Frequency discrimination limens (FDLs) were measured for pairs of stimuli differing from each other with respect to pitch salience. One of the two stimuli to be compared within a trial was a pure tone of at least 100 ms, evoking a salient pitch, while the other stimulus consisted of only eight sinusoidal cycles (experiment 1), or was a noise band with a Gaussian spectral envelope, evoking a weak pitch corresponding to the peak frequency (experiment 2). From trial to trial, frequency was varied randomly and widely. In both experiments, the FDLs were lower, by an average factor of about 3, when the stimulus with the more salient pitch preceded the other stimulus than vice versa. Evidence is presented against an interpretation of this temporal asymmetry in terms of memory limitations. It is suggested that the asymmetry reflects a pitch-priming effect. In two additional experiments, both of the stimuli to be compared within a trial were very short tone bursts or noise bands; perceptually, they differed only with respect to pitch height. Performance was markedly better than in experiments 1 and 2, and was not improved when the two stimuli were preceded by a 300-ms tone intended to produce pitch priming.

1.
Barascud
,
N.
,
Griffiths
,
T. D.
,
McAlpine
,
D.
, and
Chait
,
M.
(
2014
). “ 
‘Change deafness’ arising from inter-feature masking within a single auditory object
,”
J. Cog. Neurosci.
26
,
514
528
.
2.
Bharucha
,
J. J.
, and
Pryor
,
J. H.
(
1986
). “
Disrupting the isochrony underlying rhythm: An asymmetry in discrimination
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
40
,
137
141
.
3.
Bilsen
,
F. A.
(
2001
). “
The case of the missing central spectra
,” in
Physiological and Psychophysical Bases of Auditory Function
, edited by
D. J.
Breebart
,
A. J. M.
Houtsma
,
A.
Kohlrausch
,
V. F.
Prijs
, and
R.
Schoonoven
(
Shaker
,
Maastricht, The Netherlands
), pp.
145
152
.
4.
Butler
,
B. E.
,
Folland
,
N. A.
, and
Trainor
,
L. J.
(
2013
). “
Development of pitch processing: Infants' discrimination of iterated rippled noise stimuli with unresolved spectral content
,”
Hear. Res.
304
,
1
6
.
5.
Butler
,
B. E.
, and
Trainor
,
L. J.
(
2013
). “
Brief pitch-priming facilitates infants' discrimination of pitch-evoking noise: Evidence from event-related potentials
,”
Brain Cog.
83
,
271
278
.
6.
Carcagno
,
S.
,
Semal
,
C.
, and
Demany
,
L.
(
2011
). “
Frequency-shift detectors bind binaural as well as monaural frequency representations
,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Human Percept. Perform.
37
,
1976
1987
.
7.
Carcagno
,
S.
,
Semal
,
C.
, and
Demany
,
L.
(
2012
). “
Auditory enhancement of increments in spectral amplitude stems from more than one source
,”
J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryng.
13
,
693
702
.
8.
Cervantes Constantino
,
F.
,
Pinggera
,
L.
,
Paranamana
,
S.
,
Kashino
,
M.
, and
Chait
,
M.
(
2012
). “
Detection of appearing and disappearing objects in complex acoustic scenes
,”
PLoS One
7
,
e46167
.
9.
Chait
,
M.
,
Poeppel
,
D.
,
de Cheveigné
,
A.
, and
Simon
,
J. Z.
(
2005
). “
Human auditory cortical processing of changes in interaural correlation
,”
J. Neurosci.
25
,
8518
8527
.
10.
Chambers
,
C.
, and
Pressnitzer
,
D.
(
2014
). “
Perceptual hysteresis in the judgment of auditory pitch shift
,”
Atten. Percept. Psychophys.
76
,
1271
1279
.
11.
Coninx
,
F.
(
1978
). “
The detection of combined differences in frequency and intensity
,”
Acta Acust. Acust.
39
,
137
150
.
12.
Davis
,
H.
,
Silverman
,
S. R.
, and
McAuliffe
,
D. R.
(
1951
). “
Some observations on pitch and frequency
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
23
,
40
42
.
13.
Demany
,
L.
,
Montandon
,
G.
, and
Semal
,
C.
(
2005
). “
Internal noise and memory for pitch
,” in
Auditory Signal Processing: Physiology, Psychoacoustics, and Models
, edited by
D.
Pressnitzer
,
A.
de Cheveigné
,
S.
McAdams
, and
L.
Collet
(
Springer
,
New York
), pp.
136
142
.
14.
Demany
,
L.
,
Pressnitzer
,
D.
, and
Semal
,
C.
(
2009
). “
Tuning properties of the auditory frequency-shift detectors
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
126
,
1342
1348
.
15.
Demany
,
L.
, and
Ramos
,
C.
(
2005
). “
On the binding of successive sounds: Perceiving shifts in nonperceived pitches
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
117
,
833
841
.
16.
Demany
,
L.
,
Semal
,
C.
