ and Japanese /s/ exhibited language-specific differences in the shape, but not overall level, of peak ERBN number trajectories.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 2016
October 13 2016
Spectral dynamics of sibilant fricatives are contrastive and language specific
Patrick F. Reidy
Patrick F. Reidy
a)
Department of Linguistics,
The Ohio State University
, 108A Ohio Stadium East, 1961 Tuttle Park Place, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
a)
Current address: Callier Center for Communication Disorders, The University of Texas at Dallas, 1966 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX 75235, USA. Electronic mail: patrick.francis.reidy@gmail.com
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 140, 2518–2529 (2016)
Article history
Received:
June 02 2016
Accepted:
September 14 2016
Citation
Patrick F. Reidy; Spectral dynamics of sibilant fricatives are contrastive and language specific. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 October 2016; 140 (4): 2518–2529. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4964510
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionPay-Per-View Access
$40.00