,
Cazalets
,
J. R.
, and
Pressnitzer
,
D.
(
2010
). “
Fundamental differences in change detection between vision and audition
,”
Exp. Brain Res.
203
,
261
270
.
17.
Demany
,
L.
,
Semal
,
C.
, and
Pressnitzer
,
D.
(
2011
). “
Implicit versus explicit frequency comparisons: Two mechanisms of auditory change detection
,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Human Percept. Perform.
37
,
597
605
.
18.
Doughty
,
J. M.
, and
Garner
,
W. R.
(
1948
). “
Pitch characteristics of short tones. II. Pitch as a function of tonal duration
,”
J. Exp. Psychol.
38
,
478
494
.
19.
Garcia-Pérez
,
M.
(
2011
). “
A cautionary note on the use of the adaptive up-down method
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
130
,
2098
2107
.
20.
Green
,
D. M.
(
1961
). “
Detection of auditory sinusoids of uncertain frequency
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
33
,
897
903
.
21.
Gundy
,
R. F.
(
1961
). “
Auditory detection of an unspecified signal
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
33
,
1008
1012
.
22.
Hartmann
,
W. M.
,
Rakerd
,
B.
, and
Packard
,
T. N.
(
1985
). “
On measuring the frequency-difference limen for short tones
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
38
,
199
207
.
23.
Helmholtz
,
H. L. F. von
(
1877
).
Die Lehre von den Tonenpfindungen als physiologische Grundlag für die Theorie der Musik
(
Vieweg
,
Braunschweig
, 1877); English translation by A. J. Ellis, On the Sensations of Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music (Dover, New York, 1954).
24.
Hübner
,
R.
, and
Hafter
,
E. R.
(
1995
). “
Cuing mechanisms in auditory signal detection
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
57
,
197
202
.
25.
Jesteadt
,
W.
,
Bacon
,
S. P.
, and
Lehman
,
J. R.
(
1982
). “
Forward masking as a function of frequency, masker level, and signal delay
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
71
,
950
962
.
26.
Kinchla
,
R. A.
,
Chen
,
Z.
, and
Evert
,
D.
(
1995
). “
Precue effects in visual search: Data or resource limited?
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
57
,
441
450
.
27.
Moore
,
B. C. J.
(
1973
). “
Frequency difference limens for short-duration tones
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
54
,
610
619
.
28.
Moore
,
B. C. J.
, and
Glasberg
,
B. R.
(
1989
). “
Mechanisms underlying the frequency discrimination of pulsed tones and the detection of frequency modulation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
86
,
1722
1732
.
29.
Moore
,
B. C. J.
,
Huss
,
M.
,
Vickers
,
D. A.
,
Glasberg
,
B. R.
, and
Alcantara
,
J. I.
(
2000
). “
A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea
,”
Brit. J. Audiol.
34
,
205
224
.
30.
Schellenberg
,
E. G.
(
2001
). “
Asymmetries in the discrimination of musical intervals: Going out-of-tune is more noticeable than going in-tune
,”
Music Percept.
19
,
223
248
.
31.
Singh
,
P. J.
, and
Hirsh
,
I. J.
(
1992
). “
Influence of spectral locus and F0 changes on the pitch and timbre of complex tones
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
92
,
2650
2661
.
32.
Summerfield
,
Q.
,
Sidwell
,
A.
, and
Nelson
,
T.
(
1987
). “
Auditory enhancement of changes in spectral amplitude
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
81
,
700
708
.
33.
Verschuure
,
J.
, and
van Meeteren
,
A. A.
(
1975
). “
The effect of intensity on pitch
,”
Acustica
32
,
33
44
.
34.
Viemeister
,
N. F.
, and
Bacon
,
S. P.
(
1982
). “
Forward masking by enhanced components in harmonic complexes
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
71
,
1502
1507
.
35.
Wang
,
N.
, and
Oxenham
,
A. J.
(
2016
). “
Effects of auditory enhancement on the loudness of masker and target components
,”
Hear. Res.
333
,
150
156
.
36.
Warrier
,
C. M.
, and
Zatorre
,
R. J.
(
2002
). “
Influence of tonal context and timbral variation on perception of pitch
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
64
,
198
207
.
37.
Wright
,
B. A.
,
McFadden
,
D.
, and
Champlin
,
C. A.
(
1993
). “
Adaptation of suppression as an explanation of enhancement effects
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
94
,
72
82
.
39.
Yost
,
W. A.
,
Patterson
,
R.
, and
Sheft
,
S.
(
1996
). “
A time domain description for the pitch strength of iterated rippled noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
99
,
1066
1078
.
38.
Zwicker
,
E.
(
1970
). “
Masking and psychological excitation as consequences of the ear's frequency analysis
,” in
Frequency Analysis and Periodicity Detection in Hearing
, edited by
R.
Plomp
and
G. F.
Smoorenburg
(
Sijthoff
,
Leiden, the Netherlands
), pp.
376
394
.
You do not currently have access to this content.